UN spends 4 times more on Palestinian refugees per person than a Syrian ..

If that is your opinion(its not mine) then enjoy it.

 

No you are making it up, take ownership of your views Dutch.

 

That occurred along time ago.

 

Always do.

 

Then do not put words in others mouths.

Now can you explain why the Palestinians get four times more than other refugees?

 

No fool like an arrogant one,
"
According to the Arab League general Safwat:

Despite the fact that skirmishes and battles have begun, the Jews at this stage are still trying to contain the fighting to as narrow a sphere as possible in the hope that partition will be implemented and a Jewish government formed; they hope that if the fighting remains limited, the Arabs will acquiesce in the fait accompli. This can be seen from the fact that the Jews have not so far attacked Arab villages unless the inhabitants of those villages attacked them or provoked them first"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1947–48_Civil_War_in_Mandatory_Palestine

When "innocent Palestinian civilians" attack towns they become militants and their homes become "barracks".

 

Great PR

 

They can all live in golden houses for all I care but the issue here is the Arab focus in the UN, not out of love for "Mordechai" but out of hate for "Haman" as a Jewish say goes, meaning they immortelize Palestinian "suffering" over all else to harm Israel, Syrian refugees are just among others.

 

No. I cannot logically explain it. They really should not, for refugee is a refugee is a refugee.

 

Everyone makes was against innocent Palestinian civilians - Iraqis, Saudis, Jordanians, Kuwaitis... only the lazies do not pick on them Palestinians. Hey, did you know Kuwait expelled, terrorized, ethnically cleansed hundreds of thousands Palestinians because of venerable Yassir Arafat' sighting with Sadam Hussein?

Why do you single out Israel, when fella Arabs made more Palestinian refugees than Israel ever did?

 

You really don't know anything about the history of Isreal do you?

5 Arab countries known as the Arab League attacked Israel

Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon

Plus foreign fighters from the Muslim Brotherhood, Yemen, Pakistan and Sudan

The new State of Israel was fighting for its life

 

A security council resolution was not required

Israel accepted the peaceful UN partition and the Arabs did not

 

Start with this:
https://unispal.un.org/pdfs/Cmd5479.pdf

 

They stole it, by force an terrorism, simple truth.

 

Simple Arab denial...., as long as you/they reject our right and deny UN past decisions - we'll reject thier rights and UN present decisions and let the strong side win. obviously we cannot agree on simple matters why bother with complicated ones.

 

Don't be bloody silly! Countries belong to the people who have always lived in them, in this case the Palestinians. Khazars belong in what was the old Khazar Kingdom.

 

Once the Palestinians declred war it was either Jews or Arabs to be driven out - by force or by choice at an advancing army, the only way this could have been solved without anyone drven away was following 181 resolution, if you support that war then you should know ppl die or run in wars.

It only blockaded it since 2006, they got their aid long before that and the conditions are bad because it a pirate bay controlled by terrorists....what would you think will happen ?

You mean bulidings get blown in wars and concerete shipments for tunnels is withheld, that's another shocker, you figured we'll just take their terror attacks peacfully like in 1947 where we were supposed to be driven out but in no way to drive them out, neh......you confuse us with Christians, the other chick stuff is theirs.

True and that's the closest you get to the issue at hand, why spend so much over a smaller part of refugees ? why have Muslim countries that took Pal refugees in keep them as such for decades instead of assimilating them into their society? why pay for them and their childern and so on for decades more ? the answer is because it serves a political purpose and allows those countries to ignore the refugees.

You know it wont happen and while it doesnt no reason to mark Pal refugees as better than the rest.

Their right for self determination was already given in 1947 at resulotion 181 which they rejected, since then till now it is only a matter of their choice and they chose to win more land before they do, so again its not hat they are prevented from that right - its a border issue and for that they are willing to live off UN wellfare for decades to come, I think this will slowly change now, already Abu Mazen stopped electricity to Gaza which means the cake got smaller already.

 

You're being silly, Jews been there "always" too, their numbers increased legally during Ottomans and Mandate just like Arab had immigration (due to Zionist investments), when they came to establish a state they were not just ready but more than capable than your Arabs, in the end those that wanted it most - won.

 

At no time did the Jews have anything like a majority before 1948, despite massive illegal immigration. You came, you saw, you stole.

 

No a bunch of Zionist thieves stole others land, partition never happened the zionist scum stole the land and declared independence. Now if you claim the land was not stolen show it

 

Jews have always been there in France too. Zionists claiming that? Zionists are not Jews - they are very nasty Hitler-imitators in search of a Volkish Reichlette all of their own. In the end those with the most money to bribe UN members 'won' for the time being, as did their Great Model, the Fuhrer. Here's to the next fuhrerbunker!

 

Majority within what ? a state you claim existed but didnt ? the whole purpose of the mandate was to create states, your continues rejection of that partitation is the fuel for the contious fued and the reason for the Palestinian condition.

 

The purpose of the Mandate was to prepare the local population for self-government. Earlier Balfour, short of money for the War, issued a meaningless promise of a 'national home' (whatever that was) in a territory he did not control, for Jews. The purpose of the Mandate was certainly not to create a 'Jewish' state on Palestinian land.

 

No, but if France as a state will crumble and the UN will issue a mandate to govern the land then Christians will have an issue with the Muslims there in case they demand indipendance

lol

 

Common knowledge for all but the most pathetically uninformed. For them-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_Declaration_of_Independence