Senate oks Gov't to Keep US Citizens in Military Custody, Indefinitely, Without Trial

Kokomojojo · Dec 3, 2011

SiliconMagician said: ↑

Stay away from Islamic Jihad.

Problem solved.

Tell you what, when they come for Ron Paul and lock him away as a terrorist, then you can worry.
Click to expand...

isnt the head of NIST, that is the people who did the 911 report islamic?

AbsoluteVoluntarist · Dec 4, 2011

RtWngaFraud said: ↑

C'mon...you can say it...."I LOVE THE RICH". Now GIMME more...correct?
Click to expand...

I'm not the one voting for the filthy rich Obama. Aren't you ashamed to be so blindly partisan?

AbsoluteVoluntarist · Dec 4, 2011

liberalminority said: ↑

this is great soon we can detain suspected anti-government and right wing militias without any evidence

then go after armed citizens because they can become a threat to government
Click to expand...

I wish I thought you were being sarcastic.

AbsoluteVoluntarist · Dec 4, 2011

SiliconMagician said: ↑

Stay away from Islamic Jihad.

Problem solved.

Tell you what, when they come for Ron Paul and lock him away as a terrorist, then you can worry.
Click to expand...

Why do you "security state" advocates appear to believe that the crime terrorism, unlike other crimes, doesn't have to be proven in a court, that the accusation is enough to demonstrate it? Don't you realize the whole point of having a criminal judicial system is to prove the accusation, rather than merely assume it? Do you think Obama has a crystal ball that can infallibly tell who and who isn't a terrorist?

"Who cares if they just lock up/assassinate terrorists?" But whether or not they have been shown to be terrorists is precisely what is in question.

RtWngaFraud · Dec 4, 2011

AbsoluteVoluntarist said: ↑

I'm not the one voting for the filthy rich Obama. Aren't you ashamed to be so blindly partisan?
Click to expand...

I'm absolutely and completely unashamed to vote AGAINST and and all republicans. Should I ever become filthy rich however, I'll reverse that stance immediately.

Any vote AGAINST ANY republican is a good vote, and the correct moral choice given the two party system.

Chip Farley · Dec 4, 2011

The anti-semite Alexandr Solzhenitsyn warned us about this and what our actions must be (in bold) when the gulags come here:

American Gulag...
Coming Soon
By Alan Stang
6-21-5

It was Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the Russian writer, who made the "gulag archipelago" part of our language. He won the Nobel Prize for the book of that name, lived here in exile and was mentioned in the media almost every day until he made the fateful speech at Harvard, one of many universities founded to spread word of Jesus Christ.

On June 8th, 1978, Solzhenitsyn told a Harvard audience that "convergence" of the Soviet and American systems was doomed. "Convergence" has of course been one of the main purposes of the conspiracy for world government since the beginning. While he spoke, it was well under way.

Solzhenitsyn also made these telling comments: "As humanism in its development became more and more materialistic, it made itself increasingly accessible to speculation and manipulation at first by socialism and then by communism. So that Karl Marx was able to say in 1844 that communism is naturalized humanism.," Humanism is of course the official government religion of this country. Maybe he didn't know that.

He concluded as follows: "There is a disaster, however, which has already been under way for quite some time. I am referring to the calamity of a despiritualized and irreligious humanistic consciousness. . . . To such consciousness, man is the touchstone in judging and evaluating everything on earth. Imperfect man, who is never free of pride, self-interest, envy, vanity, and dozens of other defects. We . . . have lost the concept of a Supreme Complete Entity which used to restrain our passions and our irresponsibility. We have placed too much hope in political and social reforms, only to find out that we were being deprived of our most precious possession: our spiritual life."

With these remarks, Alexander Solzhenitsyn was confronting and exposing the insane Communist monsters who have usurped control of this country. Before that speech, the Communist media had made him an international celebrity, perhaps because the conspiracy for world government found his revelations about the horrors of the gulag temporarily useful. After that speech, he disappeared from public consciousness like a comet. Today, few Americans can remember his name.

What did Solzhenitsyn say about the gulag? "At what exact point, then, should one resist? When one's belt is taken away. When one is ordered to face into a corner? When one crosses the threshold of one's home? . . . ." The same questions that are bothering you now. Solzhenitsyn bitterly laments the Russian failure to resist:

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? . . ."

Apparently, they had no guns. Solzhenitsyn does not mention them. But he believes that axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else they had, could have done the job. He continues:

". . . After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you,d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur"what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked? The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"

For more, Link: http://www.rense.com/general66/gulag.htm
Click to expand...

AbsoluteVoluntarist · Dec 4, 2011

RtWngaFraud said: ↑

I'm absolutely and completely unashamed to vote AGAINST and and all republicans. Should I ever become filthy rich however, I'll reverse that stance immediately.

Any vote AGAINST ANY republican is a good vote, and the correct moral choice given the two party system.
Click to expand...

In other words, your vote is based entirely on your own self-interest. Fair enough, but don't relate that to a "correct moral choice."

Daybreaker · Dec 4, 2011

It sounds completely insane to the point that I have difficulty taking it seriously.

Log in or Sign up

Senate oks Gov't to Keep US Citizens in Military Custody, Indefinitely, Without Trial

Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

AbsoluteVoluntarist New Member

AbsoluteVoluntarist New Member

AbsoluteVoluntarist New Member

RtWngaFraud Banned

Chip Farley Banned

AbsoluteVoluntarist New Member

Daybreaker Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Senate oks Gov't to Keep US Citizens in Military Custody, Indefinitely, Without Trial

Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

AbsoluteVoluntarist New Member

AbsoluteVoluntarist New Member

AbsoluteVoluntarist New Member

RtWngaFraud Banned

Chip Farley Banned

AbsoluteVoluntarist New Member

Daybreaker Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches