The Sciences of Time - Does Time Have A Beginning?

Space responds to gravitational fields and can be bent. I believe Hawking.

Something that has characteristics can't be nothing.

 

Now if only there existed a void such as you propose!

 

Time has always existed and will always exist!

Mankind has come up with a series of ways to MEASURE time as it pertains to ourselves but they are just measurements of something that has ALWAYS EXISTED and will always exist.

 

You can conjure up an imaginary void in your mind but it does not exist in reality!

Next!

 

If we could absolutely shield a volume of space from energy , what is left inside the volume ?

Hint:Void /empty space


Quite clearly most of you are really outdated science minded people .


It would be pointless to continue and explain (n>n) = (n<n) because I am just not sure mediocre minds can handle the truth .

 

The infinite void exists....

 

You are entitled to your personal opinion but the rest of the scientific world will continue to deal with the actuality of the Space-TIME Continuum.

 

Only in mediocre minds!

 

Remove the CMBR and everything else from a volume of space ,


What is left ?

Demonstrated ..........!

 

What does "Space-Change" mean?

Is it another way of saying Spacetime?

 

I am English , we don't do make believe science .

 

Okay...so all we need to do for your position to be valid is remove everything real?

Not much of a position to remain in reality.

 

I am American, we don't do make believe in science.

 

All's you need to comprehend is that the infinite void is real and reality . It exists as n-dimensions of nothingness and space-time is the energy overlay , that simple .

 

Yet your still using giant fireworks to travel into space ....please continue with your primitive transport .

 

(n>n) = (n<n)

If anyone wants to fund the book , I will explain in the book .

 

You don\t know that and neither do I because there is no way to observe anything outside of the known universe.

 

And you of course use quantum fusion thrust that you make up and imagine....so you are not some mediocre mind.

 

There is fine logic and facts that demonstrate infinite is an axiom . I do not need to observe to envision , neither did Einstein , Tesla , Neils Bohr etc .

I share my birthday with Neils coincidentally .

 

We really need an asylum sub-forum here and a mod devoted to moving those posts that go beyond creative imagination into Batshlt crazy to maintain the integrity of a science forum.

 

The only way to get a space drive to possibly work is by knowing the physics involved . I understand physics beyond conventional physics therefore my work may lead to a space drive . A space drive is only a fraction of my ideas which use axiom thought .
I have advanced Einsteins work etc, I know more about the Universe than most because of my revolutionary envisions .

i.e I am a bad ass thinker

 

I can see that you have a mediocre mind and are delusional , subjective to your own neurological memories . Often a weak defense , accuses the poster of having MH issues , I am more sane than memories alone .

 

Then you know we mostly use "Giant Fireworks" in order to get into space, not to travel in it....right?

If what you show in this forum is a sampling...you are actually a bad thinker...A$$.

 

(n>n) = (n<n)

Genius @ me .UK

I understand inertia , you could climb a ladder into space , escape velocity is simply .........

Ha, I nearly give you too much free information then , I have not spent over a decade learning to give it up for free .

 

Disagree, DT. I agree with us coming up with ways to measure it, but we have also decided there is such a thing as time, to measure.