The Sciences of Time - Does Time Have A Beginning?

LOL!

 

All those things are as valuable as the contents and what it offers. "Science" is not an entity that can treat people badly but judging by my experiences with you here, giving opinion will be seen as mistreatment and make you feel upset. If you actually wanted exposure for your ideas it is quite simple to achieve and people such as myself could assist you, but as you are unable or unwilling to present even a synopsis the entire process cannot even begin. Until you are able to at least discuss scientific principles without debasing them you will be seen as ignorant and pointless to education.

 

For someone that claims to be English your use of the language fails to achieve even a mediocre standard.

 

Did we also "invent" distance and height and depth?

 

To start a conversation using the word ''for'' , missing out a comma after English , I score you a F- .

 

Science forums are devised for plagiarism , ''they'' tell people they are wrong to put them off . I presented to you :


(n>n) = (n<n)


Do I really need to explain that ''n'' is neutral ?

Do I really need to explain ''Gods'' equation and the beginning of time in space ?

I am a genius and I have plenty of ways to raise money if money was my only interest ......

Perhaps I should look at promoting myself in other countries around the world ...

 

Thank you for confirming your absence of English subject matter knowledge.

https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/can-i-start-a-sentence-with-a-conjunction

 

Science is not a belief system; it's a methodology.

 

Regardless , starting a conversation with ''for'' reads terribly unless preaching . For the eye of the beholder is thy reader .

 

No ! there is many fairy stories in science without method and objectivity .

 

In other words you have nothing to substantiate your bovine excrement!

Got it!

 

Such as?

 

Ok ! you asked for it , you really should not try to ''gangland'' me , I just get even by destroying more science .


How about we start with the expanding Universe and the Hubble red-shift ?


The space that is not expanding !

 

The space that is not expanding !

 

How about we BEGIN by you trying to correct these English language errors in your own posts?

 

I am writing on a forum , you are a troll .



If you want me go MK ultra on you , I have no problem with that troll.

 

You are the one trolling the science forum and it is patently obvious to EVERYONE reading your disingenuous bovine excrement that you are NOT any of the things that you have claimed to be.

Game, set and match!

 

Nice try ! I will inform you I am a Professor of neurological studies , your mediocre mind games are as futile as present science defense of dogma .

Light traversing through the vacuum of space is at its maximum limit of expansion , how do you assume that red-shift is stretched light when the opposite of compression is true ?

The frequency of ''red'' light is a shorter wave-length than the light that traverses through space !

NEXT!

 

What field of space science are you qualified in?

 

Qualified simply means a piece of paper you get for remembering to put the answers you are taught by education to remember in your exams . I am ''qualified'' in all sciences ! I have no paperwork and neither did I finish school or go to college .
I have studied and thought for over a decade , I know my shizzzz......

 

I'm looking for a job / work as a freelance writer , working from home . I can advise on many different things including politics .

I mean , it's not like I created invisible .

 

Are you familiar with the word braggadocio?
Not one of my colleagues would ever claim to be qualified in "all sciences".nor have any given themselves the title of Professor.

 

Objectively your feelings are incorrect , if I was arrogant I would not be asking for just a job , I would be asking for billions . My boastful nature is passion and pride for what I have educated myself in and the knowledge I now have . I can demonstrate Einstein is incorrect in parts of his notions , I have new science , I think that qualifies me , to call myself a professor . Additionally my earlier ideas on force fields etc , is possible . Wouldn't you like jails with no bars required because there is a force field door ?

I'm talking some Star Trek turned into realism here !

 

Objectively I'm spot on.
~fini~

 

The truth is , neurological limits are based on believing in limitations . In an infinite spatial void limits become without limits , what this means is that anything anybody could ever imagine , is possible .
Your not spot on , you just forgot what science passion is and are unaware of neurological self achievement rewards . Am I not entitled to be happy about my own work ?
It is not a I'm better than you , I am humble but also proud. Boasting my ''smarts'' is advertising , confidence .