They look "Sexy" because they make your hips wobble - which is why they also cause lower back pain........
on another thread, Max presented this glamorous gals wearing heels: mebbe those heels give them an advantage in their aims ...
Mr Truth.. I'm sorry to tell you this but with this post ^^^ you just became "that" guy.... "that" guy who crashes the dinner party, drunk with the two sluts on his arm swinging his dick around.... while everyone is still sitting at the table chatting having an after dinner drink.
its this whole idea of judging folks based on such superficial criteria. A man who works hard to stay fit but cant because of body chemistry is 'lesser' than one who just happens to be fit without trying. Its not about whether you'll date them or not, its that your basing whether you'll date them or not on if they're 'worthy' of you. Its elitism. Folks that arent attractive *to you* arent lesser beings.
hahaha - actually, just poking fun at him and that type of right wing mentality but mebbe I should take that as a compliment
did not know this type of footwear has been around for quite a while: ^ World War II Brooklyn heroine who supposedly increased soldiers morale https://comicvine.gamespot.com/torchy/4005-6646/
As the apes that we are, we have always prefered fit partners over the "bad chemistry chemistry" type. Call this superficial. elitism or call it unfair, it does not really matter because that is just the way it is. I personally do not think there is anything "elitist" about having standards. One's value as a human is- of course - not in one's physical appearence and sometimes an attractive person can be less worth (as a human) than an ugly one.
I’ll let others speak for themselves, but I am a gigantic fan of women in general ... since as long as I can remember.
Why ugly? Men are ugly and no one considers them lesser beings? Why is a women who isn't sexy or glamorous a lesser being?
Nothing wrong with standards. Basing those standards on being superior to others is another thing entirely.
well what she's wearing is not.... what I'm talking about is for strippers, hookers, and couples who like to indulge in fantasy and roleplay.... 7 inch heels https://www.fantasyfootwear.com.au/
Guys at that Army depot in Fort Hamilton, Brooklyn do engage in rather quirky ideas. You can read more about that in the famous novel Last Exit to Brooklyn: https://100vampire-novels.com/pdf-novels/last-exit-to-brooklyn-by-hubert-selby-jr-free No doubt Torchy's fashion statement inspired that particular style in footwear.
I'm ONLY referring to general looks and class, not the soul. It's delusional to think that like doesn't attract like, and vice versa. And the word 'lesser' is used to describe men who are not in the same league. As in, lesser in looks and class. There is nothing elitist about wanting someone who is 'like' you, in terms of looks etc. It's 100% natural. Meantime, there is no 'chemistry' which prevents fitness.
But some people ARE superior to others, when it comes to looks and fitness etc. It's nature, and unfortunately nature doesn't care whether you find it offensive or not. Just as the non-smoker is hardly likely to want to hook up with a smoker, so a fit person isn't going to want to hook up with a fatso. Again, nature pushes the point further and dictates that we DO respond to good looks, and that good looking people want to hook up with other good looking people, not 'ugly' people. It's a mammal thing. Can't be helped. It should probably be noted here that only those who resent having to find mates among their own (lesser) league will have a problem with it. I've known plenty of 'ugly' people who couldn't care less, because they accept that their mates will also be 'ugly'. If you have some sort of ego issue, and think you're entitled to a stunner (when you are not one yourself), you're going to run into problems.
Sounds like backtracking. You have every right to be attracted or not to whomever for whatever reason. Ive no problem with that. The language you use: 'lessers' 'superior' etc simply suggests that you have a superiority complex. I merely find that dissapointing, is all.
Earlier today, I went shopping for my weekly groceries. There is a beauty shop on the same block as my supermarket and a girl who works there took a break to smoke a ciggie. She wore a beautiful hat like this: It made her look VERY elegant, too! Old fashion as I tend to be, I'd like to see this go back in style. Ditto for the cloche such as:
That's absolute nonsense: seems to be a typically dullard's obtuse male take on things. It's a male centric view to think men don't have physical value. It's a male centric view to think that in women, external value is equal to or even more than their internal value. Just plain silliness, is what I'm saying. Your opinion is silly, adolescent and unevolved.
