Seems to me, a well regulated Militia needs assault weapons and not muzzle loaders.

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by slackercruster, Jan 6, 2013.

  1. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Translation: You know you have no ability whatsoever to support your assertion, and are now attacking those who demand said support.
     
  2. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For the actions of local law enforcement? That's the mayor's fault, and his only.
     
  3. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Political allegiances on the part of myself has never been revealed, because such does not exist. Republicans, democrats, conservatives, liberals, etc. no allegiance to any party exists, because such allegiances are irrelevant. Facts and only facts are relevant, because only facts are important. And the available facts indicate that you are quite incorrect in your argumentative position.

    By such logic, Barack Obama was directly responsible for the death of every black male individual who has been killed by police officers, because he was president of the united states at the time. Barack Obama is at fault for Eric Garner being killed by police officers in the state of New York via an illegal choke hold following your standard.

    It is quite apparent that you have no evidence to support your claims, otherwise you would have presented it by now. All you have is the link to a video that not only does not support your assertion, it actually undermines it by showing all confiscation being carried out by local police officers for the city of New Orleans, under the command of mayor Ray Nagin.

    You do not even have nothing in this argument, you actually have less than nothing.

    - - - Updated - - -

    If this line of reasoning is correct, then Barack Obama is directly responsible for the death of Michael Brown for the same reason. Barack Obama may as well have shot Michael Brown himself.
     
  4. ChrisL

    ChrisL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2015
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    3,585
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    The Black Panthers were protecting people's rights, or there to intimidate opposition party voters?

    If they have obtained their weapons legally, then they should be able to have them. So, what now?
     
  5. ChrisL

    ChrisL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2015
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    3,585
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Bush is not the president anymore. Get with the times.
     
  6. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    on the contrary, you have all the proof you need - denial won't work here, pal

    - - - Updated - - -


    see the earlier posts where it was the subject of NOLA gun confiscations which took place back then
     
  7. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Allow me to be more clear :
    You cannot point out a single scene from that video that supports your assertion.
    Not one.
     
  8. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    BPP protected people's right to vote as I showed in earlier posts - 2d Amendment applies to everyone

    - - - Updated - - -



    on the contrary, the proof you want is there
     
  9. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where,. specifically?
    From what time stamp to what time stamp?
    How does the video contained there support your position?
     
  10. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The video that you posted does have multiple victims complaining about the police confiscating their firearms. That's not proof, of course, that only the police confiscated firearms, but there is no proof in that video that any federal agents, either acting under order from the President or going rogue, confiscated any firearms from law abiding citizens. You've not actually provided a single piece of evident of federal agents confiscating any firearms from law abiding citizens.

    You have, however, been shown multiple videos and news stories, including in the very video you posted, of the superintendent of the New Orleans police announcing confiscation efforts by his organization.
     
  11. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    the question has been answered already - see my earlier post
     
  12. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you for making it clear we need waste no more time on you.
     
  13. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male



    the pleasure has been all yours
     
  14. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Every last second of the video has been reviewed on a second-per-second, both in the highest definition available on the website, and set to full screen. And it can be stated, with absolute certainty and accuracy, that there is not even one second of evidence that proves conclusively that even one firearms was confiscated by federal troops, under the orders of George Bush. The only evidence of firearm confiscation occurring came from local-level police officers, who were acting under orders from city and state officials.

    As said before, you do not simply have nothing supporting your argument, you have less than nothing, as your own evidence undermines your argument.

    With absolutely no evidence that then-president of the united states George Bush gave any such order to any federal employees who had been dispatched to the city of New Orleans.
     
  15. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You realize that if a felon is caught with an unregistered weapon, should registration be required by law, they cannot be charged for that crime right?

    Exactly how do you think passing a law will be effective against those who do not obey the law?

    Besides, when felons ARE caught with guns, they're not really punished, are they?

    - - - Updated - - -

    [​IMG]

    - - - Updated - - -

    Are we gonna put a cop in everyone's living room? How exactly do you plan on enforcing these laws?

    There are many states that have spent a lot of money getting these laws passed. In WA for example. Not one person has been convicted, charged, or even caught doing such.
     
  16. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I like how you keep getting outraged at your own imaginary problems and scenarios.
     
  17. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I like how he combines creating strawmen with tilting at windmills.
     
  18. Maccabee

    Maccabee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The second amendment applies to those not in commission of a violent felony.
     
  19. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    It is not illegal to protect people who are getting harassed and kept from voting as the NBPP did.

    MOD EDIT>>>RULE 2<<,
     
  20. OrlandoChuck

    OrlandoChuck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's illegal if they are not licensed to carry.
     
  21. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is if they're felons.
     
  22. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is, however, illegal to take any course of action that may intimidate voters, in an effort to sway the results of an election.
     
  23. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male


    blame the racists who tried to keep blacks from exercising their rights while the cops did nothing
     
  24. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
  25. Mr_Truth

    Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    33,372
    Likes Received:
    36,882
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male









    It’s over, conservatives: A just-released copy of the Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility report on the New Black Panther case shows the core allegations at the heart of this tale to be completely FALSE.



    It’s really, truly over: New report completely debunks New Black Panther nonsense


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog.../04/AF1uRpwC_blog.html?utm_term=.17e215e49a81



    Finding the TRUTH like this and other articles can readily be found via Google.


    Nice try. But once again, the far right in this forum has endured yet another FAIL.
     

Share This Page