Steven Jones: Revisionist quack involved in Archeology Hoax

OK then, what was the height of the rubble pile at ground zero right after the collapse of the North Tower? any pictures? & if not, why not?

 

Let's use your logic for proof of the the airliners. Considering there is zero proof of your conspiracy theory that you assume to be true, then the fact that you can find no documentation proves the airliners crashed into the towers.

 

Now there is a leap of faith if I ever saw one, you ASSUME that there is no evidence to support the truth movement. Please do think about this, the two gashes in the sides of skyscrapers allegedly having been made by airliners striking the buildings .... and YOU actually believe the official explanation? How about that free fall of WTC7, how about the complete & total destruction of WTC 1, 2 & 7?

The gullible masses that have accepted without question the official fairy tale are in for a serious shock when the truth finally does surface.

 

Try this:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pictures+of+the+9/11+rubble+pile

Ok, let's play the truther game:

Where is the evidence of another event that was investigated more so than 9/11?

 

You got anything that does not require execution of a script?
surely there are pix available in some form that doesn't require the invasion of my computer with lord only knows what sort of insanity.....

 

Yes, there are plenty available, just do a simple search.

 

PLEASE ........ give me a break!

I've been looking and doing research on this for many years and the photographic documentation of ground zero does not exist. The powers that be, made sure that
nobody got any pictures of the rubble pile right after the North tower dropped.

& as for a disaster that was better documented than 9/11
try both space shuttle disasters + Pan Am Flight 103

Lets get real here, when we get lame excuses as to why explosives
were NOT tested for at ground zero, and this from people who are
on the public payroll, and NOTHING was done to hold anyone accountable.

 

More arguments from incredulity,Bob.


You do that a LOT

 

There are pics if you look.

That is an unfounded and completely partisan assumption.

No.

The idea that explosives were deployed and employed in the attack is beyond retarded, and it is understandable that the first responders and search and rescue teams were not interested in documenting everything just because some future nutcases might jump to illogical and sensational conclusions. They were merely trying to save lives and recover the bodies of victims. You have no idea of what you are talking about.

 

On the one hand, you say that there are pix if I were to look hard 'nuff
I'd find them and then on the other you make excuses for the lack of documentation.

whatever ......

 

Yes, what is your problem? Why does simple logic elude you? I have no trouble finding pics, why do you? Don't berate me because you have unrealistic expectations of the clean-up and S & R operations.

 

You allegedly have pix, but so far you haven't shown them, and providing a link that demands execution of a script, doesn't qualify as having actually provided anything, where is the actual DOCUMENTATION?

 

That is so lame.

*SIGH*

 

The link I provided for you was 'Let me Google that for you'. The message in that was 'go and look and stop demanding people do it for you'. I'm surprised that went over your head.

You wanted pics, I showed you how to find pics. You then moved the goalposts to 'documentation'. Do you know what you want?

 

DOCUMENTATION simply is the pix of ground zero that can be known for certain that it was taken right after the collapse of the north tower so as to show the condition of the rubble pile right after the collapse event. Is this too much to ask?

There are several huge books of pix that were taken weeks after the clean up effort had already been in progress and tons of material had already been removed, but in the case of a crime scene, its essential to have as many photos as possible to document the scene so as to be able to understand what really happened. This is why I say that 9/11 is the most poorly documented disaster in history.

 

Welcome to Bobworld,Where NP standard of proof is too high

 

OK, I'll byte, what is "NP"

and note that if proof did exist, WHY then is there a debate at all as to the height of the rubble pile at ground zero after the North tower collapsed ( or rather was destroyed )?

 

In light of the priorities of the period, yes. Search and Rescue was the priority for some weeks.

There are enough pics for forensic purposes.

The vast body of investigative literature post 9/11 is the reason I say it is the most investigated event in History.

 

Dang android keyboard,,,,NO standard of proof*

 

You mean like this:

Or this?:

 

Wow, the level of debate on this site is disappointingly low.

 

Take heart,it has it's moments

 

I hope so.

 

Thank U 4 the quotes, Mz. Rice & the Shrub both obviously OTL ... oh well ....

 

Which has nothing to do with the premise. Nice try at avoiding debate, though.