Susan Boyle assaulted, harassed by gang of 15 youths

lol, pick up your ball and pout on your way home.

All you need to do is present an argument, without fallacies. Why is that so hard?

 

People can see for themselves that post #323 is a different argument than the one in post # 443.

You did no such thing. Provide evidence for your claim or admit you are lying.

Post a single post from my posting history that shows me stating I believe whites are superior to blacks/browns.

Here's a post from over 3 years ago when I said I do not believe whites to be superior.

Here's another from almost 4 years ago.

Unless you can find something that shows otherwise, you've been refuted.

 

Whose argument? How?

 

Funny, coming from the guy using nothing but false premises and strawman arguments in this thread.

 

no, they can see I shortened it to "racist" instead of typing the whole thing out.

of course I did. Whether you accept it or not is not my problem.

Your posts speak for themselves. Pretending you don't think your race is superior, doesn't fool anyone.

 

the other posters. By pointing out the fallacy correlation = causation.

 

You've said that non-supremacist positions can still make one a racist, and that supremacy is not required to be a racist, and then contradicted yourself.

Your failure to produce evidence to support your argument is noted.

I've literally been saying for years that I don't believe whites are superior to blacks and browns, the complete opposite of your claim. You can't find a single post in my posting history to support your argument. You've failed even worse than you usually do.

 

Except you haven't done that, either.

Since you haven't been able to defend anything you've written, are you waiting for a participation trophy?

 

rather silly comment, as I've not used either in this thread.

 

I've demonstrated how you've used both of these in this thread.

 

no I didn't.

already produced I t.

yet your posting history shows otherwise.

Here's a good example http://politicalforum.com/index.php...he-best-schools.508400/page-2#post-1067673052

Finland is majority white. You are implying whites would have to "slow down" their curriculum for the dumb brown/black folk.

 

lol, huh? I haven't pointed out the correlation = causation fallacy by pointing out the correlation = causation fallacy? WTF?

I've defended every word successfully.

 

actually, you haven't. Which is why it was a silly comment for you to make.

 

I showed otherwise, despite your dismissal.

Which post number?

No it doesn't. That's why you can't produce a single post to support your argument.

That literally says nothing about whites being superior to black and browns.

 

No, you've not shown that.

Nope, you have failed to substantiate a single argument you've made, and have been refuted many times.

 

False, I have shown your false premise and strawman arguments.

 

No, you didn't. I have repeatedly shown you I haven't.

search the thread, for the first time I pointed out his fallacy.

.
of course it does.

then why would they need to "slow down" their curriculum if the whites of finland weren't superior in your view?

 

you literally just quoted me showing that.

nope, I've substantiated everything I've said in this thread.

 

nope. You've simply claimed them. I've corrected you on that claim.

 

I've given actual post numbers of yours that people can view themselves.

You can't even keep your arguments straight. I asked you to produce evidence that I was "lying".

Then produce some evidence.

Because Finnish kids have a different language, culture, and background than those who moved to the country a few years ago to escape whatever 3rd world country they came from, and are going to have an easier time learning information presented by a Finnish teacher than non-Finnish students who may be in the same class as them.

 

Where?

You haven't substantiated a thing, especially your original argument that I supposedly believe whites are superior to blacks/browns.

 

Your original argument in this thread was the premise in which you based all of your follow up arguments, and I have shown that to be false. You are also ascribing to me a position I do not hold, which is a strawman.

 

which show me using the shorthand "racist" instead of typing the whole thing out.

Then I misunderstood what you were asking. Apologies.

already given.

why are you assuming they are from a 3rd world country, and why do you assume if they come from a 3rd world country, they are stupid?

 

in the post you quoted.

of course I have

 

actually, you haven't. Your posts show this. Why do you insist on pretending? You realize nobody is fooled by this right?

but you do hold it, so it's not a strawman.