Virginia ends CCW reciprocity with 25 states

Twice I took an oath to defend the constitution against all enemies, be they Americans or foreigners. those who push for federally imposed background checks are such enemies of the Constitution . You never proved anything Ron. Your posts on this board have been devoid of rational proof

 

haha!!!

I PMed you all of your calls for violence, from the other forum.

you didn't deny them, and you did justify them.

 

what are you babbling about. this forum is this forum. are you so afraid that you use another handle on another board

and yes, I find people who want to violate the constitution to be "enemies of the constitution"

don't you?

 

unlike you, I have not called for the murder of politicians who advocate for and vote for new gun laws.

 

Nor have I Ron-and I want you to prove I have

 

you have said the following:

"the people most wanting handgun bans are generally the people most likely to need shooting by honest citizens."


"the best thing to keep politicians in line is them knowing if they rape the rights of the righteous, an honest patriot might kill them"


"I am serious-people who want to rape our rights need to be shot, different situations require different weapons"


"to shoot people who want to take our rights away is a good reason"


"I said those who impose laws that cause honest people to be jailed for merely owning once lawful weapons ought to be shot. and more importantly, those who push and work for the passage of such oppression to be shot"


"those who advocate and lobby to enact an obvious violation of the constitution are legitimate and primary targets if the violation leads to innocent citizens being jailed, killed or deprived of their property. In fact the cops who are forced to enforce such travesties should be the last target, its the advocates who should be killed first since they are acting on their free will rather than merely following orders"

 

waiting for proof Ron

 

i already posted all of it.

look up.

those are your quotes

do you now disavow those statements?

 

none of the stuff you posted even remotely supports your false claims

 

in those quotes you advocate deadly violence against politicians who support and vote for new gun laws that bring jail for possessing once legal firearms.

 

Post up or cease and desist. BTW what do you think your praise of John Brown suggests? he took up arms against the government and you are whining that someone might have "threatened" politicians?

 

don't see any links to those posts and those aren't threats and you didn't supply the context

very very dishonest on your part

 

It is pretty ironic that you laud John Brown on the one hand, and condemn the use of armed resistance on the other.

 

I pointed that out and Ron was unwilling to actually link these alleged quotes from me so that the context could be seen or so others could see if he actually truthfully quoted me. But its funny that he is in love with a figure who engaged in armed rebellion against the USA and then he has kittens over suggestions that if the government starts breaking down doors and attacking gun owners, people should resist such a dictatorship

 

If I condemned the use of armed resistance against ACTUAL instances of tyranny and oppresion, I wouldn't be quoting John Brown in my sig, now would I?

However, I will not ever accept threats of violence against politicians and others who advocate for and vote for new gun laws that impose jail time.

For example, I fully support UBC that has minimum jail sentences for selling a gun without a background check and that gun is then used to commit a crime.

even longer jail time if that person you sold the gun to turned out to be a convict or wanted for a crime.

should I or a politician that supports my views be shot? some seem to think so.

- - - Updated - - -

I PMed you the links to these posts months ago.

I shall do it again.

 

if you cannot link those posts of mine to THIS board, you are not being truthful

either post a link to a quote of mine on this board or give it a rest

 

are you denying you made those statements on another board?

it really doesn't matter WHERE you said those things, as they are YOUR comments, calling for deadly violence against politicians who support and vote for laws that give jail time to folks who possess guns that were once legal but become illegal, and they fail to remove them from their possession.

 

are you claiming you are a stalker Ron. I want you to prove I have made statements on this board.

 

stalker? no.

I am a member on that board under another name.

you showed up here one day, and continued your war against those who support stronger gun laws.

 

this board is this board. and that is all that matters. that you aren't honest enough to be the same board to board, I have no idea what you are talking about

 

Virginia did the right thing.

we should UBS and 1 handgun per month purchase limits.

and confiscate guns from those who violate those laws, and throw them in prison if they sell a gun to a criminal.

 

why not throw people in prison who use guns to hurt others

oh and those who lie on the 4473 form

you seem to want to throw people in prison but not those who actually misuse weapons.

and why should honest people be limited to one handgun per month. I just bought my wife and my son each a handgun.

the VA AG is a turd and is mad that the GOP majority in his state is pro gun


and you should go around trying to throw people in jail

 

it should be illegal to sell a gun without a background check.

if YOU sell a gun to someone without a background check, contrary to the law, and that gun is then used in a crime or that gun was sold to a criminal, YOU should go to jail.

 

why? you haven't hurt anyone

Look, we get the fact you want to create as many laws as possible to turn people who don't use guns in a harmful manner into criminals because you want to ban gun ownership but why not punish those who actually misuse guns

or is it that you actually don't want to actually punish real criminals and your jihad is against gun owners

 

He is an anti gun jihadist for sure.
I can prove it.
I asked him if his goal was to restrict firearms or reduce gun violence and he refused to answer, he just deflected.
Then I asked him if we could reduce gun violence without gun control. would he drop the gun control efforts. He refused to answer.