I asked a different question. and you 'truthers' are in NO position to judge any part of the 9/11 report, as you can't even all make up your minds about what happened
You asked what the unsubstantiad speculation was.. That is the same thing as a fairy tale. Have you got a REAL argument by chance? Your generalizations about the critics of your story doesn't make your story any more proven or credible. No wonder why you attempt here to shelter your report from criticizm.
A REAL argument?....from truthers? Ha. You whine about generalizations from ME, when day to day it's a new argument from your bunch.....'micro nukes'...'super-duper extra strength thermite/mate'',hologram airplanes',remote control crashes' 'directed energy weapons from space','missiles'.A3 Skywarrior into the pentagon' The list goes on....and WE have ONE story
ahh yes, when you lay your little head on your pillow at night, you can comfort yourself,by saying it's your 'duty' and 'responsibility',when actually you're defecating on the graves of 3000,because you'd rather think our government was the bad guys rather than a group who swore to kill us.... nice job,Ace
ahh yes, when you lay your little head on your pillow at night, you can comfort yourself,by saying it's your 'duty' and 'responsibility',when actually you're defecating on the graves of 3000,because you'd rather think our government was the bad guys rather than a group who swore to kill us.... nice job,Ace
So do I. Now if you have valid argument against what I say then by all means bring it. But if you can't handle my claims, so must focus on the easier to beat up straw men like hologram lazer beams or whatever, then just do that. They are not "my bunch".... This is you clinging to ad-hominem fallacies instead of addressing the point.
If anybody is "defecating on the graves of 3000", it is those who choose what is the truth, based on how it will affect their self interests. Taking the road most traveled, is pretty f****** easy.
19 Middle Eastern Men hijacked 4 planes and crashed them into 3 buildings and 1 field in Pennsylvania. That is the truth...no matter what road you traveled to get there. Let me guess, you disagree with those facts.
First ,pick an argument! And there are no 'straw men',You troofers have used each one of the at one time..... And yes, they are YOUR bunchYOU have aligned yourself with the truthers and their kaliedescope of conspiracies. Man up and own it.
Bull(*)(*)(*)(*).. I've not EVER used OR endorsed ANY claims, about "micro nukes", "remote controlled airplanes" or any of that crap you mentioned. So YES straw man.. You've been SHOWN that YOUR story is a fairy tale. "surprise attack" is just as outlandish as remote controlled airplanes and micro nukes. You need to accept that, instead of respond to me using other people's weaker arguments because you can't handle what I've said.
Birds of a, feather troofer...you may disavow the rest of your troofer bretheren, but they along with your wild conspiracies hang from your neck like the fabled tar baby.......It WAS a surprise attack, and you've had ten years to prove otherwise, without success I might add. Again, man up ,and accept that.
Very true. When you try to set yourself up as a champion of "the truth"--meaning of course in twoofer-speak the "truth" you've already decided upon--and then choose to ignore the people who blatantly disagree with you, you look like a hypocritical loon. Nothing is better than highlight twoofer hypocrisy.
No, I don't agree. If you are trying to imply that the defunct 'truth movement' was populated by 'movers and shakers', history shows you to be wrong.
The architect you need to read is the one who designed the WTC.. and look at his other buildings. You might also look at the changes made by the Ports Authority to his plans and specs.
