Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

You might have seen this Climate Change pseudoscience somewhere...

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Golem, Jul 27, 2022.

Page 2 of 20
  1. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,405
    Likes Received:
    17,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I await with confidence the judgment of history.
     
    Jack Hays, Jul 28, 2022
    #26
    drluggit likes this.
  2. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,405
    Likes Received:
    17,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sorry, but that's a misrepresentation of the facts.
     
    Jack Hays, Jul 28, 2022
    #27
    drluggit and garyd like this.
  3. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,437
    Likes Received:
    11,234
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I explained my reasons. Golem failed to address them. He only made a snide remark like yours.
     
    kriman, Jul 28, 2022
    #28
    Jack Hays likes this.
  4. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Your schtick is fake from top to bottom.

    Science isn't done here, and real scientists say you're full of it.
     
    (original)late, Jul 28, 2022
    #29
    Bowerbird likes this.
  5. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,405
    Likes Received:
    17,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I posted earlier that I would not stoop to personal attacks, and that applies here. Have a nice day.
     
    Jack Hays, Jul 28, 2022
    #30
    drluggit likes this.
  6. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The root of amateur is Ama, or love.

    Let's just say I'm not surprised at your lack of passion.

    Fits the profile, if you know what I mean.
     
    (original)late, Jul 28, 2022
    #31
    Bowerbird likes this.
  7. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,405
    Likes Received:
    17,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    As you wish.
     
    Jack Hays, Jul 28, 2022
    #32
  8. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    As I observe.
     
    (original)late, Jul 28, 2022
    #33
    Bowerbird likes this.
  9. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,025
    Likes Received:
    74,375
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    That is because you are NOT a repeat NOT using science to back your points
     
    Bowerbird, Jul 28, 2022
    #34
  10. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,025
    Likes Received:
    74,375
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    The OP demonstrated that it was so much cherry picking we could feed half the planet
     
    Bowerbird, Jul 28, 2022
    #35
  11. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,405
    Likes Received:
    17,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, no. The OP parroted the attacks by two hardcore advocacy sites. You believe them because they align with your prejudices.
     
    Jack Hays, Jul 28, 2022
    #36
    drluggit likes this.
  12. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,405
    Likes Received:
    17,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    “What man sees depends both upon what he looks at and also upon what his previous visual-conception experience has taught him to see.”
    ― Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
     
    Jack Hays, Jul 28, 2022
    #37
  13. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,405
    Likes Received:
    17,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    An example of the dishonesty in Climate Feedback "fact checks:"

    Climate Feedback Fact Checks CO2 Coalition
    Andy May
    By Andy May The Climate Feedback website critiques my CO2Coalition article “Attributing global warming to humans.” Their factcheck is here. Like most “fact checks” these days it is a thinly…
     
    Jack Hays, Jul 28, 2022
    #38
    drluggit likes this.
  14. kriman

    kriman Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2018
    Messages:
    27,437
    Likes Received:
    11,234
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I am using direct observations and commenting on them plus twenty years in the field of meteorology.

    What is your excuse? Because you understand the science? Or because someone told you that is what you should be believe?

    Kindly explain how your reason is any better than mine.
     
    kriman, Jul 28, 2022
    #39
    bringiton, Mrs. b., drluggit and 2 others like this.
  15. Doofenshmirtz

    Doofenshmirtz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Messages:
    28,169
    Likes Received:
    19,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    People claim to care about the environment, but action speaks louder than words. Are you a Vegan?
     
    Doofenshmirtz, Jul 28, 2022
    #40
    drluggit likes this.
  16. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,494
    Likes Received:
    17,052
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No to if which really agree about anything while data is often assembled in misleading ways because fame and glory lie in empowering the the biggest government power grab since Caligula drowned most of the Roman Senate.
     
    garyd, Jul 28, 2022
    #41
    drluggit likes this.
  17. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,494
    Likes Received:
    17,052
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Screaming science is not science it is screaming. Neither you nor golem have debunked anything in either this or the other thread.
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2022
    garyd, Jul 28, 2022
    #42
    Jack Hays likes this.
  18. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    43,330
    Likes Received:
    19,137
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No! I quote the AUTHORS of the studies. I quote the webpages that show the altered graphs!

    Your nonsense knows no limits!
     
    Golem, Jul 28, 2022
    #43
  19. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    43,330
    Likes Received:
    19,137
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I can't believe it! I have shown you that those are altered fabricated graphs which the authors of the studies THEMSELVES have rejected, and you still call them "peer reviewed research"?

    We are now entering the Twilight Zone...
     
    Golem, Jul 28, 2022
    #44
  20. Darthcervantes

    Darthcervantes Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2018
    Messages:
    17,604
    Likes Received:
    17,706
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm happy to actually do something about it when you guys want to start taking it seriously and not just use it for a political weapon.
    Maybe you can start a self sustaining green community.
    I'd join!
     
    Darthcervantes, Jul 28, 2022
    #45
  21. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,405
    Likes Received:
    17,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sure you do.
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2022
    Jack Hays, Jul 28, 2022
    #46
  22. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,405
    Likes Received:
    17,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You have never referenced or discussed any of the myriad posts including peer-reviewed research. You avoid them as the fly avoids the swatter.
     
    Jack Hays, Jul 28, 2022
    #47
    drluggit likes this.
  23. Jack Hays

    Jack Hays Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2020
    Messages:
    28,405
    Likes Received:
    17,981
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, no. What you have shown was the whining posted on an advocacy site about legitimate editorial decisions.
     
    Jack Hays, Jul 28, 2022
    #48
    bringiton likes this.
  24. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    43,330
    Likes Received:
    19,137
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Peer reviewed research is a consensus for AGW. There is nothing more to be said about that. It was established over 20 years ago. Your attempts to re-open it by pushing pseudoscience are of no interest whatsoever to me.
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2022
    Golem, Jul 28, 2022
    #49
    Bowerbird likes this.
  25. Golem

    Golem Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2016
    Messages:
    43,330
    Likes Received:
    19,137
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Editorial decisions (legitimate or not) are not science. In the case of the blog where you get your pseudoscience, the editorial decisions they made are helping to make worse a problem that includes loss of human life.

    It's up to if you consider that "legitimate". I don't.
     
    Golem, Jul 28, 2022
    #50
    Bowerbird likes this.
Page 2 of 20

Share This Page