Stormfront White Nationalists Showing Overwhelming Support For Ron Paul

Yes a random source. Half the time when you try to grab a picture from the web it's been encoded so that it can't be posted elsewhere. So I usually grab from which ever source will allow it.

The picture is real, don't worry about that. As I said, it was taken at the anniversary of a civil rights march in Selma Al. You could easily google "Obama, Black Panthers, Selma Al."


As I said before, it's hard to imagine that Obama was unaware of who the NBPP folks were, or unaware that they were there speaking and marching at the same event.

The NBPP also showed their support by endorsing Obama:



Then of course, Holder later pulled a "nothing to see here":

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU"]"Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly - YouTube[/ame]

And just to ensure that nobody has forgotten who the NBPP is:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p50qHzC01E0"]Meet The Black Panther Leader Who wants to KILL CRACKER BABIES - YouTube[/ame]

 

I'm fairly sure that if we polled members of the Black Panthers, we would find overwhelming support for Barack Obama. Should that be taken to mean Barack Obama supports the ideals or agrees with the views of the Black Panthers?

Ron Paul can no more control who supports or likes him than can Barack Obama.

 

Cutting foreign aid makes him an "Anti-semite"??? Are people really THIS deluded?

 

It doesn't take much to earn the label "anti-semite":

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOV0qCW7nBA&feature=related"]Ben Stein Accuses Ron Paul of Anti-Semitism on Larry King - YouTube[/ame]

 

How dare Ron Paul mention OBL's own words why they were motivated. How dare Ron Paul mention bombings motivating people! The truth = anti-semitism!

 

Ron Paul Newsletter:

A 1987 issue of Paul's Investment Letter called Israel "an aggressive, national socialist state," and a 1990 newsletter discussed the "tens of thousands of well-placed friends of Israel in all countries who are willing to wok [sic] for the Mossad in their area of expertise." Of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, a newsletter said, "Whether it was a setup by the Israeli Mossad, as a Jewish friend of mine suspects, or was truly a retaliation by the Islamic fundamentalists, matters little."


Once again I would like to remind everyone that Ron Paul knew nothing about the "Ron Paul Newsletter" printed by a company called "Ron Paul & Associates" registered in the name of "Ron Paul," his family and closest associate and accruing $840,000 for Ron Paul.

Ron Paul was also the only Senator to vote against this:

Mr. Speaker I rise in opposition to H. Res. 951, a resolution to condemn Palestinian rocket attacks on Israeli civilians...The legislation oversimplifies the Israel/Palestine conflict and the larger unrest in the Middle East by simply pointing the finger at Iran and Syria.

and this:

On January 9, Ron Paul addressed Congress to voice his opposition to a House resolution expressing strong support for Israel in its invasion of Gaza, and branding Hamas as a terrorist organization."

Yeah it's all in their heads. Why do they think that? It's not like any anti-Semitic types support Ron Paul anyway is it?

 

Yeah, Hitler fought for his country too, so what. Just because a scumbag joins the army doesn't make them any less of a scumbag. "Rev" Wrong is a prime example of a class A-1 POS.

 

Excuse me Mr Truth. Why did al-Qaeda inspiration Sayed Qutb preach the necessity of overthrowing the United States and Western civilization specifically in the early 1940's before Israel ever existed? Why that?

 

1) Ron PAul didnt write the newsletters

2) Israel expanding there borders with "settlers" is part of the issue. He was right. We should have condemned BOTH parties for their actions.

3) Hamas was elected. We dont have a right to tell countries who shall lead them. We also have politicians saying we need to defend Israel at all costs. There will never be peace as long as we but in and defend one side. Both sides are at fault.

Common sense does not equal "anti-semitism"

 

I think it is quite logical to wonder why so many black supremacists support Barack Obama. Apparently they feel a kinship with him.

 

The above is an example of a post that is made without the poster being informed about the actuality of a candidates position. Ron Paul is the only major party candidate who is for unlimited and unrestricted immigration.

 

He studied here 48-50 and brought his experiences back with him. Of course he only brought back the negative.

And yet with all this we are HELPING spread the Muslim Brotherhood and AQ.

Ooops.

