Ron Paul simple did not get elected because the elite did not want him .deal with it.

Are you referring to the career of consistently voting no on big government legislation, to include congressional pay raises? See, many long term congressmen get to where this is the only job they have or know and make it a career. I believe the fact Paul voted no on pay raises and didn't participate in the pension program resonated well with many people as well as the fact he left congress for some time to resume his medical practice.

It revealed this...

[video=youtube;E2h8ujX6T0A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2h8ujX6T0A[/video]

 

yes, dr no isn't a positive thing

he's right

 

He got more activists who are smart and influential and that is what matters in the long run.

 

Activists are only smart and influential to people who agree with them.

 

Cause the truth hurts him that he has been brainwashed his whole life by our corrupt school systems and the CIA controlled media so it makes him feel good to attack people who tell the truth. see me and you,we can accept it that we were brainwashed our whole lives,some just cant come to grips with it and cant deal with reality like he cant.
No, but he has called several "Government Apologists", and that is close enough.
And it is true enough.it is very true,they all cowardly keep dodging all the facts listed in the opening post evading them and constantly change the subject.they cant stand toe to toe in a debate and are so much in denial,it makes them feel good about themselvves attacking the messenger who spreads the truth ignoring the facts that they ARE government apologists.

 

ron paul knows what went down with 9/11.you forgot to mention that he said before he ran in 2008 that he said there needed to be a new investigation into it.Paul unlike most people on congress,is not bought off and corrupt.Only an idiot would believe the official version of 9/11 especially when many of the alleged highjackers turned up alive.

yet somehow ron paul is a loon cause he wants a new investigation.comedy gold.

 

why do you bother with someone who is playing dodgeball? like I said,like all government apologists,he didnt even bother to read the opening post of mine how the establishment succesffuly sabotoged his campaine to win the nomination.they just see the thread title and start posting childish drivel without addressing facts as evidenced throughout this entire thread.

 

thats why he has no credibility.

so many of the government apologists here as evidenced in that post,only see what they WANT to see and fall for propaganda.pretty sad.

- - - Updated - - -

thats why he has no credibility.

so many of the government apologists here as evidenced in that post,only see what they WANT to see and fall for propaganda.pretty sad.

 

He obviously has not read pauls book.anyone who is open minded and sits down and reads it can understand he was the only candidate besides gary johnson
believe in the constitution and serving the people instead of bankers which he is obviously in denial on.

- - - Updated - - -

He obviously has not read pauls book.anyone who is open minded and sits down and reads it can understand he was the only candidate besides gary johnson
believe in the constitution and serving the people instead of bankers which he is obviously in denial on.

 

I love how the government apologists keep ignoring the fact I have repeated over a hundred times in this thread that he lost the republican nomination because the Ohio was the key state in the primarys he had to win to win the nomination and that election was rigged with Karl Rove being in charge of counting the votes.
and once when paul found out that he would not be able to win the republican nomination because of rigged elections,he changed his strategy to get the nomination by going after delegates and then the establishment sabatoged that strategy by coming up with lst minute rule changes that day effectively destroying his strategy

.i love how these government apologists keep playing dodgeball constantly.

 

as always,you took him to school and handed his arse to him on a platter.hee hee.all those people there saw romney for the fraud he is and how he is no different than Obama.

 

Ron Paul said no such thing.

None of the hijackers turned up alive.

 

Not, his activists. A large chunk of them were not partisans in the first place.

 

the misinformed as always.as always you have way too much faith on what the CIA controlled media tells you.hee hee.thats what Obama and romney believe in but not paul.lol.

 

as evidenced throughout this entire thread,there is no shortage of cluless people alright.seems me,rightwing and durandal are the only ones on this thread that are awake.

your close on what you said about all politicians being guilty until proven innocent.the majority are corrupt.most of them dont believe in the constitution and are bought off and paid for by the zionists therefore they dont believe in the constitution,they are here to serve the bankers and not the people.

Paul,Johnson,and Ralph Nader are just a few of the rare exceptions that are not bought off and paid for by the bankers and believe in the constituion.

No matter how many times I spell it out to them they are not corrupt because they dont attend AIPAC meetings like romney and obama do,the government apologists blatantly dodge that fact EVERYTIME and change the subject.

Not one single one has addresses the opening post of mine on here.they just read the thread title and come on here and call ron paul a loon and then ignore those facts when I bring them up.

they cant stand toe to toe in a debate.

 

stands up and gives standing ovation.

your about the ONLY poster on here other than me,rightwing,and durandle who hasnt been brainwashed by the corporate controlled media who understands all this and is awake.

cool to finally see someone else FINALLY come on here who doesnt have their head buried in the sand with all those ostrichs like so many posters that have come on here do.

