Z's First Court Appearance: He Lied Under Oath

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by SkyStryker, Apr 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JohnnyMo

    JohnnyMo Moderator Staff Member Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2011
    Messages:
    14,715
    Likes Received:
    262
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Same question without including the word armed:

    Are you really claiming that 17 y/o Martin, who was being followed in the dark by the plain clothed adult George Zimmerman, had no reason to feel fear for his safety?? I sure hope not.
     
  2. James Cessna

    James Cessna New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    13,369
    Likes Received:
    572
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are mistaken, Stryker.

    GZ was on his way back to his SUV to wait for the police to arrive when TM attacked him, knocked him to the ground and clearly pounded the back of GZs head on the concrete sidewalk.

    TM started something he could not finish. May he forever rest in peace.

    Case closed. Case dismissed.
     
  3. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Lol!!! Pocket Aces said:

    "I still don't understand why Martin should have run away"

    You responded with:

    "No one said that" in post 717. Now accuse me of lying again. Lol!! Priceless example.....absolutely priceless.
     
  4. Windigo

    Windigo Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    15,026
    Likes Received:
    1,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are again trying to wrongly apply the felonious murder rule. Again you are as clueless on law as you are on medicine. Zimmerman wasn't following Martin with criminal intent. He was observing Martin because the dispatcher told him to. Twice!

    And even then you are still wrong! When Zimmerman broke off and Martin(may have or at least should have) gotten back to his house its over. Martin cant confront him.

    I've used this example before. Two guys at a bar. Tom and Joe. Tom feints a punch at Joe. That is assault. I Joe decks Tom and a fight breaks out and Tom accidentally kills Joe felonious murder rule applies.

    If no fight breaks and because Joe realizes its only a feint but minutes later Joe confronts Tom, a fight breaks out and Tom accidentally kills Joe felonious murder rule does no longer apply. Tom's assault on Joe was a prior incident.
     
  5. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why would Z go to his vehicle when he NEVER planned to meet the cops at his vehicle?????
     
  6. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    tell us again how there are only two ways Z got a bloody head. Then try to criticize others' posts again. it is quite funny......
     
  7. Windigo

    Windigo Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    15,026
    Likes Received:
    1,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is the whole point. Feeling you are being followed isn't enough to justify using force under stand your ground because it isn't an imminent threat.

    If it were enough the person would have been justified in killing me.
     
  8. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okay...lol.....okay....
     
  9. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you have a poll on that? link.
     
  10. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you accusing me of lying?
     
  11. texmaster

    texmaster Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Go ahead and keep lying. What pocket aces ALSO said which was the comparison

    Your sad attempt to leave out the details of the comparison is pathetic. Predictable but pathetic.
     
  12. texmaster

    texmaster Banned

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Are you kidding? Not only have you been accused but your lies and racism have been well documented.
     
  13. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You SPECIFICALLY quoted him as saying:

    "I still don't understand why Martin should have run away"

    Then you respond with:

    "NO ONE HAS SAID THAT."

    That is in post 717. But keep dancing because you are only embarrassing yourself....
     
  14. SkyStryker

    SkyStryker Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,388
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ROTFL!!!! Well if you say so.....HAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!!!!!
     
  15. Shangrila

    Shangrila staff Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    29,114
    Likes Received:
    674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Thread is over the 500 post limit.

    Thanks
    Shangrila
    Site Moderator
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page