Your Rocket.

Discussion in 'Other Off-Topic Chat' started by Jack Napier, Dec 22, 2011.

  1. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okay, let's ponder this (at times, I need a break from the heavy duty political chat!).

    The World is about to end.

    However, there are not one but two strokes of fortune for you.

    The first is that a planet that can sustain human life was found, before the Earth came to the point of total destruction.

    And the other is that you have personally be chosen to head up a small and well thought out team who would, on the final days, leave this earth, in your own rocket/ship, and travel to take residency of the planet.

    Your mission is not merely about personal survival.

    It is about repopulating the human race, on a new planet.

    That is why you have been given this great honour.

    There is only one problem.

    While scientists were able to build one craft able to reach the planet, in an incredibly short time, and while they were able to send unmanned probes up there prior, with all the base elements you would need to feed yourself, create homes, etc, the craft only populates 13 people.

    That is it.

    Unlucky for some...:)

    So, aside from you, that is 12.

    Who do you take?

    Now, there are at least two things to consider here.

    There is the emotional pull.

    You take your closest friends and family, yes?

    But unless they are perhaps experts in very specific fields, you may find that by taking them, you are just condemning them to death anyway, since they would be out of their depth, perhaps? Even the whole project could be killed, if you choose to risk taking those you 'love'.

    Furthermore, there is the small matter of repopulation, among those that are direct blood relatives, not surely the best basis to seed a planet?!

    Maybe you would be more logical, and put emotion aside.

    Maybe you would pick 12 people, six men and women, from different fields, none of whome were related, and all of whom were experts in a field that could turn the repopulation of the human race into reality.

    If you decide to go with that, which 12 fields do you think would give you the best possible infrastructure?

    Or do you belive that in the end, you would collapse, and end up going with the almost fated to doom optoion, of taking family and loved one's?

    Over to you...
     
    DA60 and (deleted member) like this.
  2. jmpet

    jmpet New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It wouldn't be my decision in such a case- the government- or whoever built the rocket (rocket? What is this- the 1950's?) would have the say.

    But my two cents are more women than men naturally... 5 men and 8 women. Naturally we would need professors and scientists and doctors and survivalists and farmers to repopulate a planet.
     
  3. Makedde

    Makedde New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    66,166
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You would have to take young people, especially women of childbearing age in order to start repopulating right away. People in their mid 20's. I would leave my family behind unless they could contribute - if they were doctors, police, then I would take them.

    More women than men are needed, you could probably take 10 women and two men. If every woman had a baby each year, in five years you'd have another fifty people.

    But 'jmpet' is right, the government would decide - and they'd take the people who would be utterly useless.
     
  4. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Forget the Gov, let's assume that by some quirk, it is down to you!:)

    Do you really believe, when it came down to it, you could leave your family behind?

    From your math, how long would it take to populate this planet to what Earth is today?

    And how does that compare to the time it has taken Earth to populate to the level that it is today?

    Not that I see what use a police officer would be in this situation, that said!
     
  5. jmpet

    jmpet New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It would take a human lifetime to leave behind a village of people.
     
  6. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What do you mean?
     
  7. jmpet

    jmpet New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It would take 40-60 years to die with a population of 40-50.
     
  8. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So what though?
     
  9. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Right, to be honest, I think if I could not take at least two key people, I would not wish to live on, or repopulate anywhere.

    So, my daughter and g/daughter would have to come with.

    That means I have nine spaces left.

    Right, what I need is someone who has large brains, in the fields of science and maths, and so on.

    So I may invite Stephen Hawking along, he could be very useful.

    Two doctors would useful, and one of them that could do a bit of surgery.

    That's six spaces filled, with six to go.
     
  10. DA60

    DA60 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Messages:
    5,238
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I'd blow up the rocket with no one on board.

    Maybe you all think the human race is so special that it should be maintained no matter what.

    I do not.


    Interesting thread BTW.
     
  11. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not sure if special would be my word.

    Unique? Yes, I think that is fair.

    We are the only species that would have any chance of doing this.

    Doesn't that make us somewhat unique?
     
  12. DA60

    DA60 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Messages:
    5,238
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I never said humans are not unique..I am sure they are.

    Hitler was unique as well.

    As far as I can tell, the human race is about as essential to the universe as a hemorrhoid is to a human.
     
  13. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okay.

    If we ceased to exist, it would not really matter to all the other species, I agree.

    But that would not lend itself to the thread!

    I probably would not take Hitler along.

    Esp these days.

    :)
     
  14. DA60

    DA60 Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Messages:
    5,238
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Okay...I understand.

    But I seriously do not think it is worthwhile trying to save the human race.


    So if I was being selfish I would just take 8 of the most gorgeous, intelligent, kind and decent women I could find (I imagine they would be beating down my door to fly away with me being that if they don't they snuff it).

    And 4 other women who are of adequate intelligence at best, physically unattractive and are in 2 happy lesbian 'marriages' to do the housework...lol.

    And make sure only I had the means to pilot the ship...don't want anyone getting delusions of grandeur.
     
  15. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0

    :)

    No religionists on my rocket.

    Don't want to be starting out this new society, with the same mistakes that likely lent itself to the end of this one.
     
  16. savage-republican

    savage-republican Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Messages:
    2,134
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    i would only take homosexuals on the flight, also they would all have to be minorities, wouldn't need any racist whites up there!
     
  17. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's your rocket, so have a blast!

    :date:
     
  18. savage-republican

    savage-republican Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Messages:
    2,134
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I am told on here they are pure and beautiful people who are free of prejudice and malice towards others.
     
  19. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, since you are taking 12 gays, you would have lots of time to find out.

    Good luck

    :mrgreen:
     
  20. Ctrl

    Ctrl Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    25,745
    Likes Received:
    1,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would send 2 warriors, an electrical engineer, a biologist, a surgeon, 2 miners, a mechanic, a writer, a programmer, 2 farmers, an architect, a builder, and a blacksmith.

    I would not be on board.
     
  21. jmpet

    jmpet New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I was answering you r post that said

    It would take hundreds of years to have say, 10,000 people.
     
  22. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh, sorry - I see.

    Yes it would.

    I suppose what I was trying to do was see how long it would take to theoretically populate the new planet, to the same level as Earth is now, and would that be consistant with how long it has taken Earth to be this populated, by people?
     
  23. jmpet

    jmpet New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,807
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It would take a few thousand years- perhaps 1500 years if we had advance knowledge of technology (the spinning wheel) but by no means no less than a thousand years.
     
  24. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    1500 yrs.

    To get to the same population that we have here?

    I think more.

    I think more like 15,000.
     
  25. Ctrl

    Ctrl Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    25,745
    Likes Received:
    1,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We are starting at a level of understanding about germs, etc, which they did not have 150 years ago... much less 1500 years ago... much less 15,000.
     

Share This Page