 

For sure. And he knew nothing about what was in them for decades on end whilst they attracted extremists to his movement. Then he won't stop taking money from the extremists he attracted. Yes I know the whole story;

Ron Paul knew nothing about the "Ron Paul Newsletter" printed by a company called "Ron Paul & Associates" registered in the names of "Ron Paul," his family and closest associate[*] and accruing $840,000 for Ron Paul.

[*] Ron Paul's proxy Lew Rockwell

But the stories about "settlers" are Pallywood blood libels that have been thoroughly discredited. Why are you repeating blood libels? Do you believe Hitler's stories about German's being castrated in Poland and the attempted invasion of Germany via the Gleiwitz radio station broadcasts/incident?

What does that tell you?

Like whom? Who has said that "we must defend Israel at all costs?" Who has said that?

Nonsense. The Jews of Israel have been subject to pogroms and massacres long before the U.S. even existed. Stop the nonsense.

Meaningless phrase. Were Poland and Germany both at fault in 1939? Utterly meaningless gibberish in the context.

Yeah well done. Off you go now.

 

1) Hahah so you think the Settler issue has been debunked? Are you telling me Israel hasnt been expanding their borders that is all some big conspiracy? WTF does Hitler have to do with Israel and Palestine. Talk about a strawman.

2) Harper... Ever hear of him?

3) I didnt deny the holocaust. Again what that has to do with Israel and settlers is beyond me. Again another strawman.

4) Another strawman. Why do you keep going back to WW2?

 

What borders? Judea and Samaria are Israeli administrative territories and they have ceded to Fatah partial autonomy. There are no borders. It's part of Israel.

Quite a lot actually. See Arafat's uncle. But that wasn't my point. I made a pertinent analogy - you have not addressed it.

Never mentioned you denying the holocaust. Don't know what you're on about.

I don't. You made an idiotic analogy - I made a pertinent one.

 

1) You brought up Hitler when it has nothing to do with the discussion

2) Thinking only one side is to blame is the idiotic analogy.....

 

How let fought to conquer the world not defend it. Kind of hard to criticize a man who has walked the walk when many of the talking cowards stayed at home hiding in their closets like little (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)es why someone else picked up a weapon to defend their asses.

George Washington served also and owned other human beings as personal property, so do you consider him a scumbag also.

 

not only did ron paul write articles in the newsletters, he owned the company, was the listed as the editor and signed many of the letters



http://www.conservativesnetwork.com/2011/12/16/who-wrote-the-ron-paul-newsletters-ron-paul-wrote-them-clear-proof/

 

Not sure who "How let" is, but Hitler was a decorated WWI veteran, what he did later has no bearing on that. Hitler = scum.....Wright = scum.

Doesn't matter, Wright is still a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing piece of (*)(*)(*)(*) of the highest order.

Times were different back then, Washington treated his slaves well. Was slavery wrong? Of course it was. Was Washington a scum bag? You decide.

 

Um...ah...ah you just don't understand Ron Paul's positions or something. Ron Paul said he didn't write them so that's all there is to it. That's Ron Paul's position and you just don't understand it. /sarcasm

 

How was the time different, wrong is wrong. So 200 yrs from now when folks look back and point out the wrongs of today the excuse is going to be times were different. Folks followed the same Bible in those days that folks follow today, so did they read a different Bible in those times if that is the book of your choice.

Trying to compare Rev. Wright to Adolf Hitler is a disgrace, but I understand that is how the game is done.

 

Those look to be several different writings. Do you have one of the offensive articles with his signature on it?

Also, Ron Paul is listed as the editor of the Ron Paul Investment Letter. The newsletter containing the offensive material was the Ron Paul Political Report and I would challenge you to find one of those listing him as editor.

 

I really wasn't comparing Hitler to Wright, obviously Wright is not a genocidal maniac, just a plain ole maniac.

The fact that you would place Wright on a pedestal speaks volumes about your character.

 

Sorry but I don't place NO man on a pedestal. BTW what does your character speak of, you will condemn a man who has never harmed another human being but folks that treated other human beings as you would treat cattle or horses are considered as heroes and great men and blah, blah, blah and then the weak ass excuse to condone that behaviour is, "Those times were different". Wrong is wrong no matter what time frame it was in.

 

That attack was not launched by a "conservative " at all. Now you are trying to conflate all attacks with conservatism. Too funny.