Support for gay marriage has fallen after Obergefell

The ones that show that men who have sex with men are more likely not to use protection.

 

So, none?

 

You feel free to present anything that contradicts my claims. I could quote the CDC and it would do nothing to change your mind. You believe what you sooooo desperately want to believe. Keep up the good work and Im sure HIV will continue to increase among homosexual men.

 

HIV is a male disease so who's view endangers people is you by falsely claiming it is only gay men who spread HIV.

Is this a pitch you use to women as to why there really is no reason for you to wear a condom? Are you HIV positive and are desperate to find someone else to blame? There has to be some reason why you incessantly make your false claims.

 

But not a survey? So there are still none

 

Yes a survey. And I told you even quoting the CDC wouldn't convince you. Keep up the good work, ensuring that HIV continues to thrive among homosexuals.

 

I am sorrythat's a false cause. Just because a disease has a higher proclivity among homosexuals does not mean homosexuals are more promiscuous

 

You cant even keep track of what it is that you deny. The survey shows that men who have sex with men are more likely not to use a condom, when compared with men who have sex with women. AND they are more promiscuous because surveys show they are more promiscuous.

 

No it doesn't.

 

Your baseless denials are meaningless.

 

Your misrepresentation of the survey is meaningless.

 

I quoted the CDCs representation of the survey. Thrust your head a little deeper into the sand gay one.

Currently sexually active§§ MSM were significantly more likely than currently sexually active males who had sexual contact only with females to have drunk alcohol or used drugs before last sexual intercourse (38.5% compared with 24.3%) and were significantly less likely to have used a condom during last sexual intercourse (44.3% compared with 70.2%).

 

That is a lie. It said nothing about promiscuity.

I don't see a link. You are a confirmed liar so I don't trust anything you post without one.

 

That's because we are talking about the MSMs tendency to not use condoms, not their tendency to embrace promiscuity. To draw a map for those who are hopelessly lost-

To which YOU replied

The link is still the same as when I quoted the same text from the CDC yesterday.

Thrust your head a little deeper in the sand. Maybe it will all go away.

 

I've asked you this several times before and you ignored me. Even assuming your disputed data point is accurate,

SO WHAT??

 

Higher instance of disease transmission among a small segment of a population doesn't indicate the the population is more promiscuous.

Sorry.

 

Aren't you interested in knowing the cause of the spread of HIV so that it can be stopped? Isn't the truth important to you?

In 2013, 93% of new HIV cases were due to contact with gay and bi men, if you want to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS, then identify the people who have HIV, regulate and monitor their activity, inform their partners - treat it the same way every other public health hazard is treated. Why play this stupid game of "everyone" can get HIV when its a lie.

 

I never claimed it was, sooooooo you can let go of that strawman.

 

Well everyone that has sex with an infected person can.

Most of the people that get it are young. It's a fact that education lowers instance of communicable diseases being spread. The talibornagian fight education regarding homosexuality. We all know the way to end it but nobody will say it out of politeness.

Educate young people and to hell with the backward cultists.

You like it this way, you feel it justifies your prejudice. If people remain ignorantthey keep getting illand you can say your crapthat it's because they are gay. You are as bad as the liberals you claim to despise.

- - - Updated - - -

That's a lie.

 

I know the cause of the spread of HIV. It's a blood borne virus. It's spread by unprotected anal sex, sharing of infected needles, and unprotected vaginal sex. Note that unprotected anal sex is the most dangerous sex act any 2 humans can partake in, regardless of gender. I would not have unprotected anal sex with my wife and I know to an absolute certainty that neither of us have HIV, but because it can cause other issues. The disease has been (somewhat) isolated in the MSM community, even more to the point black and Hispanic MSMs. (Before anyone wants to slam me for racism, that's not racism, it's a fact.)

So, what's the takeaway? Unprotected anal sex is something that basically should never be done, between 2 men, a man and a woman, even a committed monogamous married couple who is certain of their HIV-negative status.

The good news is that it looks like a cure for HIV/AIDS is right around the corner, if/when that happens it will eliminate that danger. But even in the event that happens, unprotected anal sex is still a bad idea, although less risky than today.

"Anyone" who has unprotected anal sex can get HIV, regardless of gender. "Anyone" who has unprotected vaginal sex can get HIV, though it's statistically less likely. But this has nothing to do with bashing gay men, it's just a simple matter of cause and effect.

As far as monitoring and informing partners, while I recommend and respect people (of any gender) who self report STIs of any kind to their partner(s), for anyone else to do so would violate HIPPA, so it simply isn't going to happen.

 

Your baseless claims of a lie are meaningless. ESPECIALLY when you could simply copy and paste this claim of mine where I stated that "Higher instance of disease transmission among a small segment of a population" DOES "indicate the population is more promiscuous." to show it was a lie.

 

All you ever do is make stupid claims and when called on them you change your position and carry on about how somebody needs to waste time picking through your nonsense to prove it's nonsense.

 

LOLOLOL! No, I made the claim Gays are less likely to use a condom, which you called me on and I provided text from the CDC to back up my assertion. So now you would rather talk about promiscuity instead. All which I accurately predicted before I supplied the evidence from the CDC. No amount of evidence would sway you from what you sooooo desperately want to believe

 

http://www.pewforum.org/2015/07/29/graphics-slideshow-changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/

 

Get a grip dixon