Rick Santorum says, "Vote for Ron Paul" to Limited Government question...

you just demonstrated that you don't know what you're talking about

 

How so .. are the flowers in the tulip patch blooming ?

 

tulips don't grow very well in zone 8b

 

Then you better not stay in zone 8b very long. If there are no tulips to cover up the fallacy world it is going to be a shock.

 

i'm here for the duration, i can grow vegetables all year long down here

 

I love growing food. That is probably the most natural work we can undertake as human beings.

 

Rick told the truth finally. Preach your establishment bull(*)(*)(*)(*), cartoonface.

 

i have some doubts about that, but ron paul should try telling the truth too

 

The truth of the tulip patch .. where life is beautiful all the time ?

 

what's the deal with the tulip patch?

 

You need to go back and read the thread to find that out.

Heck .. no wonder your posts were so discombobulated sometimes. You were not atually reading the posts before responding.

 

i don't believe a word you say

 

You don't believe anyone that says anything that conflicts with your beliefs so Im not surprised.

 

no, i don't accept lies, i prefer the truth

 

If you were really in search of the truth you would go not ignore and deny evidence contrary to what you believe is truth.

If you wanted the truth you would stay on point rather than make up stories that have nothing to do with the point in order to try and rebut challenges to what you think is truth.

 

what a bunch of gobbledegook you've posted

 

This is the expected response that someone that is not in search of the truth would post.

Someone in search of the truth would say .. "where did I do that" rather than employ tactics to avoid actually discussing the truth.

 

you don't know what you're talking about

 

Originally Posted by dujac

you're projecting

but go ahead and keep posting quotes you don't understand, it's quite amusing

You can spout ad hom all you want but this does not change the fact that you seem to be very confused.

You were given two quotes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dujac
good example: he died in 1812, he's not controlling anything

Your statement does not address the assertion "whomever controls the money supply has the power"

To the Madison quote you respond with more nonsense

Quote:
Originally Posted by dujac
why do you think president james madison approved the issuance of $36 million of paper money to help finance the war of 1812 if he was against paper money

Aftert all this all you did for a response was:

I restate the premise "whomever controls the money supply has the power" numerous times in the post and all you do is dodge, and obfuscate.

You are not in search of the truth. You are in search of someone that agree's with you.

 

so name the person that's currently controlling the money supply

 

As soon as you adress the premise we can move on. Do you agree that with the claims of Madison and Rothchild that "whomever controls the money supply has the power"

 

my point is that no person controls the money supply, its self-regulating character can be metaphorically described as being controlled by a ubiquitous invisible hand

it's amusing that you think the words of a megalomaniacal banker that died 200 years ago, have any veracity

plenty of people have tried to conquer and rule the world, none have succeeded

madison and most of the other colonists hated bankers and banks because of their negative experiences with king george III

soon after madison and some of the other founders became prominent leaders, they saw that banks were a necessity and their later actions went against the lofty, idealistic things they had previously written about money and banking

but, don't worry yourself with reality, your nwo bankster, conspiracy tales are amusing, it's all the rage with the teen set

 

I agree with you that there is no one person in control.

Disagree with your comparison to the "ubiquitous invisible hand". The invisible hand refers to something that is unseen or unseen factors that are not controlable at work.

The money supply is controled by a relatively small group of people which contradicts your claim infered by invoking the term "ubiquitous invisible hand"

Of course they have veracity .. Control of the money supply gives power.
It is not just Rothchild that says this but any expert I have ever read on the subject. (Ferguson, Soros, Prechter, Roubini, Rogers, Moog, Davidson .. on and on)

Give one source that claims otherwise ?

Who said anything about conquering the world? I never said nor implied any such thing. ( get out of the Tulip patch ..the place in your mind where fantasy becomes reality)

Of course they did because they experienced first hand how control of the money supply could be used exert power and gain profit.

 

groups usually have leaders, who is it?

notice who won the revolution and how they were funded

 

The Federal Reserve controls the supply of Federal Reserve notes...

Can you link us to what you are referring to?