Spoiled Milk: The Mann Act, California and CAPTA Funding

Uh-huh. Right. Like anyone is buying the idiocy of the claim that one does not have sex with one's "lover", especially gay males, in the 1970's.

Uh-huh...good luck with that line of crap, but , by all means, keep it up.

I just told some friends of mine, who came by to pick up some stuff I worked on for them, in a longterm samesex relationship (women, of course), that this was the tact being currently attempted to promote Milk,and they thought I was messin' with them, until I showed them.

Now, granted, they aren't very political,and they think Milk was a "creep", but that isn't why they find your current failed deflection so asinine; it's because they, like EVERYONE ELSE, knows (*)(*)(*)(*)ED GOOD AND WELL, what is meant by the term "lover", and your hilariously ridiculous Leftniiny Desperation Word Dance doesn't change that fact...

Feel free to continue making up what you need to tell yourself...it's fun to watch.

 

Thanks to you and Grok for that answer.

 

still no evidence milk had sex with a 16 year old mckinley. I notice you've stopped providing the direct quotes from the book, because they exposed you as a liar.

good move.

 

No need to repeat the quote , describing McKinley as Milk's sixteen year old "LOVER".

That says it all, except in your weird little world....and even you know that your claim is horsesqueeze...

You'd better get ahold of all those LIARS, who publish those LYING DICTIONARIES, about how they are all LYING about what the word "lover" means...

 

I'm still waiting on factual evidence that milk had sex with Mckinnley while he was 16.
Mckinnleys birth date, and the date of the first sexual encounter. Without these two important pieces of evidence, you have no proof.

 

He took McKinley as his "lover" then, according to Milk's longtime confidante and friend, Randy Shilts, who makes that statement on page 30-31 of his book about Milk, "The Mayor of Castro Street"...

No one bothered to film the two "LOVERS" having sex, so you are free to pretend that being Milk's "NEW LOVER" "had nothng to do with sex"...

 

That's the newest hot drink at the Hot Rod Cafe. You should try it. It's the shizzle.

 

I would say that teaching kids to worship a child sex predator qualifies as harmful to them. Or even to require them to associate sexuality with achievments in any capacity. The APA agrees:

Now look at the underlined sentences above. Think about what teaching little kids about "gay heros" means. No, really. Think about it. "Gay" describes a sexual behavior. "Hero" describes something to aspire to.

 

seems as if some of the posters here support pedophilia, why am I not surprised

in answer to the OP , i could care less what adults do in the bedroom, but pedophiles should be publicly executed in a very painful and prolonged manner. I think burying them up to their necks in a anthill would be appropriate, either that or castration

 

And a book saying he met his young lover when he was 16 does not mean they had sex when he was 16.

Where are the multiple threads of disgust for Jerry Lee Lewis who married his 13 year old cousin?

 

Jerry Lee Lewis isn't being taught to kids in schools as a role model as a matter of compulsory law. That's the difference with California and Harvey Milk. And yes a 16 year old LOVER means he was having sex with him. We all know and understand the use of the word "lover" in context with a man described by his friend/biographer as hyper-sexual [promiscuous to a fault]. The word lover used in that context is = to sex partner.

 

Gee, another Right Wing hate campaigner gets on the BS bandwagon! Why are we not surprised?

NO ONE here has implied in the slightest that they support "pedophilia".

Pedophilia is sex with a prepubescent children. Mckinley was a sexually mature male, like most 16 yo. males.

 

Of course, because the asinine claim that Shilts' refferal of 16 year old McKinley as Milk's "new lover" , in "the Mayor of Castro Street", (Shilts, 1982), wasn't meant to imply any kind of sexual relationship between the two is correct...right?

Speaking of shizzle...

 

The definition of a "child" varies; that McKinley was UNDERAGE,and was TRANSPORTD ACROSS STATE LINES, is indisputable....Milk was a Chicken Hawk, who not only preyed upon a 16 year old, but violated the Mann Act, as well....

 

You know, in reading the Mann Act, I can't count the number of times I have broken that law! And many MORE times I was HOPING to break that law!

Geez, at least HALF of the USA's travel industry survives on people breaking that law! Las Vegas ADVERTISES breaking that law on TV!!

As far as the moralists are concerned, we are ALL criminals!

 

I wonder why the OP author doesn't post what definitely would be the most popular poll choice:

"F. This is ANOTHER stupid bigoted thread filled with propaganda, hatred and lies."

 

I remarked about Jerry Lee Lewis in this same context. However, I don't think there's a Jerry Lee Lewis Day anywhere...just to be fair.

 

WHen will the Gay Guevaras stop the propaganda ,hatred and lies, is the question, indeed.

Like Milk didn't have sex with his 16 year old "lover", because the term "lover" now, suddenly today, no longer has anything to do with sex.

While you're at it, why not end the stupidity of the Gay Guevara posting, as well?

 

and the book you quoted said he MET Mckinnley at 16. Do you know his birth date? Do you know the date that they first had sex? If not you are speculating.
Mckinnley could have been a week away from his birthday.

 

Sil has claimed that he was sexually assaulted at 14 by gay men who were supposedly his friends. I can understand what this would do to someone. Trauma changes you. It is why many blacks are fearful of whites, why many gays are fearful of straights, women of men, etc. From his life experience does this not make sense that he would put himself in the 16 year old's place and project?

 

You and Silhouette should read the WHOLE book, not just two pages that you cherrypick to (wrongly) characterize Harvey Milk. I know you haven't read the whole book because if you had you wouldn't be here making ignorant statements about which you know nothing about.

 

I have. Have you? Milk accomplished very little, but was a helluva partier,and laid a lot of young guys, while befriending , and PROMOTING , the "Peoples' Temple" and Jim Jones, as well.

His biggest "accomplishment" was...being gay. That's all his supporters can come up with: "he was the first high profiel gay...". That's about it.

The statements I am making are IN THE BOOK. Shilts states that McKinley was 16 years old when he became Milk's "new lover" (pages 30-31, in "The Mayor of Castro Street").

The only ignorance your post exposed is your own..

 

reality is still firmly in place. the book doesn't say what you want it to say.

stop embarassing yourself. you don't even need to admit you are lying. just stop posting in sils threads. If you stop lying, I won't have to keep pointing it out.

 

luckily, california is not teaching kids to worship a child sex predator.

 

and yet you have exactly zero evidence milk had sex with a 16 year old mckinley.