Repealing age limits for sexual relationships.

As I said, you must not manipulate children into detrimental activity. You must not lie them too. For example you must not lie them that sex is harmful.

 

You are off your ****ing rocker..

 

That is a positive assertion, a 'theory' if you will. It does require evidence and proof, and considering there are likely to be several studies by entirely different authors, you would need proof that each of them was compromised to discredit the work.

 

I never said they were compromised to discredit their work. This bias is not about their studies, it's their decision to publish studies. It's not an accusation, because we don't know names of researches who decided to not publish them. And as I said all of this doesn't matter, because studies proving that sex is harmful for children, are simply do not exist. For this reason can we rely on them or not, doesn't matter.

 

Wth are you talking about? Sex absolutely can be harmful. Sex involves the risk of infections, unwanted pregnancy and transmission of STDs. None of which is a young child prepared to deal with or even understand the consequences of.

Your argument is AT BEST patently ludicrous and at worst a predatory position of taking advantage of young children so you can get your rocks off while having a complete disregard of the safety or welfare of a child.

 

It's not his responsibility. Child can be poisoned with food, it doesn't mean he have to be responsible for what he eats. If child have sex with another child though it can be dangerous and must not happen without supervision of adults.

Safety and welfare of a child must be absolute priority.

 

No he's not responsible because he's not CAPABLE of being responsible for it. The individual who is responsible is the disgusting sick perverted piece of **** who tries to have sex with him when the child's not capable of making a competent, informed decision on its own.

And that individual should be castrated and put into general population where he can find out what it feels like to not be able to tell someone no.

 

You do realize that our legislators have children, grandchildren, nieces, nephews, etc.? You do realize, of course, that none of those legislators is clamoring to pass a law making it legal for their 5-year old granddaughter to have sex, yes? The OP is clearly disturbed and will never represent the majority. Should our congress critters even hint that they are considering such a law, mama bears and papa bears will come from every direction that will make MADD look like a bunch of women throwing a tea party.

Fear not; it'll never happen.

 

adults should not be able to take advantage of children... period, not sure why republicans are fighting this, time to protect our children, no reason they can not wait until 18 to get married

 

not hardly, same gender marriage did not change age of consent laws.... republicans need to stop this nonsense

 

Wait, what? child/child sex is okay as long as their parents are watching?

WTF is this?

 

You do realize that the homosexuals have shown you don't need popular support, you don't need legislators who support your position, you don't need the populous to agree with you. All you need is a court that is sympathetic to your claims of discrimination and you can force your perversion to become legal in the face of all other opposition.

So you better be worried, especially since we've already accepted the homosexuals argument that the 14th amendment is not just for protected classes but for EVERY American regardless if they're in a protected class or not.

 

They didn't need to. They reinterpreted the meaning of the 14th amendment.

By the way regarding age of consent, that's not going to fly in the face of constitutional scrutiny. How can it be constitutionally acceptable for a person to be Incapable of consent in one state and then cross state lines 5 feet to his left and all of a sudden he's magically capable of consent, but if he steps back over the line he's magically now not capable of consent again.

By accepting the homosexuals position on their interpretation of the 14th you've put yourself in a position where you no longer have a cogent defense to stop perverts like the OP is talking about.

 

these laws been on the books long before same sex marriage, you need to come up with something new

minors are not consenting adults

 

Whatever. You can spend your days in fear that NAMBLA will get their way. No, the nine judges on SCOTUS will not be agreeing that raping children is legal. What's wrong with you?

 

it's been legal in some states for hetrosexuals

"SHOCKING: Courtney Stodden's Mom Regrets Letting Her 16-Year-Old Daughter Marry 51-Year-Old Doug Hutchinson"

http://jezebel.com/shocking-courtney-stoddens-mom-regrets-letting-her-16-1728088660

some are trying to change that to 18, but some conservatives are fighting it, claiming it's a religious right for an adult to marry a child

 

for crying out loud, won't any adults have sex with you?

 

The OP is talking about having sex with 5-year olds. This will NEVER happen. Geez.

 

Did I ever denied it?

Fixed.

Children completely able to tell "no", and it is one of their most used words.

 

I find something a little creepy about your post, but at the same time, I am not sure these arbitrary age fences really serve society well either. Maybe we should have a standard like porn--we know it when we see it when it comes to exploitation because it can be all sort of factually blurred up when it comes to inter-teen relationships. Thirty year olds and 14 year olds, however, no way.

 

And still they have children, why?

 

At least they have to be sure they use condoms in penetrative sex.

 

Sickest thing I've ever heard

 

And blacks are not whites, women are not men, gays are not consenting adults of different sexes, so what?

 

We're not talking about rape.