The EGO, which is the sole culprit for the vast amount of man's troubles says hello! It s MINE I tell you now go DIE!!!!!! Buwahahaha
I checked about five of the sources that you provided and the one incident was relatively baseless because it was in speech from lines his friend batted around with him. I also checked varying sources on Paul and not only was he accused of plagiarizing a speech taken from Wikipedia, he was accused of plagiarizing the written word from an article published a week earlier by another journalist's. Did you choose to misrepresent the information or did you just not thoroughly check the information and made an assumptive misrepresentation? The outcome for this is exactly the same but one is an error in judgement (a mistake) like Obama's and one is quite detrimental to a body's character like Paul's. I prefer to think and hope in this case that it was an error in judgement because this is the first time I have ever seen any post by you.
I went back and checked every one you listed and they were all the same story. You are receiving like post for blatant misrepresentation of facts. I have only one thing to say to you. PLEASE STOP! This is the kind of crap that is literally bringing this beautiful and magical country to its knees on a scale never seen before in my lifetime. WAKE UP! You don't have to lie and spread rumors and rumors of rumors to be heard. Create an argument in your own words like others have done on this very thread without misrepresenting the information. This will eventually gut your credibility and actually has for me until you post something more honest. Eventually, it will kill your most sacred friendships. This is not a prediction, it is a certainty.
Totally agree! You should continue to try! But I think you may want to look for someone else to lead that effort! Rand Paul is nothing. . . .he just came to be the Libertarians' hero because of whom his father is, and his father's reputation among Liberterians. As more of his character and "accomplishments" come to light, I am increasingly less impressed with this guy. I don't think you have a chance with this joker!
He's really not a "hero" to libertarians. In fact, lots of them don't even consider him a "real" libertarian, and I would be inclined to agree with that assessment, but his record is probably the closest thing resembling libertarian government in Washington DC, so if I'm going to support a Presidential candidate, I'm going to support the most libertarian candidate with a realistic chance of winning, and that's Rand Paul in my opinion. If you can find a more libertarian candidate with a realistic chance of winning, then I'll be more than happy to take a look at them. That said, it really doesn't matter if he wins because, in my opinion, scientific advancements will organically bring about a global anarchic state where everyone enjoys total self-reliance and the state slowly recedes into the background. The Presidency is of little consequence, really.
So says Obama. Do you have this in writing from John? Nope, thought so. You people are so damn gullible it is embarrassing. - - - Updated - - - You will believe ANYTHING Obama and his sycophants sells you won't you. He is the biggest hack of them all and you are infatuated with the asshat.
Everyone knows who said "I have a dream", "Ask not what your country...", "We have nothing to fear but fear itself". That is not the same as "lifting" entire paragraphs from Wikipedia, articles and opinion pieces. You people are so much in denial.
I was never impress with Rand Paul. His plagiarism means nothing to me but, if he meant something to you, look for someone less dishonest or less clueless.
