Ruling on racist "white only" pool sign stands

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Montoya, Jan 13, 2012.

  1. paco

    paco New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    18,293
    Likes Received:
    234
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is an actual name for a laundromat in Muncie, Indiana. I guess they have to change their name now too, because of this ruling? :rolleyes:

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Nanninga

    Nanninga Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2010
    Messages:
    675
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    These oh so advanced rednecks think Europe to be mono-racial. That leads to the question: are there peoples in the world who are similar backward like the typical US American? Honest question, I mean, I would suppose if you ask an average Afghan, he most propably know at least Russians and British or maybe he saw Italians or Dutch.
     
  3. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I hear that Europe is infested with non-Euro's.

    Must have something to do with the falling birth rates for the aboriginals.

    But now you have race riots and honor killings among the newer and less advanced Euro's.

    Some progress.
     
  4. siddhartha

    siddhartha New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    8,418
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ]
    Why so obtuse? As a Libertarian you support discrimination and segregation.


    In 40 or so years whites will cease to be the majority in this country. You might have a better appreciation for the concept then.

    Don't be disingenuous. We're talking about protecting the rights of the MINORITY. Mob rule will not work on the behalf of the minority. What you're really advocating is segregation.

    .

    So typical. The only racism you acknowledge is that against the majority. Poor persecuted majority.
     
  5. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What Ron Paul is saying is that the government has an obligation to treat every citizen equally under the law.

    That means Jim Crow laws were unconstitutional.

    But a woman with a privately-owned swimming pool or private business has a right to associate with whoever she pleases.

    Libs are the biggest racists and segregationists in the county since they support special treatment FOR blacks which is just as wrong as special treatment against blacks.
     
  6. siddhartha

    siddhartha New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    8,418
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "associate" with whomever she pleases? What is this...the bigots version of political correctness. Why shy away from it? Be plain. You believe she can discriminate against whatever race, religion or creed she likes!

    Special treatment for the oppressed, the victims, the discriminated against is what you're talking about and its warranted. Forcing equal treatment in certain instances does put the shoe on the other foot, doesn't it.

    You find it distasteful? Just wonder what it must feel like to deal with it all your life, in every aspect of your life?
     
  7. sherp

    sherp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    4,018
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Tea Partiers are about Less Taxes, Less Federal Government, More State Rights and Adhearance to the Constitution, not swimming pools. :laughing::laughing::laughing:
     
  8. siddhartha

    siddhartha New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    8,418
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    or female private parts...
     
  9. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Again, what I am saying is that government does not have the right to treat its citizens differently based on their sex or the color of their skin but individuals do have that right.

    You may not like it when it disadvantages minorities but libs seem to like it fine when giving special treatment helps minorities.

    But I think it is all the same either way.

    And so does Ron Paul apparently.
     
  10. superbadbrutha

    superbadbrutha Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    52,269
    Likes Received:
    6,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That kind of sounds like what white people were saying in the South in the 40s, 50s and 60s.
     
  11. superbadbrutha

    superbadbrutha Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    52,269
    Likes Received:
    6,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    ..............you don't have a problem with folks being discriminated against as long as they are not white.
     
  12. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    51,635
    Likes Received:
    22,946
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think you are making a Commerce Clause argument. Or do you just think that any time the federal government feels it has a right to intervene, it does?
     
  13. BroncoBilly

    BroncoBilly Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    Messages:
    29,824
    Likes Received:
    355
    Trophy Points:
    83
    As usual montoya, you are (*)(*)(*)(*)ing wrong again, because this conservative Tea Party supporter hates racism. I can only hope this pool owner gets sued beyond what she can afford. On a more positive note, this lunacy is getting less apparent as time passes, and hopefully these nuts die off soon.

    Thanks montoya for trying to lump all conservatives into your racists bull(*)(*)(*)(*) troll. People like you perpetuate divisiveness and racism
     
  14. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Read the OP...she does not own that pool. She can "associate with whoever she pleases" on her own (*)(*)(*)(*) property. Let her buy her own pool, and she can exclude whoever she wants. She is a landlord, not an owner. Even if she was an owner, these people are paying her (rent)...she accepted the money, she needs to deliver the service.

    This was not a case of special treatment. Fail x 2


    For all intents and purposes, it is. The vast majority of people there are white. Post your demographics. please include a source. Here's mine:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_ethnic_groups#By_country

    Note that most are upwards of 90% native ethnicity, and the remainder are ALSO mostly white in most cases.
     
  15. theunbubba

    theunbubba Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    17,892
    Likes Received:
    307
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Just like the effects of smokers second hand smoke?
     
  16. theunbubba

    theunbubba Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    17,892
    Likes Received:
    307
    Trophy Points:
    83
    ummm "landlord" is a term used to denote owner, not manager. Seriously do you even read this stuff before you post it?
     

Share This Page