Rick Santorum says, "Vote for Ron Paul" to Limited Government question...

Try reading what I wrote...

I just asked you where your proof is...

Do you have problems with reading comprehension?

 

does your ridiculousness know any bounds?

 

Yes. The difference is that I know when I am being rediculous.

 

Your assumption that by him contributing to his campaign it would somehow influence the "precious metals" industry when Presidents wouldn't have the ability to...

 

here's a repost of what i wrote:

"that's why i'm against the childish remark, "prove it"

most of the people that demand this don't have a clue what the burden of proof means

so cut it out and get real"

 

I fixed your quote for you...

 

no, you just showed how dishonest you are

 

I'm not the one making baseless lies with no evidence to support it...

 

show me the lie

 

Here is your post that you lie in

http://www.politicalforum.com/1061035348-post252.html

 

it's not a lie, it's my honest opinion

 

But you said you know he is...which means you have to have read something or heard something that positively shows evidence that he is in their pockets...otherwise you wouldn't know...you would assume or guess he was...

 

why do you think maloney contributes to ron paul's campaign?

 

Because the other 4 candidates suck? I'm not Maloney...why don't you call him and ask him yourself...

 

i already know the answer

 

BTW...he contributed to his 2008 campaign and it was only $300...Whoa!! Big money there...

 

No...you don't...you assume the answer...big difference there chief...

 

here's the bottom line, ron paul is never going to be president

 

Thanks for playing!!

 

Ron Paul: the incredible shrinking candidate

By M. Alex Johnson

At the risk of annoying supporters of Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who believe — and argue fervently — that the mainstream news media don't pay attention to their candidate, it must be noted that Twitter and Facebook don't, either.

Accusations that news organizations are ignoring Paul's presidential campaign are an organizing principle of his supporters, who take to Facebook and Twitter to complain that the only reason Paul isn't leading is a "media blackout."

Every day, hundreds — and sometimes thousands — of comments like this appear:



In fact, Paul's rally was covered by the major St. Louis media (here and here, for example), but never mind that — perception matters in politics. And the perception in some quarters is that the media are actively trying to sink Paul's campaign.

That sentiment makes up about 10 percent of posts about Paul this year, according to msnbc.com's computer-assisted analysis of a sample of 9 million Twitter and Facebook posts that have mentioned one of the four major Republican candidates through Friday.

(The analysis uses a tool called ForSight, a data platform developed by Crimson Hexagon Inc., which is used by many media and research organizations to gauge public opinion in new media, among them the Pew Research Center and ESPN. The results aren't a scientific reflection of national opinion. Instead, they're a broad look at what is being said by Americans who follow politics and are active on Facebook, Twitter or both.)


Since the beginning of the year, Paul and his campaign have been mentioned about 1.1 million times on Twitter or Facebook

Here's the problem: Over the same time, more than 3.7 million posts have mentioned former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney

read the rest of this article here:

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com