Sessions Is Interviewed in Mueller’s Russia Investigation

Not until after mueller's investigation concludes. But collusion is just one element and not the most important one as it turns out.

But then it will be replaced by discussing American military countermeasures and direct punitive responses as the latest National Defense Strategy has clearly declared to be their focus, along with china.

War on terror now takes a back seat where it always truly belonged. The ride just got one helluva lot bumpier for vladdie and his gang of thieves.

 

While I do not like Session's positions on many things, he is perhaps one of the most honest men in DC. And the last person you could ever expect of colluding with russia. Or doing any illegal activity.

The accusations of the faux liberals towards him have been crazy nonsense from the get-go. I guess they think he is like their fav democratic leaders, crooked, lying treasonous bastards. Or the GOP side, Graham and Mitch comes to mind.

 

When being questioned in an ongoing criminal investigation he can't. But he could demand an interview at some convenient time, on any other matter.

 

So you defend any questions about Sessions based on his character.

Wonder why you don't use the same defense with trump?

 

If Muellers investigation doesn't find anything will you still "believe" The Conspiracy Theory?

 

I just pictured Lil' Jeffie huffing it around the barrel under Mueller's overview and fire . COOL!

 

About sums it up logically.

 

Sure he can, as can you as a private citizen. The law, statute and code, doesn't go into suspended animation for government officials durring a criminal investigation. If the Attorney General asks Mueller during the interview if Mueller robbed the Langley branch of Bank of America yesterday and Mueller chooses to answer and says "Yes, it was me." That utterance isn't somehow 'protected', it can and will be used in a court setting.

 

Sessions is IMO of very high character. for I actually know quite a bit about him, as his alabama residence is close by, and is well known here to be of impeccable character, by those that know him. But as I said, I totally disagree with some of his beliefs, and would never support many of those things he believes in. I just think he has a right to believe in anything he wants. And understand many americans agree with his beliefs, just not me, an FDR Progressive.

Now, in regards to trump, being an honest man, or at least I work so hard in being honest, his character cannot be defended, rationally, and so I would be a fool, and dishonest in doing that. He would not be the only flawed character president we have had in our history. This is not meant to defend him at all, it is just recognizing reality.

His flawed character only matters to me if it is such that it undermines the average american, if it gets us into more wars, which are not in national defense, or if he stomps all over our constitution or is agreeable to that, as other presidents have done, including obama. His low character does not matter to me if it motivates him to be a sexual maniac, to talk like he lives in a locker room, or if he tells these ego driven lies which he is accused of. But, if he tells us like obama did, that we can keep our doctors with obamacare, well, obama's character on this so far is worse than trump, to me, given it is of such significance, this lie told by obama. If trump lies to us in this quality, I will join your team in blasting him. For all lies are not the same quality. If trump lies to the People, telling them this is good for them, they will love it, he signs it, and it devastates working people, then that lie matters. But if he lies about not dorking some porn star, I could not care less.

I think what defines my position on trump is nothing more than a few issues, which he shared with sanders. I am issues oriented as many more americans once were than today. And so my support for trump was not for him so much as for the issues he made promises on. Some of which he has already flipped flopped on, just like obama flipped. Apparently they faced the same force in DC which caused the flipping. And breaking promises.

You hate trump, as does your crowd here, and I do not hate him, no more than I hated obama. But I do not like him as a person either. I can put up with his ways, his mouth, as long as he ends up helping my class of americans. The working class, the lower middle, and middle middle class. For it was gov't policy, a change in it that devastated my people, and only a change in this policy will reverse some of the damage done. Which was done on behalf of our elites, by your party and the GOP. But would never have been done by the party of FDR. Your democrats helped to destroy that party, by wearing our their knees, in front of these special interests, as they did fellatio, metaphorically ,in exchange for campaign financing. You must fine fine with it? Not a sanders voter, like me, I assume?

 

which conspiracy theory are you referring to?

Trump actively colluding with a quid pro quo may not be amongst the indictments.

But there is not doubt ,and mueller isn't investigating, the Russian disinformation attack being very real and very effective.

Butt hurt aint gonna begin to describe what the US military has in store. Not that the russians aren't formidable foes in the new battlescapes, but the resource imbalance can't be mitigated by any small technological or experiential advantage they may currently hold.

Vlad ain't gonna be comfortable any time soon. Wonder if they'll go after his stolen money.

 

I think Mueller met with Sessions to try and come to a plea arrangement on the crimes he committed as FBI director. FISA abuses, and acting as Clintons Russian racketeer go between. Mueller may be a bit paranoid at this point. He also met with Comey, in person. Probably figures the OIG has both of their phones tapped.

 

You might want to tone down or maybe even up the dosage bro, and, I am being quite serious.

 

So am I. You don't think Muellers texts, emails, and call logs are being reviewed? McCabe, Strzok, & Page opened the door. Comeys communications are undoubtedly under scrutiny too. Old man Sessions recollections aren't the greatest. Muellers interview would have been a waste of both of their time. Mueller is scared. Probably met with Comey, to discuss plea bargaining options. Maybe they'll rat on Clinton or Barry O ...

 

And this is why Sessions was interviewed last week, sure thing on the smoke machine.

 

Last week, last month ... irrelevant. How long has the OIG been collecting communications? How long has FISA abuse, and Uranium 1 been being looked into? Mueller knows his times almost up.

 

Still can't actually stay on the topic but you prefer your RW rabbit holes I see. Carry on then , rest assured, Mueller is right on it.

 

The topic isn't Session sit down with Mueller? How do you know what was discussed? Sessions wasn't subpoenaed to give testimony was he? Isn't that the stage we're at now? Mueller subpoenaed Bannon ... why not Sessions? Mueller must've had a favor to ask ... or maybe a couple to grant.

 

What's the Mueller mandate again?

 

The mandate written by Rosenstein? I think I heard something about Rosenstein in the news just lately. It'll come to me ...

 

A number of Donnie's cabinet are looking at jail time, unless they come clean with the Feds.
Some will sing like canaries...

 

Prosecutors can lie to suspects. They're not under oath.

 

About what and source?

 

Like you I do not care about what two consenting adults do behind closed doors. Not my business. OTOH, I derive my opinion of trump NOT from the salacious nonsense, but on the man's words, his behavior, his actions, his bigotries, his inarticulation, his bullying nature, his lack of leadership skills, and his obsessive denials, his constant blowing smoke up his own arse, and his crooked past. All things that inform me of the content of his character. And i find it lacking in the extreme.

You on the other hand seem to be informed more by his color, his faux partisanship and economic stature (obtained in part thru a couple billion in russian/foreign money laundering) and alignment with certain far right bigoted policies. As demonstrated by the active vocal support of the fascist racist radical right wing fringes.

But of course you are above the partisan fray and make independent assessments based on careful analysis of an array of "independent" non MSM/ right wing blogosphere sources. Strange how much of their language you use unwittingly. Must just be a coincidence.

BTW, I am not a democrat. I am a Canadian. I typically vote liberal since we have a wholly different definition of the term in Canada. Hell our conservatives would be called socialists in the US. I do not deny my partisanship, merely that it ain't even remotely what you think it is.

 

Did Mueller do the interview on a tarmac? If so, look for exoneration soon!

 

Let's see what the SHS Comedy Variety Show has to say about all this..... Propaganda coming shortly... Everybody AT ATTENTION for official WH talking points...