Shortage of eligible men as women struggle in dating game

There is nothing inherently wrong with "getting laid." However in the context of treating the act as a commodity, I believe it to be a degradation of the person. In other words, people that engage in this sort thing have little to no self respect. Do you think there is a parent in the World who gazing into the face of their new born daughter thinks to themselves..."she's going to be a prostitute some day!" We're so proud. The men who frequent prostitutes don't see them as full human beings...they see them as objects...the women who prostitute themselves to men, do not see the men as full human beings..they see them as ATM machines, a source of money.

Both are maladaptive behaviors.



.

 

Many might agree that using a prostitute is contemptible I might even be one who agrees.

In the end though prostitution is an arrangement between two consenting adults. Few prostitutes are enslaved at least here in the US. Human enslavement and trafficing is related to prostitution but still not the same thing

 

Or even to add to this, the prospect of getting a women pregnant and facing 18years of child support.

Which would be terrible.

Feminists like to pretend they want equal rights, but they do not. The judicial system is a good a example of this.

 

the judicial system is a good example of feminists pretending.

right.

you say some of the dumbest things, not necessarily limited to this
or the claim that propane can burn without oxygen.

 

Well, lets look at divorces and see who pays who what. lol

Lets look at who typically gets the kids, and who has to fight for custody.

 

He is quite correct the judicial system especially family and divorce courts are heavily influenced by feminism and are very hostile to men.

Even the most moderate feminists support female privilege at the expense of men they do not support equal rights although they claim to do so

 

And since when did your OPINION set the moral standard of society?

 

Just admit it that women are boring and if there is an alternative to dating only few will chose to waste their evening in one.

Instead of getting out to pass few hours of judgment you can meet with your friends , go to a club where all ladies are naked and sit on your lap, drink till you reach total stupidity then head to a brothel where you can buy the kind of sex you prefer and get to do it with a professional .

You may think that this is shallow but non fun routine relations are a waste of time and effort plus only teenagers need to be "loved" and "accepted".

Women have to understand that they don't live up to the competition and they are handicapped by the fact that men do not mind loneliness .
Even if i am the ugliest , fattest , imbecile freaking loser on the planet treat me like i am your precious or (*)(*)(*)(*) .

 

Well, how about instead you actually look at what you said.


Feminists like to pretend they want equal rights, but they do not. The judicial system is a good a example of this.


The judicial system is not an example of feminists pretending.

 

Sure it is.

Who fights for custody, the man or the woman?
Who looses half their possessing and pays alimony, the man or the woman?
Who can hit the other partner and get away with it, the man or the woman?

Feminists pretend they want equal rights, yet take full advantage of terrible inequalities in the judicial system.

 

never mind, it took weeks for something even simpler

 

No, you are simply making a strawman and are upset I am not playing into it.

Simply answer those question, and we can go from there.

 

It doesnt really help my perception of your ability to make sense any good, when you make up things to say, such as about me being upset. Or insist on the most absurd chemistry ever. Honestly, people in America!

Your statement that the judicial system is an example of feminists pretending was dumb, if you cant see that you cant.



That was all I had to say, I dont care to be dragged into the swamp of discussing whether laws are fair.

 

Reading is not that difficult.

Read this very slowly:

Feminists pretend they want equal rights, yet take full advantage of terrible inequalities in the judicial system.

 

You trying to be condescending with me is cute.

Take time the first time, carefully write what you actually mean, and then you wont be so inclined to write nonsense like your first version of that.

Of course, it is still just stereotyping wrapped in your invidious opinion.

Majority-men legislatures write the laws, and majority- men courts uphold them.

Regarding full advantage, when it comes to court, people play for keeps.
What do you expect? No attorney is doing his due diligence if he does any less.

 

I would love to see feminists introduce legislation that require women to jump through the same hoops to obtain custody as men. lol

 

Keep changing the subject, you may eventually get something right.

 

Yes and what you had to say is based on a false premise which is that the judicial system has nothing to do with feminism.

You ignore fact that feminism has influenced the judicial and even legislative system to the detriment of men. This is why whenever a feminist claims to be about equal rights they are lying. Not one feminist will right ot work to reverse these trends because it benefits them over men and that is what they are about.

- - - Updated - - -

They are not it is you attempting to do that

 

All i did was comment on this absurdity:

judicial system is an example of feminists pretending

I notice you wade in with three different things you made up about me, none of which address the simple obvious fact that a judicial system cannot be an example of someone pretending.

It may be this, and it may be that but there are some things it cannot be. A fish is another example of something it cant be.

 

It is not absurd it is afct which you deny.

Feminism has had massive influence on government to include the judiciary.

The judicial system hostile to men.

Feminism pretends to be for equal rights. It is an outright lie and the proof is the influence of feminism.

 

Absolutely.

I note how takioo refuses to answer simple questions.

 

Like all so called " moderate " feminists it would require an admission that they are wrong.

 

An honest answer on any of these would admit an inequality, and would argue against the premise of most brands of feminism.


Who fights for custody, the man or the woman?
Who looses half their possessing and pays alimony, the man or the woman?
Who can hit the other partner and get away with it, the man or the woman?

 

If you think that "pretending" can be a "judicial system", then there no telling what you might think, including anything else you may wish to make up about me.

You pal wolwol there took what, three weeks? to finally understand that propane needs oxygen in order to burn, called me all sorts of uncomplimentary names as he denied it along the way.

But, to his partial credit, he finally finally did get it, and even admitted he was wrong; a step above any creationist, at least.


But honestly, how bright was that? How utterly determined that a GUY who is a FIREMAN cant posibly know less about the basic chemistry of combustion than some-gasp- girl. how intractable to reason like I show hie the equation, and he still cant get it.

Worse still some foreigner=girl can come along and learn English better than the locals, who cannot, it seems, figure out parts of speech and word meanings.

Im not even discussing with you on whether the legal system is fair, not because I agree but because that is outside the scope of what i commented on to begin with, which is a nonsensical sentence structure
equating things that are completely different in kind. I say that, then back you go to whether the legal system is fair.

Go find your fifth grade English teacher if a pretense can be a legal system. That is, if the least modicum of common sense doesnt give you a hint.

 

Oh I am the dishonest one. You cant even stay on topic, but have to try to strawman me.

Your sentence made no sense, that was all I commented on.

Were you "honest' when you kept claiming that propane can burn without oxygen?

I dont think so. You were among other things, showing ignorance, an unwillingness to learn,
playing appeal to authority, and refusing to admit you could be wrong.

Honest is as honest does, you failed that test big time.