Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Why does the AUST gov believe in BS?

Discussion in 'Australia, NZ, Pacific' started by efjay, Jul 22, 2011.

Page 2 of 2
  1. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So the AUST gov has told us the SCIENCE IS IN...and yet this report shows us that the IPCC scientists FAKED and FALSIFIED the science...
    point still stands ...the goverment believes in BS
     
    efjay, Jul 22, 2011
    #26
  2. Panzerkampfwagen

    Panzerkampfwagen New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    11,570
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No it doesn't, as I've already..... what's the point, you lack a brain.
     
    Panzerkampfwagen, Jul 22, 2011
    #27
  3. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48

    yes it does and you lack the courage to read and the brain to understand things that expose the lies you believe.

    Typical alarmist.....if you dont read it it dont exist...
     
    efjay, Jul 22, 2011
    #28
  4. Panzerkampfwagen

    Panzerkampfwagen New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    11,570
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Tell me, what does the word trick mean in science?
     
    Panzerkampfwagen, Jul 22, 2011
    #29
  5. bugalugs

    bugalugs Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    9,289
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How many times do you have to be asked?


    What does the IPCC have to do with the right-wing beat up called "climategate"?

    Who has investigated "the goings on at ipcc" and condemned them for what they did? Could you show us?

    Don't tell lies then run away. Please answer these questions.
     
    bugalugs, Jul 22, 2011
    #30
  6. bugalugs

    bugalugs Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    9,289
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Which IPCC scientists FAKED and FALSIFIED the science?
    What science did they fake and falsify?

    Please tell us.

    Can you?

    You are full of accusations - where are the details?
     
    bugalugs, Jul 22, 2011
    #31
  7. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    If you think that all is wrong with the ipcc emails is the word trick it shows that you either have not read them or have no idea what they were talking about doing.
     
    efjay, Jul 22, 2011
    #32
  8. bugalugs

    bugalugs Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    9,289
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What are these "IPCC emails" anyway? Are you perhaps referring to the stolen CRU emails?

    Do you have any idea what you are talking about?
     
    bugalugs, Jul 22, 2011
    #33
  9. Panzerkampfwagen

    Panzerkampfwagen New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    11,570
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And yet the word trick was what 95% of the complaints against the emails was about. It was what the right got stuck on for about 6 months, the word trick.
     
    Panzerkampfwagen, Jul 22, 2011
    #34
  10. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    A quote from the USA senate review into the IPCC / CRU email fiasco
    No wonder the alarmist want to just ignore it and WONT read it...
     
    efjay, Jul 23, 2011
    #35
  11. kitsune17

    kitsune17 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where did that quote come from?

    Link?
     
    kitsune17, Jul 23, 2011
    #36
  12. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    why ask for a link to something that has already been posted in this thread? dude it proves you didnt read it...
     
    efjay, Jul 23, 2011
    #37
  13. kitsune17

    kitsune17 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know I didn't read the OP, hence why I asked for a link. :-|

    Jaysus
     
    kitsune17, Jul 23, 2011
    #38
  14. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    sorry mate, bit of a touchy subject tonight. my apologies for snapping at you mate.
     
    efjay, Jul 23, 2011
    #39
  15. kitsune17

    kitsune17 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    S'all right. I'm absolutely stuffed from working all week. 60hrs in a fortnight for me is unheard of. :spin:
     
    kitsune17, Jul 23, 2011
    #40
  16. Colonel K

    Colonel K Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    9,770
    Likes Received:
    556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's a "minority" report from that burbling cretin Inhofe. A proven liar who perpetrates his deception on US government notepaper to lend his inanity the credibility it lacks.
     
    Colonel K, Jul 23, 2011
    #41
  17. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    he was just one of the people involved in the report, and yet the infomation put forward and the emails ect are not "his" doing are they?
     
    efjay, Jul 23, 2011
    #42
  18. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So now we have "climategate 2" with over 5000 emails released.. The ones i have seen thus far are really (*)(*)(*)(*)ing too.
     
    efjay, Nov 27, 2011
    #43
  19. garry17

    garry17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    4,126
    Likes Received:
    176
    Trophy Points:
    63
    How about a link or two, would be interesting to examine.
     
    garry17, Nov 27, 2011
    #44
  20. bugalugs

    bugalugs Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    9,289
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah. Right...
    [​IMG]
     
    bugalugs, Nov 27, 2011
    #45
    Ziggy Stardust and (deleted member) like this.
  21. m2catter

    m2catter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    3,084
    Likes Received:
    654
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The big questions for me, about any topics, are:
    Are we talking information or knowledge/ Do we receive information or knowledge/ Whom does this all serve/ Who has given the thumb up to do this and that research work/ who might have an advantage if the scientific work is done in one way, but not another/ and so on and so on.
    At the end you have to believe what seems most right to you, I rather speak to people from foreign countries, who reflect on their expirienes......
    At the end every report, whether scientific or else, has a certain degree of politics in it, I wouldn't be surprised to read one day, that scientist have established, that (*)(*)(*)(*) smells nice(especially when conducted in the US).
    It's like with the PISA study, the worlds standard comparison between the school kids. Yet we are so advanced, however most of our children have severe difficulties in math and literature. Speaks for itself, doesn't it?
    All politics, nothing more, nothing less...
     
    m2catter, Nov 27, 2011
    #46
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page