Zimmerman Bond hearing Results Part II

She is required to share whatever she has with the defense. And vice versa. She is, however, under no obligation to state anything to the court. Do you think Z's defense is going to state anything that hurts his case? Hell no. But both sides have the same information. Or else one side will be in a heap load of trouble at trial. She will present the evidence that reflects poorly on Z and his attorney will try and refute it. Then the defense will present the evidence that looks good for Z. And the prosecution will try and refute it. Then the jury will decide.

 

Well, that is your opinion. Dershowitz has already stated his opinion on the matter and I bet he is more knowledgeable about the justice system than you are. I would include a link but educating people on this forum about this case is getting old.

 

As noted by another, you are incorrect. The charging affidavit is supposed to contain all information relative to the alleged crime, pro and con. A defense attorney out there somewhere does not have the option, or ability, to submit such an affidavit. Heck, as no arrest warrant has been issued, there isn't even a viable client yet. There is no obligation for Prosecution to share squat at that point with any defense. So, once again, you are grossly uninformed.

Corey deliberately left out important evidence in her charging affidavit.

 

All he said was Murder 2 is not supported. He refuted nothing I said at all! But nice try.

 

No. He also said that Corey had been derelict in her obligations as an officer of the Court.

 

Link?

Link?

 

Well, we will let someone actually involved in the case decide that. He is certainly entitled to his opinion.

 

what in the world does our President have to do with a bond hearing for the murdering Zimmerman? smdh

 

Did you post a link supporting your earlier erroneous assertion ? You apparently do not know what a charging/probable cause affidavit is, or what is required of it.

If you want to know, there are numerous sources. But here is a good one that explains it step by step:

http://www.emptywheel.net/2012/04/14/zimmerman-anatomy-of-an-deficient-probable-cause-affidavit/

 

He said Corey's affidavit was irresponsible. Link: Google.com

 

Well thats funny coming from you, because you claim to know more about this case than Angela Corey who has 26yrs experience prosecuting cases and more than the FBI itself. You seem to think you have this whole case figured out and you don't know anymore than anyone else on this board about the case, you are doing what everyone else is doing; giving your opinion about what you think you know.

 

So........ you think Angela has more experience than all the FBI? Seriously?

 

LOL! Come on SBB you know I am right. Just admit it.

 

Has the FBI brought charges?

 

Do wonders ever cease.

 

You don't know if you are right, how would I.

 

No, they just helped in the investigation.

 

Angela Corey is a disgrace to the legal world and everyone knows it. The Judge now for sure knows it, its time to face reality already.

 

This is for all the investigators who have figured this case out and claim that Zimmerman is a victim and innocent man. Bare with me for a minute and answer a few questions.

1. We know Zimmerman and Trayvon were face to face when Trayvon asked Zimmerman, "Why are you following me?", Zimmerman's reply, "What are you doing around here?" Now that sounds like a hostile confrontation or at the least a unfriendly confrontation. Now Zimmerman claims this kid sucker punched him. Now in a situation like this both Zimmerman and Trayvon's adrenaline would be running high, so one punch from Trayvon would drop Zimmerman like a hot rock. One punch from a kid that he outweighs by about 40lbs.

2. Zimmerman claims that Trayvon beat his head against the concrete, pinned him to the ground and covered his mouth and nose.

Now if any of you have ever been in a scuffle we know you would have something that would show that you have been in a scuffle right.

a. Trayvon had one scratch, one scratch mind you on his ring finger and a small scratch at that. Now he has punched this guy hard enough in the nose to fracture his nose, yet he has no abrasion on his knuckles and his knuckles are not swollen.

b. What was Zimmerman doing when he was being punched in the nose, had beaten against the ground, being pinned to the ground, having his mouth and nose covered which would interfer in him being able to breath. He had no defensive wounds whatsoever. He didn't try to punch, he didn't scratch, he didn't grab Trayvon's arms to remove them from his mouth and nose, he didn't even bite his hand or fingers, his clothes were not ripped, Trayvon's clothes were not ripped.

Anyone who has ever been in a fight or scuffle knows this is basically impossible.

Look at the OJ case even Ron Goldman had defensive wounds on his knuckles as he was being stabbed to death, but here is a guy claiming to have been almost murdered by a kid with his bare hands and there is nothing to show a real scuffle other than a bloody nose and two scratches in the back of Zimmerman's head.

To any logical thinking person or a person who has been in a scuffle or two this doesn't make sense.

The EMT claims Zimmerman was bleeding like a stuck pig, yet he is not transported to the hospital for his injuries and doesn't receive treatment for these traumatic injuries until the next day from his family doctor. Doesn't make sense.

Now lets say that Serino would have been successful in having Zimmerman arrested that night and he would have died over night from his injuries the SPD would have had a lawsuit like no other and his family would have been crying as to why he wasn't taken to the hospital for his injuries.

Any rational thinking person knows this bull(*)(*)(*)(*) just doesn't add up.

 

Yea to the racist who thinks she should allow Zimmerman to go home for killing a black kid.

I guess that is why he has already granted Zimmerman bond.

 

AND, Trayvon had ample time to get home but came back for more. Thats the bare bone here. He could have ran back and have been safe from the oversized apparant honky, but he didn't. He got killed by his own doing. Deal with it already.

 

We haven't seen one shred of evidence of that. Other than claiming Dee said he was near home which is not at home.

So he didn't have a right to stand his ground, why did he have to go home, he could have sat down on the sidewalk or on the street and would have been well within his rights. He got killed by a wanna be coward. I am dealing with it, thats why I'm talking to your du.............nevermind. Sorry I knew you couldn't answer any of my question, that would have meant you would have had to think.

 

What part of it was raining do you not understand fully? He wasnt even supposed to be there but by the grace of his suspension. Just because you are a GUEST in a neighborhood does not mean you get to act like you own it and look into homes and do whatever the F you want, unless you are a disrespectful little jerk. He saw the white killer, profiled him, told Dee his race, and then went back for more, all your what ifs and whys are stupid. You dont get to smack someone up because they notice you are out of place- people like that end up in prison or dead no matter what color, get real.

 

I thought an American citizen was free to be anywhere in the United States of America.

Please tell me how you are breaking the law if you are standing by the road looking at someone's house, is looking at a house against the law in America? I mean was Trayvon walking up to houses pressing his face against the window pane.

The only person who is stupid and doesn't have the intelligence to answer a straight up question is yourself.

Please explain how he was out of place.

 

First you are quoting Dee's version of what she heard over a phone. She saw nothing. Second, Someone's weight doesn't have alot to do with their ability to take a punch. Get real SBB.

Correct. The injuries show it.

Not in this case. As dark as it was and GZ being stunned by the sucker punch he probably didn't have the opportunity to punch back. Glad you said "basically impossible" to show you are not completely ignorant to facts. What you are saying may be improbable but not impossible. That means GZ's account is possible.

You comparing apples to oranges.

Wrong. GZ was treated and cleaned up on the scene.

Why do you need to bring up what if scenarios to prove a point...oh yeah, because you don't have one.