When is an abortion NOT an abortion? Focusing on two weeks post conception

So why is it not called "fetal killing" instead of "fetal homicide"?

 

Yes it IS bigotry when anyone would restrict others from voting because they have a differing position. Too bad you are not capable of grasping that, so instead have to resort to condescending tripe.

 

I really do not care what it is called, read the text of the law.

 

in people like yourself, yes. Not a problem for the rest.

 

LOL. Nice dodge. I'm impressed.

 

If a fetus were a person, "fetal homicide" laws would be unnecessary. We have always had homicide laws for human beings.

 

Nothing has changed the law is against fetal homicide and not abortion. The last I checked abortion is legal and you will have to learn to deal with it.
So unless you have learned to deal with your own issues nothing has changed at all.

 

Because it is called fetal homicide. If you want to know why ask the lawmakers that named it. There is a difference after all.

 

What you are really upset about is that I don't agree with the narrow minded thinking that you posted and since you're wrong and proved wrong by the way you don't like it.

 

Ah so you admit that you either do not know what the language of the law is but are unwilling to admit it.

 

Exactly, but ignorance of the obvious is so hard to overcome by some.

 

No we are only talking about yours here. I am not the one who opposes voting by those who do not agree with me.

 

No one here hears voices in their heads besides those that believe in a god that leads them around by the nose. The rest of us are normal.

 

are led around by the nose by a god you don't believe in. Enjoy.

 

They worship at the throne of science they don't understand, and laugh at us because we beleive in something we cannot see. It is comical when you think about it.

 

That coming from the guy who claims that there are no subject matter experts. I guess for you the only valid science can come form people who follow religious dogma.

No religious belief is not laughed at, it is the hypocrisy you and many others exhibit in the name of your religion along with the willful ignorance and dishonesty that is the subject of disdain.

 

I do enjoy and you follow.

 

People who believe, and are led by someone that can't be seen are schizophrenic and there are medications for that problem.

 

That will pass.

No, I do not follow your god.

 

I don't have a god. Nor do you for that matter you just think you do.

 

I know you think so, but you're kidding yourself.

 

All the evidence is on my side that the god theory is just that. Have fun.

 

There is nothing theoretical about it; and you may rest assured your god is perfectly content to have you remain oblivious to his presence, at least for the time being.

 

This is not a discussion about God, and whether you believe in a God. Move it along, folks, and go back to discussing the OP.

Thank you.

 

The thought police eh? What if the forum members want to discuss the religious implications.