Jimmy Carter,the last DECENT president we had,even he came out recently and said the united states has the worst election process.

He even talked about how both Obama and Romney get their money from foreign lobbyists.something HE never did.

this post will go ignored of course like my opening post on this thread has gone ignored by all the government apologists that have come on here.

 

another standing ovation is deserved.

Man its great to FINALLY see some more people come on here that have not been brainwashed by the corporate controlled media and our corrupt school systems have taught them all these years and understand all of this.

Great to see that there are some more posters out there that are not government apologists with their heads buried in the sand and really understand this that are coming on here now like you,lynnlynn,bobov,and moi.
btw,you forgot to mention Gary Johnson in the first paragraph as well.

excellent post,keep up the good work.

they just dont get it that there is no difference between romney and obama and the demopublicans and reprocrats,that those two recieve big money from corporations and lobbyists,some being foreign,because they are part of the establishment and thats why someone like paul,Nader,or Johnson will never get elected.no matter how many times you spell it out to them like you did so well,it just goes ignored and they onl read PARTS of your posts cause it doesnt go along with their belief system.

they ignore facts like the corporate controlled media had a vendetta against paul right from the very beginning saying he had no chance of being elected yet they did not say anything like that about newt, or bachman in the beginning simply because they are part of the establishment here to serve wall street.and not the people.Paul wont serve them so he did not get anywhere near the amount of airtime the others did.they of course ignore these facts everytime in all their posts.

 

there are many huge differences between romney and obama

for example: obama supports same-sex marriage, romney opposes it

isn't it funny how ron paul also opposes same-sex marriage?


here's a list of differences between romney and obama:

http://www.diffen.com/difference/Barack_Obama_vs_Mitt_Romney

 

And such humongous differences as
should we give Bernanke Dollars to Wall St. or Massive Tax Cuts.
Wow! What a choice!​

"It's The Economy, Stupid", Bill Clinton.
The rest is just fluff. Including same sex marriage because that was a judicial decision.
This or that ObamNey would not have mattered.

There are some who work for the common "us", such as Governor Jerry Brown.
Y'see we had this referendum for a fair and balanced approach to the State budget deficit.
Well, come mid April, tax time, the California deficit became a surplus.
Whose taxes do you suppose accounted for such a massive financial occurrences. The previously protected!
Those even Arnold dared not tax.

Moi
Populist.
Y'gotta believe in Percolate Up economics. RepubloCrats practice Trickle Down. Including Bill and Barack and Junior of course, too.

 

I was a Ron Paul supporter for president and I don't consider Bush to have been radical right at all. No Child Left Behind was passed under Bush, a socialist program. The tea party are individuals who's foundational belief is liberty and government that protects that liberty. Everything else is noise.

Past 15 years is about changing everything. There are pockets of conservation but overall - change biased toward socialism/left. Even with the republicans. Anytime the national debt rises under Republicans, they are NOT conserving. Even Reagan was bad at conserving. He talked the talk before he got elected but he didn't walk the walk. Debt rose greatly under his presidency and he passed an amnesty. You have to go back to Coolidge for a real conservative that respected the constitution. Then "boy wonder" Hoover got elected.

 

that's a ridiculously stupid assertion

 

Taken out of context.
AND Yes, fluff when you end up over taxed and fighting harder and harder to maintain an economic equality to where you were ten years ago.
Neither candidate offers a better deal to You or me. The same big money pandering, national socialism deal.
That is socialism for the big corporations. Individualism for us.
"It's The Economy Stupid", Bill Clinton.
So what fluff between the candidates would really make a difference? Afghanistan? Profiteers are still profiting after 5 years of Obama.
Same sex marriage was a judicial accomplishment. Not legislative or Presidential.

Oh, and dujac, DEAR - please do not quote me out of context.
Making a statement bold within the whole quote works more better and more honestly too.

Moi
Anti Corperationist

Here is a RepubloCratic accomplishment for you. Starting with JFK and followed by all those bi-partisan tax law revisions and failure to enforce securities laws.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/income-inequality-in-america-chart-graph
And that's where getting diverted by fluff gets you. Ignoring what counts. Smoke screened by fluff.
Lots of graphs and charts. And they begin at 1979. Not 1960 where they should.

 

It depends on which Romney you are referring.


[video=youtube;bxch-yi14BE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxch-yi14BE[/video]

 

http://ivn.us/2012/07/17/100-ways-mitt-romney-is-just-like-barack-obama/