This amused me. Where did you get your information? Read this paper or did you go straight to the biased blogs?
It is funny that you chose a very biased paper yourself. Just like most others, you make no attempt at an unbiased perspective, but instead dig out anything that supports your view and disregard anything that contradicts it.
So biased that its published in the Review of Austrian Economics? Chortle, chortle, be serious! You've been caught out peddling myth, get over it
Not much reason to be poor in this country today, education is available to all. It's motivation that is generally lacking.
I was pointing out you were incorrect. don't make incorrect statements, and I won't have to point them out.
You ask them all the time. This is why nobody can have a normal conversation with you, and you still cannot answer the question.
Not a proper answer, especially since it is not conservatives that are spending us into oblivion or creating a hostile economic environment.
Insult? Asking a nonsensical question in an economics sub-forum is, if you ask me, insulting. Its a direct assault on economic sense after all
You're looking like a fool with no answers, only unproven theories. You got one last chance to answer my question. If you don't answer it, and come back with more BS, you will prove to the PF community that you truly do not know your arse from a hole in the ground. You said: "Government (expenditure in orthodox economics, wastw in heterodox) is integral for the survival of capitalism." Here's the question: Why is government expenditure and policy (Obama Admin) killing capitalism?