Trump Proposes to End Anchor Babies...

"it will be glorious." bill carson

 

Leftist expect others do the Job?

70% US economy comes from congregational district where Lefties Reside and send their hard earn money to RED state for food stamps.

 

There is literally zero chance any federal court will take Trump's side on this one. Not even judges that he appointed.

I guess Trump just wants to keep on failing.

 

He has no intention of it ever happening.

He just knows he can get away with anything. His followers bought his NFT's, they will buy anything.

 

They always leave something out or make something up, which gave us things like unfettered abortion, gay marriage and the current state of trans-whatever, men pretending to be women/competing in women's sports and mentally ill story hour.

And just to be clear, I don't care if they vote for it in their blue state, but don't try to force that degeneracy on the nation via activist courts/no constitutional foundation.

 

What do you think "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means?

 

It means people who do not have diplomatic immunity.

 

Yes, i was just wondering what the poster i quoted thought it meant.

 

Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Which part do you say doesn't endorse jus soli?

 

It's pretty sad and pathetic how Trump clearly does not understand the 14th amendment. It's just evidence that Trump is indeed a moron and an idiot.

 

Only by sovereign citizens. If you're not possessed of diplomatic immunity, you're subject to the jurisdiction when you're within our borders.

 

For the love of christ, can you not read the many aforementioned references to the 2 part citizenship requirement?

The phrase, "AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof" has a meaning. The meaning as written in 1866.

 

So people are excited about Trump promises? Was nothing learned from the last time around? Well, at least one person has...and that would be Trump. He learned that he could promise anything and never have to deliver. And his followers made excuses for him.

 

You going by El Bey now or something? A boat captain are we? Not lost at sea?
Gonna rant about a fringed flag next?

 

What was the definition of an illegal immigrant in 1866? This will be funny.

 

If it's automatic and understood, then why was it stated in the amendment?

 

If someone isn't subject to the jurisdiction of the US, then how could we criminally charge them for something? Either illegal immigrants are subject to the jurisdiction of the US, or you can't arrest them.

 

We're not talking about illegal aliens who illegally crossed the border. We're talking about babies born on United States soil.

 

Why did you cherry pick it and leave out

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." If their parents reside in another country and only here for a visit then the child born resides in another country and not here.

But I am all for an Amendment to make it clear and would even consider it applying to only children of persons here illegally including awaiting an adjudication of their status.

 

All babies born in the USA are American citizens, unless they are the children of diplomats with diplomatic immunity.

Doesn't matter if their parents are tourists or have a work visa, or even here illegally.

 

Yes, who gives birth to them? If their mothers are subject to the jurisdiction of the US, the newly born child would be as well.

 

According to that "logic," amendments shouldn't exist. Congrats on being the first person on the forums to be on record as opposing the bill of rights, I guess.

 

The tax codes are setup to benefit the rich. What are Democrats doing to reform the codes? Nothing because lots of rich Democrats benefit from the codes.

 

I don't see how but go for it.

 

the right wont let them, and the right keeps holding America hostage to get more tax cuts for the rich