So the "science" is "in" she tells us.. have a read of this and then tell me the "science is in" It is a report on the lies and BS from the science community I would like to cut a few key quotes from it to discuss but its better to read the whole thing then discuss it. http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/reprint/c_exposed.pdf
Look At Me! Look At Me! I'm Uneducated But The Blogs I Read Make Me Understand Science Better Than Actual Scientists! Look At Me! Look At Me!
hahhaha blogs. hahahhaha look at who did the report numbbuts...the USA SENATE! hahahha yeah they are a right wing blog. you fool You are a perfect case in point mate...look at the report into all of it. Look at the part that shows proof that the ipcc engaged in conduct that PREVENTED the truth getting out.Look at the part where they discussed how to discredit ANYONE that disagreed with them. You my friend are nothing but a sheep...
come on alarmists ...debate the stuff in the link...or is climate gate just a right wing beat up....lol
Considering the biggest thing that the right wing attacked in the so called Climategate was the use of the word trick, yes.
what a joke, the emails PROVE that ipcc changed data, lied to the public and were involved in some rather dodgy stuff reguarding the stopping of anything that was contra to their falsafied findings...lol but yeah its all a right wing beat up... So much so that a USA senate inquiry found that the epa in the USA should stop using the ipcc's work.. you goose
The US government routiney denies science. In any presedential election it seems half the candidates will openly state that they support ID and deny evolution, but in your mind that's probably a good stance to take.
Tank you picked the appropriate avatar for yourself cause your about as thick as one. Time for a good film.
Funny that the alarmists will quite happily argue anything except the climate gate scandal aye... Funny that when it has been shown that the IPCC falsified data and lied about global warming the alarmist fools just ignore it like it never happened.AGW is a political agenda and that is the end of it.
another link to climategate email story.. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/j...n-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/
Ive just completed Mikes Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keiths to hide the decline. Trick in science you science denying luddite means METHOD. Trick is a common term in science when discussing the method used. Ffs, this is like when your camp says that they won't believe something because it's just a theory and they're waiting for it be proven and become a fact or a law. It shows a gross misunderstanding of basic scientific terms.
Try to escape it all you like bud, truth is that ipcc "scientists lied about global warming ... They falsified data and got caught out...and these are the very same people the goverment would have us believe ... ipcc is full of crap.
They were actually cleared of wrong doing after an investigation by actual scientists. Who gives a (*)(*)(*)(*) what a bunch of retarded politicians think?
Caesar investigating Caesar...lol man you are just that thick aint you... Everyone that investigates the goings on at ipcc ( everyone that is independent of ipcc that is) condemns them for what they did but you would have us believe that is just a right wing conspiracy aye... you poor dumb sheep....
Well you see when uneducated people such as yourself investigate science you end up with problems where you think the word 'trick' only has 1 meaning and that means to deceive. If I was to say, "Hey, can you show me your TRICK in throwing a curveball," would that mean I was asking you to deceive me?
What lie did they tell about global warming? What data did they falsify? Please answer these questions. You have made some silly claims there. Please answer the questions, or aplogise for telling lies. and BTW - what actually IS an IPCC scientist? You don't actually know what the IPCC is, do you.
What does the IPCC have to do with the right-wing beat up called "climategate"? Who has investigated "the goings on at ipcc" and condemned them for what they did? Could you show us? Or are you just telling lies again? Do you understand anything about this subject at all?
Hey look, the Christian Science Monitor told him it was a beat up and that's good enough for me! It's painful watching the antiscience right wing debate things. The Climate Deniers use the exact same arguments as the Evolution Deniers and the Big Bang Deniers. They're all the (*)(*)(*)(*)ing same!
http://www.politicalforum.com/scien...ific-theories-do-you-support.html#post4222289 Go in there and vote for which scientific theories you support.