Republican: Jesus Couldn't Be The Speaker and get 218 Republicans behind something

Yes, and with their convoluted reasoning, this worsening situation will thrill the right wing climate change deniers. After all, to most right-wingers, acknowledging climate change means acknowledging the many corporate lies made to protect short term profits, with no regard to the long term effects.

However, their satisfaction with their own misguided beliefs that denying climate change will save jobs (especially their own) will be short lived. The climate change deniers do NOT take into consideration the need for rain for the production of food.

Perhaps the right-wingers do NOT understand that supermarkets do NOT manufacture food, they are simply a marketplace used to centralize food sales. Despite the right's antagonistic relationship with science, it is a scientific fact that our food supply is grown by agriculture and requires copious amounts of rainfall.

 

Major religions have their schisms.

In Islam, Sunnis support the succession of Abu Bakr, the prophet’s friend, whereas Shia Muslims felt his rightful successor was the prophet’s son-in-law and cousin, Ali bin Abu Talib.

Some self-professed Christians follow the teachings of Jesus, others of Ayn Rand.

 

I have and unlike you I learned something from that homework.
Yes Dimocrats and unions like to take credit for such changes but this is unearned credit.

ANd getting back to the original topic the details prove that the Jesus charachter had as little or nothing in common with dims as with gopers

 

One thing for sure....he had absolutely nothing in common with money grubbing, war mongering, low tax, no health care, no unemployment insurance, no rebuilding of the infrastructure Republicans. If they're ever found out about their fake bible thumping and lose the world class dumbasses in the south who earn $30,000 a year and vote Republican they're finished.

 

The biblical passage proves government is to exist and to be financed by the public. Before the Romans there were no highways, aqueducts to supply water, police on the streets to preserve the peace, or other social services which made society viable.

Jesus would NEVER have been a conservative as warmongering and enrichment of the wealthy are things he condemned. The social gospel is what spurred the progressive movement in the last century. If progressives hope to win over the deluded right wing, they need to use Jesus as their exemplar like they did in the old days.

- - - Updated - - -

Unearned? Where's your proof??

- - - Updated - - -

But neither the Shia nor Sunni founders ever condemned Mohammed unlike Rand who was an antichrist - she condemned Jesus as a phony. This makes her followers antichrists as well.

 

There is no sicial gospel. The romans may have built great roads and aqueducts etc but they were not the first to do so.

Jesus was actually ambivilent towards war. He was also neutral towards wealth and accumulation of wealth. Yes he did often tell his followers to give away wealth to others but he never told anyone to go take from the wealthy and give to others as regressives on the left wing do. I have never stated Jesus was right wing or conservative he clearly was not however he also was clearly not left wing liberal or regressive. For anyone with a modern political agenda to hold him up as an exemplar is stupid.

History is my proof which you are clearly selective and cherry picking from.

Rand was not an anti christ which is simply a christian concept of a specific mythological creature. Rand was an atheist. Many of her fans ( she has no followers ) are also atheists many are not. She condemend all gods and all religions as phony and whther or not I agree with all of her ideas I do agree with that one.

 

Thank you for acknowledging that government improvement of the infrastructure was practiced by the Romans - and it was financed by taxes.


As for Rand, the New Testament teaches that anyone who denies Jesus is Messiah is an antichrist. That makes her and her followers antichrists and are to be shunned by all true Christians.

 

Jesus would believe how I believe. That's the great thing about religion, right? It's subjective. One man's homeless charity is another man's abortion clinic bombing, all in the name of Jesus.

 

I did not acknowledge it I stated it you stated aomething else entirely which was false.

Also just because they did it is meaningless and does not mean they did it best.

The New Testament does not state that about the anti christ sorry.

 

Read the New Testament and learn.

 

Well, I'll let them contrive to reconcile their apostasy.

Being a strident bible humper and an abject follower of an aggressively atheistic pulp fiction writer evokes the words of some bloke who had commented upon the futility of serving two masters.

It's no wonder they seem so flustered.

 

1.
That is not the meaning of the passage. I gave you a chance, and you haven't shown that you know the Bible "better than any preacher in the world."
2. OK, now you're just making crap up. Jesus never even mentioned warmongering. I sincerely doubt that you've ever read the Bible - for it's sake, please stop pretending like you are familiar with it's contents.

 

Those who life by the sword shall die by the sword ...

Do harm to no man ...

Practice peace with all men ...



These words would be quite familiar to anyone who has actually read the Bible. Such words ring hollow to Antichrists who hate Jesus's teachings.