You have no credibility on the teacher thread, since: 1 you accused me of a post that does not exist. 2 when asked about a higher moral code, you ask about more money. Pathetic. You obviously do care what I do 'behind close doors:
Its never ok to boo a soldier, straight or gay. Its never ok to protest outside their funerals. Its never ok to spit on service men and women like people did in the Vietnam war period.
Never at gays bars - go figure aye? Ive been to SF a few times. Ive yet to see any 'full blown' gay sex on the streets. Seriosuly, where do yo come up with this nonsense? The creatures in your mind about homosexuality really is not our problem. Same-sex couple claims bias at Safeco Field
yep, I believe that if I'm supposed to have a higher moral code than anyone else, then I should be paid at a higher rate than gay computer programmers that sit on their arses all day and complain.
I just knew this had to be some kind of bullcrap. Consider that the guy is obviously queer as hell. His fellow soldiers knew and didn't say a word. This isn't about serving your country. It's about pressing a gay recruitment agenda. Up yours!
if what I state on an internet forum is not your problem, then why bother responding? Obviously you do care that I believe that the homo lifestyle is not a glorious thing.
Just one more lie from rstones. It really is pathetic you think you can get away with it. From the teacher thread in your words where you support the removal of a teacher who doesn't agree with homosexuality: Whopper was as usual 100% correct and just as usual you LIED about your past statements in a thread only to be embarrassed now.
This is a PUBLIC forum. That means more than just you and I reads this stuff. That is correct. As a computer programmer, Im not in the position where I can help mold and shape young minds on a daily basis. If you want the privilege to do so, the cost is having a higher code of ethics for yourself. Then find another profession. Simple really. This isn't about money.
the post I referred to was that he believes that since I'm a teacher I should not be on an internet forum at all he did imply that. he is (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)ing b/c I did not quote him exactly and using it as a red herring. but he hates anyone that does not agree with his lifestyle choices.
so if an occupation is not about money are you working for free? PS i do have higher moral ethics. I'm not a homosexual.
I care what you post, because others read this. Not just you. I could careless what you think. Amazing concept aye?
Nice twist on things. Here is what she lied about: Try keeping up with the conversation texmaster..mmmkay? PS: You own me a public apology for this one.
Here is your quote: Which you CANNOT find one quote of mine to back up this silly assertion. Quit lieing about this.
No twist. You just lied. ROFLOL!!! You have lied so many times about what you have said I've lost count and I've never had my widdle feelings hurt enough to demand an apologies for your bigoted hate filled tirades. And you did LIE. What she said: What you said: And of course the post DID exist of your INTOLERANCE as I stated: Caught in yet another lie by a painfully predictable foe. Pathetic rstones. Seriously, that is pathetic.
He really he is a member of the LOONEY left. I know we say it a lot but with this guy its true to form.
Tell a lie long enough and it become a truth. You combat lie by speaking out. Amazing concept? Lets look at one of your posts shall we? This a 'wopper' This is a falsehood, but obviously a truth in your mind. I could careless what you think, but others that do not have these creatures of the mind do not need lies becoming truths. Amazing concept aye?
morals are 24/7/365 that's a concept you don't understand. why do teachers need to be perfect while off duty as in the fired teacher thread? if the fired teacher had stated something like "gay marriage is OK' then he would not have been fired which is hypocrisy in the extreme. You agree with the hypocrisy If anyone has no credibility on this issue it is you.
ummm. there is a thread complete with pics of gays doing their "thing" out in the open at a gay pride event. You would prolly be "excited' by what you see. the rest of us were disgusted. So, you are wrong again.
Here is what I said: http://www.politicalforum.com/curre...n-about-same-sex-marriage-54.html#post4366698 And this was a hypothetical situation dealing with gay marriage. It would be nice if you got your facts straight now and then.