Zero Evidence that 9/11 Was an Inside Job

Why was the head of the 9/11 Commission a "jew"?

 

Silly "jewish" girls, you so funny. Why does a person have to be an expert on anything to notice that all those who occupied major gatekeeping positions on 9/11 were "jews"? If the guy who wrote the article didn't document that pretty thoroughly - and he's far from the first - tell us where he's wrong.

And I don't want to hear that typical "jewish" "strategy" of innuendo.

 

I notice all the "jews" veered away from addressing my article.

 

Yeah, Woogs could have been on the 9/11 Commission. He's good at pooh poohing evidence. (And, girlfriends, testimony is evidence.)

 

Why did the other buildings come down as easily as if it was a demolition but Bldg 7 had to be forcibly brought down?

 

"But there is no evidence of direct government involvement in the attacks."

You mean the heads of several government agencies can be involved in something, yet there's still no government involvement? How does that work? In detail please.

 

Tell me what you don't agree with in this article: http://tinyurl.com/JewsAmericasWorstEnemies

 

I didn't realize Mel Gibson had an account here.

 

The best way to do that is to de-fund all the useless government give-away programs first. Then start looking at each government entity to see if it is worth the $$$$ we are flushing down the drain. GW/AGW research grants come to mind. PP is another. In California the useless CARB (Calif. Air Resources Board). We could do without the EPA too. So much money for absolutely nothing.

 

I can't support ending the EPA. I'm sure we could still reform it, but environmental standards are necessary and aren't really feasible via private mechanisms.

Like any philosophy, libertarianism has rational limits.

 

Except it wasn't 40 Americans.

And Israel never blamed Muslims for the attack.

And there is not a shred of evidence that Israel in any way wanted U.S. involvement in the Six Day War.

 

Agreed. There isn't any evidence of such a conspiracy. It also seems like something which is very unlikely to be true. Naturally, I don't believe in something for which there is no evidence and which appears to be very unlikely.

 

Ahhhh, there is nothing like rewriting history.

The USS Liberty was attacked because of many unfortunate events. There was not question that the attack was carried out by Israeli jets and torpedo boats. Israel never denied that attack and most certainly do not blame the Muslims. Also, they did not need our help in the 6-Day War.

Israeli began paying compensation for the incident within 48 hours.

 

Absolutely not. But if you are going to claim that it did not happen the way the government said, then you need to come up with some evidence and proof as to how you claim it DID happen.

Agreed.

It would have taken MONTHS to properly outfit two 110 story buildings for controlled demo -- not just a couple of days.

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_power_down.html

Yeah I'm pretty sure the ones that sit outside on light poles are made to be weather proof. But aside from transformers and electrical panels, there are lots of things in the building that could cause sounds like an explosion.

http://www.debunking911.com/explosions.htm

 

Weapons of mass destruction ?

ring a bell ,yes the pretext for 10years of war in Iraq was a LIE!the 2 trillion dollars whould come in handy to all for NO WMD the most expensive non-existant weapons in all History!

OBL,was assassinated ,VIDEO PLEASE !

see their method is to not produce any evidence for what they say they think we are all as guilible as you.well we are not EVIDENCE of WMD and OBL assassination Please any???????????

 

Apologetics still falls on the shoulders of the government because it is a false dichotomy to claim one must show exactly what happened to prove the government's version wrong. That burden requires guilt beyond doubt and considering what we do know and that new information is still coming out after a decade.......it's obvious we don't even have all pertinent information.

 

You are now contradicting the claim the planes alone brought the Towers down.

 

The USS Liberty was attacked because it was an intel ship and the Israelis wanted to keep their war a secret. It was a deliberate act of war by the Israelis.

 

It took Israel 13 years to accept full responsibility. Indeed, nothing like rewriting history, indeed.

 

Stop using facts and common sense. Those are illegal agents in historical revisionism.

 

All REAL CHRISTIANS and REAL AMERICAN CONSERVATIVES know the Saudi royal family are the "jews" punks. They know their petro-billions are nothing compared to the TRILLIONS the "jews" have extorted from the bulk of the world for centuries through central banks. And that the "jews" could destroy them overnight - as they did Saddam when he decided to become an independent contractor rather than take orders from the "jews" - by using their media monopoly to turn the entire West against Saudi Arabia. The "jews" chuckle at how easily they can manipulate even the most powerful nation in history - America. http://tinyurl.com/JewsAmericasWorstEnemies

 

Websites consisting of peoples names does not constitute proof of a conspiracy. Not one paper has been published by the American Society for Civil Engineers that supports your belief that the towers were brought down by a controlled deomolition. Conversely, there have been numerous papers published in ASCE journals that explicitly contradict your claims about the controlled demolition of the WTC towers. Why is it that you think a website consisting peoples names is more credible than peer reviewed scientific papers published by bonafide engineers? Why do you think your position is supported by science when their aren't any scientific papers that support your position?

 

Complete bull.

The Israelis had already effectively seized a huge amount of territory from Egypt and the Soviets were already howling over the hotline to the Johnson Admin. about it.

The U.S. was conducting naval manuevers in the Med to check any attempt by the Soviets to intervene on Egypts behalf.

How was the war a "secret".