Unarmed Kid Murdered (part 6)

Oh good grief....you're obsessed with the liberal media myth.......

 

9 times out of 10 ... He's White when it's convenient for him, especially when he's in the company of Whites and talking about his favorite hunting targets.

 

If there was evidence of a fight they police would not have had grounds under the law...Florida does not arrest Hispanics for defending themselves.

The issue is self defense. Either he was attacked or he was not. If not arrest is in order. If attacked, there are no grounds aside from PC considerations of skin color.

 

Their statements show Zimmerman being on top of Martin seconds after shooting him. Cutcher was one of the witnesses the cops tried to "correct" when she said she heard Trayvon crying for help. That one person's claims does not line up with all the other witnesses or the evidence.

There are people trying to claim the 13 year old witness said he saw Zimmerman on the ground when he said he didn't know who was on the ground but saw there was no fight. There are a LOT of articles on this so be careful what you claim.....

 

Justice based on color, ethnicity, sexual orientation etc is not 'justice' but political correctness written into law.

 

You're wrong. As has been stated a million times just because there is a fight doesn't mean he has the right to blow the kid away.

 

Thank you for sharing the video.. it was good..

 

Hay Wake up ...

The Story is about a Man Shooting and Killing a Kid.

The Media didn't pull any trigger.

 

And of course, you were there... Also, according to the police report, Zimmerman's face was blooded. So while wrestling on the ground, Zimmerman beat on his own face in a grand scheme to setup a murder.

Makes sense to me.. enough of this kangaroo court. Time to bring out the electric chair.

 

The media didn't pull the trigger, but they are trying to judge the hispanic in public with all the wrong facts. How hard is it to find out a person's race???????????? Its not news reporting.. its hate mongering...

 

Under the law he is presumed to have a right to defend himself and all he needs do is say 'I was in fear for my life'...If that is found to be untrue, then a subsequent arrest may be in order, but as of today, all we have a rumors and claims...If the victim was white and all other things were the same, the very folk screaming for the shooters head would be defending him as a poor misunderstood Hispanic and the white as a probable racist...

I was not aware until today that there was a priority list of the lefts victim groups...(1) Blacks (2) women (3) Hispanics (4) gays, etc...you may shuffle the list as you desire but obviously, based on the comments so far, Black trumps Hispanic.

 

The shooter DECLARE his bias against "young back men" several times over the last year, and specifically on his call to the police.

The race of the shooter is immaterial. . . it is his bias and his profiling of this innocent, unarmed kid that led to the shooting. . .not the shooter's own race or his "fear" of this specific kid, or he would have stayed in his car as he was told by the police to do.

 

I don't think anyone at this point cares what race he is, unless you think White people are the only ones who can be racist and well that's just...racist. Any race can racial profile another and the whole reason this story is huge because this guy was still walking on the streets not even being charged or tried for the crime when there are so many unanswered questions. Let a jury decide his innocence or guilt.

 

thats nonsense....they have no idea of knowing if he was trying to mug the kid and after a scuffle he killed him....would THAT be self defense?

they can arrest him and let the DA decide if he wants to bring charges.

 

none of which are at issue....

facts are a kid is dead after being followed and confronted by an armed man who ignored police instruction

 

yes liberals dont believe even hispanics should get to murder black kids and get away with it....

you needed that explained?

 

Every single time you, Sky and the rest of the liberals call this murder with no witnesses to the actual confrontation and claim Zimmerman killed him because he was black.

It doesn't get any more racist than that.

 

Yep, because at this point, we finally find out he's Hispanic...

Agreed, Let a jury decide his innocence or guilt.. Not the hate mongering liberal media who couldn't even get this Hispanics race right...

 

Most muggers do not call the police in advance...

No, the most interesting thing here is not a possible wrongful shooting but the hierarchy of the lefts victim groups...What would be forgiven or even vigorously defended by members of one group are vilified if the fellow is of another.

We do not know enough here to have a position aside from knee jerk race consciousness.

 

The 'Fact' is if the kid dead was white, the folk screaming the loudest for Justice would be dead silent.

 

Finally, you got it!

Do you finally understand that ZIMMERMAN was the instigator. . .that he went after that kid and that the kid:
wasn't doing anything illegal or suspicious
had an excellent reason to be there and BELONG there . . .he was not intruding on anyone or anything
wasn't armed or displaying any aggressive behavior
didn't provoke Zimmerman in anyway. . .but that Zimmerman provoked him.

In fact, the Florida senator who sponsored that bill was on TV just an hour ago stating that this law didn't apply in this instance, because Martin was not in anyway an intruder and Zimmerman was the one who pursued Martin. and. He was confident that the Grand Jury would take the proper actions to bring this case to a jury trial.

 

well your confidence is some alternate reality is entertaining....but not relevant.

 

Nope. . .that statement was made by several of us at least 3 days ago. . .go back to previous threads!