AS expected, "progressives" always seek to denigrate their opposition. When the progs lose, they resort to dehumanizing people as a way of explaining their loss. That's why progs have the most horrific record or murdering people.
Alabama and mississippi denigrate themselves , like I said, they are a sad joke and embarrassment to America, literally
So if you oppose Christofascism, you should leave America? Does that mean America is a place that by default supports putting gays in prison like Moore does?
Roy Moore (or Ray, as Trump likes to call him) will in all likelihood win in December, and then bizarro world in Congress can continue. And here I thought Louie Gohmert was the height of lunacy and the greatest whack job in Congress - move over Louie 'cause here comes good old Roy Moore to take your place..........
jihadist aka, Muslims, aka, Islam's, I was just making an off hand side comment. My bad. Didn't mean you support jihadist.
The mental illness or deviant behavior know as homosexuality has never been a "Federal Crime." My own feeling is that homosexuals need no more consideration than those who do act of beastiality.
You said I would support him if he was a jihadist. You have yet to support that claim. Are you now claiming all Muslims are jihadists?
And Roy Moore believes homosexuality should be illegal and all homosexuals imprisoned. Do you agreee with him? Also, I really hope you don't have any pets since you don't seem to be able to tell the difference between consensual sex between adults and someone raping an animal.
Homosexuals isn't a mental illness. And it's only a deviant behavior in the same way waiting until marriage to have sex is.
Only in cases where homosexuals were trying to indoctrinate K-12 public school students into thinking their actions were any superior to those buggering animals. And of course gays should not have legal marriage status, or full rights to adopt children, any more than beast lovers do. Beastophiles and Gays are on the same moral plane, in my opinion. Consent between two (or more) consenting adults has nothing to do the morality of the issue.
Beastiality is illegal pretty much everywhere in America. So then yes, you believe homosexuality should be illegal and homosexuals should face penalties via government force for consensual sex. And consent is absolutely at the core of the issue. Your failure to recognize it is why you can tell the difference between consensual sex and rape and thus morally equivocate the two.
Oh look yet another churlish schoolyard "don't like it move" bumpersticker that doesn't have a thing to do with what I posted. Interesting that you freak out about sharia but are totally content to accept a politcal leader who actually believes in "god's law" over secular law. Stunning hypocrisy that you and yours are completely oblivious too. And yes, I dont' like religion for many reasons but that is my personal right and choice. I even think, tho I could be totally wrong that its a constitutionally guaranteed right in the secular state. But I could be wrong since the bible seems to take precedence with some whackos.
Morality can be based on individual acts. Just as a perv who plays with himself in public, so it goes with gays or beastophiles having public displays of their sexuality. The moral public does not have to stand for it. And by the way, at what age does someone have to be before an adult 17+ can have sex with them and it not be considered (by you) to be statutory rape?
You mistake my hatred of racists (of all colors) with hating all white people. that would be true if all white people were racists. I hate all racists equally. I hate all religious fanatics regardless of their faith. the specific group I was referring to the aging white 'supremacist racists just happen to be Christian. They may not be as violent as Islamist fanatics, but they are equally as intellectually and emotionally challenged.
I don't think that you can parse the voting rationale that finely. Not all conservatives think gay is a problem, but the candidate that best represents the BULK of their own perspectives and opinions is going to get their vote.
What "public displays of sexuality"? Do you seriously think people **** animals on the street? Inbefore you say gays holding hands in public is "public display of sexuality" but won't apply that same standard to heterosexuals. Statutory rape is decided by state law. Personally I think the law should be 18 for anyone over the age of 18 or 14 for people aged 14 to 18 (meaning a 21 year old can have sex with an 18 year old but not a 17 or 16 year old, but we aren't putting a 15 year old who has sex with his 14 year old girlfriend in prison)
He just gave them (the largest financial backers of terrorism in the world) the largest arms deal in the US history.