Unarmed woman is shot by Police in Capitol. The People Who Scream ‘Police Brutality’ Don’t Care.

I guess you would also want a source for the claim that it's possible that another black man COULD become President!

I was only disputing that he was responsible, which is what you claimed. You did NOT claim that he was only PARTLY responsible!

No I didn't. In post 1847 I said that there is no alternative meaning to "bomb" in the context of your airport scenario because you said "bomb" NOT "DA bomb." Whereas there are TWO possibilities to saying "FIGHT" in the context of a political speech such as Trump's January 6 speech. Link to post 1847: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ty’-don’t-care.583573/page-74#post-1072992688

 

I see no argument here that attacks my comments. So you loose.

I got 3 sources that attack JW accuracy. That's enough to call it trash.

 

I showed JW is simply not to be trusted at all.

 

You're distracting, because you lost the argument.

Your entire argument that it is not clear what Donald could have meant, is your argument how Donald is not responsible at all for what happened.
You just flip flopped on that, because you lost the argument.

 

No.... you loose... you can not prove JW wrong at all... you just keep running back to your fake fact checkers who have a bad reputation much worse than JW....

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/politifact

https://winteryknight.com/2021/03/2...politifact-unbiased-a-review-of-past-rulings/

https://www.politifactbias.com/

https://www.liveaction.org/news/politifact-misleads-rating-roe-abortion-deaths/

https://www.politifactbias.com/2019/12/politifact-ratings-arent-scientific-or.html

https://censortrack.org/organization/factcheck-org

https://reinventingwildfire.com/is-factcheck-org-reliable/

https://capitalresearch.org/article/dishonest-fact-checkers/

 

Prove JW's article is wrong

 

I trashed that JW rather well as a fake news source, and you got no other source.

That pjmedia also mentions JW as it's source.
And you were not able to trash my fact checking site.
I'm not disturbed by your sources saying it's leaning to the left.
That doesn't mean it's wrong. Not by a long shot.

 

I know I will piss some people off but I have drifted on my opinion But Ashley Babbit caused her own death the same way George Floyd did ,

 

and you got no other source.... see post #1930

 

Why should I have a source, when I trashed yours? lol

 

Okay, so you agree that it's possible that another black man COULD become President!

This is a separate part of the discussion which is about Trump saying "FIGHT." I'm not denying that Trump MEANT to promote the lie that the election was stolen. He clearly did MEAN to promote this lie! This made him PARTLY responsible for the capitol riot!

 

And there you go.
You agree cheeto man bad is indeed to blame for his roll for the assault on the core of the US democracy.

 

I contribute to Judicial Watch because they attempt to find the truth and hold criminal government bureaucrats accountable.

To keep things in perspective, I've held Donald Trump in low regard since 1975 and have never voted for him, will never vote for him.

JW has been right about many things, including Russiagate and more. The government has been out of control long before Sleepy Joe's minions stole the election last year.

 

I never suggested that he was NOT to blame for his ROLE in January 6! And you said "ROLL." And you accuse ME of having bad English!

 

You've been knee jerking for months, by suggesting we do not know what he meant by fight for your country, noting that it was Giuliani who said to have a trial by combat and not Donald,... casually forgetting he was paid by Donald to say that on a stage that Donald build for him, while Donald stood next to him. With that you have been suggesting that Donald is not to blame.

Between you and me, it's you who needs help to get words or figure of speech explained.
That's of a whole different level of spelling words correctly.

 

Yeah, because we DO NOT in fact know what he meant by FIGHT! You admit that!

He is NOT to blame! He is PARTLY to blame! But he did not order those pieces of human waste to storm the Capitol!

Says the person who said "ROLL" instead of ROLE!

 

Uh... there is no "we" in here. It's all you. You couldn't prove your point and so can only admit Donald is partially to blame for the attack on the Capitol by his fascists.

 

It's a plain and simple FACT that we DO NOT in fact know what he meant by FIGHT!

You AGREE that Donald is partially to blame for the attack on the Capitol!

 

I already replied to this in my previous post, and you're not responding to this.

You mean, you caved in.. since your arguments about what Donald said are irrelevant. He said what he said and his fascist crowed responded to what he and his lawyer told them to do... as in fight like hell and have a trial by combat.

 

NONE of your replies change the FACT that we DO NOT in fact know what he meant by FIGHT!

What did I "cave in" on exactly?

No, neither Trump nor his lawyer told them to break into the Capitol!

 

already responded in post 1942.

Donald's rally was called "stop the steal rally", where he said to go fight like hell or else lose your country, and he paid his lawyer to say that they should have a trial by combat... so that was deffo referring to attack the Capitol. It's so dumbly obvious that this must by your last incredible desperate trolling twitch.

 

There's no evidence that Trump paid him SPECIFICALLY to say "trial by combat."

Your assumption.

There's nothing to prove! It's a plain and simple FACT that we DO NOT in fact know what he meant by FIGHT! NONE of your replies change the FACT that we DO NOT in fact know what he meant by FIGHT!

 

Far more important: Donald hasn't backed down to what he paid his lawyer to say.

"stop the steal" was the entire theme, and that so called "steal' was happening in the Capitol.
Hence it's not assuming anything.

you can't prove your point!

 

Good to see that you agree that there's no evidence that Trump paid him to say "trial by combat."

What does this have to do with the ATTACK on the capitol?

There's nothing to prove!

 

The evidence is that Donald paid his lawyer to hold a speech at the even that Donald organized, and Donald never expressed any kind of dismay over the speech of his lawyer.
That is Donald agreeing with his lawyer, while you got absolutely zero to rebuke it.

everything

so don't bring things up that you can't prove.