Why do you people keep asking the same wrong question?

If you feel that gay parents are substandard at raising children, you must feel that said children should be forcibly removed from the
care of gay parents for their own protection.

I guess you must be volunteering to be the agent who will remove said children.

Can I watch when you try to remove the biological child of a lesbian mother? Can we put the video on ... well ... everywhere. Can we show you in the hospital? Do you support the right to arm lesbian mothers?

Or is your post just another in poorly-thought out rants against gay people?

 

Wouldn't be a bad idea, I suppose, but it doesn't interest me just now.

 

I don't see why God's opinion matters. What does he know anyway? If hod's a homophobe, then hail satan, I'll gladly go to hell.

Granted, I don't believe in God or Satan, but I'm trying to provocatively frame this question: Even if there is a god, why does the limitation of human biology matter?

 

Oh please, explain in detail how a same sex couple is in any way inferior to a heterosexual couple in child rearing. Please compare and contrast point by point what happens in a heterosexual household that cannot happen in a homosexual household.

 

So, from your post, we'll just put you down as one anti-gay dude who wants to steal children from their biological mothers. Pretty sick.

 

Be afraid.

Be afraid!

Be very afraid!

Just don't ask why because it can't be explained!

Unfortunately, real life contradicts your fantastical scary story. The sky still stands, and in fact has not even moved at all, in the states that have legalized same-sex marriage. As has always been the case, your side of the argument is nothing but hot air and paranoia not backed up by any type of facts, or anything at all for that matter which isn't based on a doom-and-gloom prediction about what same-sex marriage will do, completely ignoring that same-sex marriage is already happening and none of the doom-and-gloom predictions have come true.

 

Considering who my father was hell yes. Two loving parents no matter that sex trumps one loving and one not of different sexes.

 

Lol.... good luck with that.

In the words of Vader: "The hate-filled anger is ridiculously overblown with this one".

 

Not arguing with you, but single people can legally raise children. Marriage has nothing to do with it.

While I believe the best upbringing comes from a stable, loving, male/female household.... that doesn't mean that gays can't responsibly raise a child.

I would rather a child receive an upbringing from loving gay parents, than from many, many, many of the hetero parents we have seen make the news.


Would you rather a child live in the foster system for half their lives.... or be cared for and loved by a couple who happen to be two women ?


.

 

Beside the point.

Yes it does, because loving and responsible parents do everything in their power to ensure the child will have everything it needs until adulthood, including a mother and a father.

 

Ok, so I will mark you down supporting the idea that it is better for a child to live his life in foster homes or abusive situations.... than in the care of loving gay parents.

 

Then I will mark you down as one who is sanguine about misrepresenting the positions of others.

 

You've contradicted yourself. If you believe something without proof, by definition you are assuming. And you know what they say about assumption...

Another contradiction. Apparently you think you are the authority to define marriage.

 

I asked the question.... you answered.

 

The problem with humans these days is that they are apathetic, appeasers and too tolerant. The first duty of a parent is to raise/train there kids/offspring to be productive self sufficient members of society. This is far more important than being their friends or desiring their love. Most children raised this way will naturally love and respect their parents and other humans.

Women should be taught that they are responsible for picking suitable fathers and providers for their children. If women are loose and irresponsible in this, men will not be motivated to be better men. Children, as society, is reliant upon the balance that men and women bring to a healthy adjusted human. Tolerating individuals that Re lazy and act as animals only degrades society as a whole.

 

Not in the least.

Only if proof is defined as exclusive of common sense.

That word doesn't mean what you think it means.

No doubt that is very "apparent" indeed, within the realm of your fevered imagination.

Actually the record plainly shows I ignored the question, and that you presumed to fabricate an answer on my behalf.

 

I suppose it hasn't dawned on you that a God who advocates death for a child who curses his parent doesn't give two hoots about same-sex parental effect on the child.

 

I'm sure I'd have thought the same, had this been an issue during my teen years; but I've wised up a little since then.

 

Then you were a wiser teen than you are today.

 

You have a faulty definition of assume. Merriam-Webster's defines "assume" as " to think that something is true or probably true without knowing that it is true". You thought something was true. You did not know it was true. Ergo, you assumed.

I am not the authority on marriage. You are not the authority on marriage. And yet one of us is trying to decide who should and should not marry. Guess who that would be.

 

Well hell, by that definition I'm even more obviously correct, because I said to begin with that I know. Because I do.

No, you think I merely thought it's true, and that I didn't know it's true.

Your premise being false, it behooves you to reassess your position.

Well it sure as Hell isn't me, so enjoy your delusion of Godhood.