No, no and no. African American. Too complicated and you wouldn't understand. There are Thai Clubs, Korean Clubs etc. on many campuses. Being redundant. You are the one that posed the question "Do you have a problem with student organizations for white people?" Which you interpret as excluding non-white people and I clearly answered that. I noted earlier some common interests unique to white people but I would be against them specifically denying membership because of race. Say, the Amish Club could deny membership if you weren't Amish but if a rare specimen of a black Amish wanted to be admitted they should not deny him because of race. And the Ginger Girls should let any natural red head join.
I am not aware if any interests that can be equated to being white. Maybe sunscreen? And how about your "African American" club? You would let in white immigrants from Africa? Or are you equating being black to a culture?
True story. A friend of mine who was born in South Africa tried to join the African American association at a community college, and was denied. He apparently was the wrong type of African.
Now I think you are just acting dumb to get me to respond. All the answers to your questions are in my past responses, figure it out. Did not change my response. There is a difference between only and for, if you didn't know.
Yes. A wee bit of progress. But it is like pulling teeth. Must be a delicate balancing act to promote that race equals culture and interests and yet also speak against racism. The conflict is obvious.
I love the idea of segregation. I think it will make our schools better. Let’s give them a permanent segregation of whites. We don’t need them in our communities anyway. Look at their criminal stats. We’re better off if they are segregated.
When the totality of your response is "No, no and no," you don't leave a lot of room to interpret nuance. Exactly how do you think I changed your response? I'm really curious because now it doesn't seem like you actually meant, "No, no and no."
Well apparently she's backtracking. Stay tuned but I'm expecting a full throated defense of segregation.
I'm half expecting her to tell us that "African American Culture" is.... [insert long list of race stereotypes that liberals used to rightly call racist]. But seems she dares not say it.
Well to her point, she's correct that there is a separate Black subculture for ADOS (American Descendants of Slavery) Black people that's different from recent African, Caribbean, or Haitian immigrants.
That's the whole point of CRT. To try and force this identification by skin color on two people who don't do it.
By saying I have made "some progress" you are assuming I changed my stance which I have not and as I pointed out there is a critical difference between "for" and "only". See if you can figure it out. I hear that's what they say in the klavan. Well there's this thing called google......here let me help you out......you might want to share it with the Penguin too.
That’s what the stats say. So if you deny them while they acknowledge them I suppose that shows who is on the side of science
Yes. And that is why colour blindness is so attacked by them. It is their enemy ideology (moreso than white supremacists) and we can all see why.
They need us fighting with one another over stupid **** that was solved decades ago. Give neerdowels a reason not to change and a person to blame and you'll have their loyalty to the end.
~ I learned a new word !! Great ... So it is good to know the synonym for politician. ne'er-do-well [ nair-doo-wel ] • Thesaurus.com noun An idle, worthless person; a person who is ineffectual, unsuccessful, or completely lacking in merit; good-for-nothing.
