What is wrong with abortion in the early stages of pregnancy?

Well it seems that it is you who is stomping her feet. You know you are full of shiite and you are scrambling because I called you out. It is fun to watch.

 

Even if the pro abortion view is a slim majority, it is still a majority.
Even if the pro abortion view was not a majority it is still disagreement among experts.

Homicide law has nothing to do with abortion in the early stages because no living human exists.

In order to kill "a human" that human has to exist and be living.

Only once there is a concensus (large majority), of folks that are considered qualified to make that determination, that a zygote is " a living human" should the law get involved IMO.

What is not opinion is the fact that it is a logical fallacy to claim that because some group of folks defined a zygote as a human that this is an argument for the zygote being human.

 

We all know a fetus is a living human being.

 

In the later stages of pregnancy I would agree !

Not at least until it has a functional brain though.

 

Well that is just assinine. A human being at all developmental stages is still a human being. To suggest otherwise is idiotic.

 

No one has suggested that a human being is not a human being LOL.

What is idiotic is for someone to claim that " A human being is a human being" as support for something being a human being.

even though this circular argument has been shown pointed out numerous times.

It is not idiotic to make a mistake .. a true fool is one who keeps making the silly mistake over and over again even after being shown the error.

 

Well junior, tell me why a fetus isn't a human being. Why is a human being at that developmental stage less than a human being.

Yes you have said that, now back it up.

 

Most laws are irrational

 

Wrong .. again.

Darn your reading ability is poor. I do not use the term "human being"

 

Oh, speaking of irrational, I would like bacon, grits, toast and 3 chickens, over easy for breakfast.

Since a fetus is a human, then an egg is a chicken, I do love to add an extra chicken to my cake mix, it makes it so much richer.

 

Right you use your own undefined manufactured terminology of "living human"?

You are right, I should have ignored you months ago because you make too much crap up to supposedly back up your assertions.

 

You do more to help your opposition than they could ever do to help themselves, please keep posting!

 

LOL I use terms other than "living human" it is hilarious that you have a problem understanding the term though.

I also use the term "a human" because it is technically correct.

The term "living human" distinguishes between a living human and a dead human.

If we are defending the life of "a human" it is important to use clear language don't you think ?

Terms such as "human life", "Pro life", are unclear because they could mean something other than "a human"

What would you prefer I use other to denote a human that is alive ?

 

Well it is crypyic at best. A toenail is a living human clump of cells.

Actually the term living human being would be correct.

Human what? Human chest hair? Human fingernail?

Absolutely, which is why I consider your posts dishonest and often outright lies.

I use "human being" what is your problem with this widely accepted and used terminology?

 

Wrong

in the phrase "living human" Human is a noun.

"living human cells" Human is an adjective

Both are fine but why use the extra word ? It is redundant and not needed.

Living human being = Living human

You really need to figure out the difference between a noun and an adjective.

Name one lie

I am fine with the term but personally feel no need to use two words when one will suffice.

Funny though: I do not see anything resembling a zygote in that definition.

Last time I checked the zygote was not a Homo sapien, and is not distinguished from other animals by superior mental development, it does not talk, and does not stand upright.

What on earth makes you think that a zygote is a human being ?