oh come on. it looks like water so drink it and its hydrochloric acid. so much for the rational man theory
I think iron spheres were found proving thermic activitity and anything contrary has yet to be proven.
Iron spheres cannot be formed without thermic activity... but they don't necessarily have to been created during thermitic activity. You make yourself look so stupid when you mince your words like that lol Answer the questions Do you think Ron Wieck and dprjones make a valid point? Do you think Harrit et al made a good choice when they submitted their ground-breaking paper to an obscure open journal?
Oh I am making someone look stupid alright and its not me LOL where they submitted their papers has nothing to do with whether or not the material was some form of thermitic material. and btw, Since you have no better word that is the word I will use. If you wish to write to websters and complain be my guest.
Answer the questions Do you think Ron Wieck and dprjones make a valid point? Do you think Harrit et al made a good choice when they submitted their ground-breaking paper to an obscure open journal?
Have; Now answer the questions. Do you think Ron Wieck and dprjones make a valid point? Do you think Harrit et al made a good choice when they submitted their ground-breaking paper to an obscure open journal?
is when he starts posting gifs. Koko never answered a single question Koko still hasn't read the Bentham paper he so religiously defends. A true sheep. I answered every one of his questions. He asked for paint trace, I provided, he ignores, posts gif. Sad. Sorry, but you are nothing but a coward koko, and you know you are wrong. Everyone can see it. But it doesn't matter, the Bentham paper is garbage, and I have proven that in the last few pages, and anyone reading this thread will agree. The 5 videos on page 1 of this thread dismantle the thermite argument enough without my input. Just look at the paper, we're talking about the best scientific evidence ever to prove a conspiracy, and where does it go? An obscure internet pay-to-print "journal", and goes no further. No respectable journals, no mainstream engineers, scientists, nothing. Instead, it hides away in the bowels of the internet. It's authors hide away further, refusing to release the test they did which would actually prove what the material is, or is not. I wonder why they hide that information away?... To top that off, the authors refuse to give their chips out for independent testing. They ad hominem anyone who attempts to recreate the tests, and make excuses for their papers serious flaws. Sad. And you truthers follow these con men? You call us sheep? My god. But that will do for me. I've proven all I need to that the Bentham paper is nonsense, and there is no science backing up the thermite claim. I'll leave you all with a link to the Millette study, which confirms the red/gray chips are nothing but primer paint on steel. That is all. Truthers are stupid, and that's the truth. http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=231314 Anything anyone needs to know about thermite can be found in that thread. All done.
yep you have proven that you have nothing what so ever to defend your OP. Not even a dsc trace of paint that can be used for a reference. conjecture is not proof. Yes you have proven your position to be a PLONK
Well, looky there, koko FINALLY got something right. He also damned 99.9% of his own posts in the process. Again, well played sir. For your next trick, will you attempt to divide by zero?
as usual that is the twisted kinds of crap I have come to know you by. Once again for the billionth time, I am not the one who has to provide the proof here, you people want to represent the governments position then you provide the proof. this therad was another FAIL
You do have to present proof that a substance that is made of exactly the same things as paint, and which contains stuff that thermite is not supposed to contain, is thermite rather than paint. The only thing that can come close to proving that it is not paint would be to prove that there was free metalic aluminum in the chips.
no I do not. I am not the one who has a problem with the materials being mixed. dj is jumping up and down on his soap box claiming all sorts of fraud and when I try to get to the bottom of it by demanding a dsc trace of a reasonably similar paint giving him the opportunity to substantiate his position I get a an empty post from him. He is jumping to all sorts of conclusions with no basis what so ever to support them.
Any rational person would expect a substance containing all the igredients of the kind of paint that is supposed to be there to be that paint. All of the chips examined by Harrit and Jones contained the exact materials that were supposed to be in the paint used in the towers. It is up to them and their sheeple to prove that it is not paint. Some chips pf the paint are known to contain iron spheres that have nothing to do with the fires. You cannot get all of the iron dust off of a piece of steel at the foundry without deguassing it. Thus, some of them get painted over. Had the buffoons burned a chip in an inert atmosphere, they would have half a point. As it is, they have a boat load of FAIL.
Yet again, you failed to refute my post. Protip: I (and many others) have actually read your posts. Conjecture is the only thing you ever have.
I most certainly did refute it,. the burden of proof is on you, not me. it goes back to the initial question; prove that two planes took out wtc1 wtc2 wtc7 and destroyed wtc3,4,5,6 in the process. try to keep your eye in the ball here.
Rachel Maddow is 100 percent right on 911 conspiracy theorists - all 911 truth claims are insane, based on extreme ignorance. This includes no plane claims, the dumbest claims. Only a few insane nuts believe there were no planes. Education can cure 911 truth insanity; except the willfully ignorant who avoid knowledge and rational thought. It is ironic veterans of 911 truth (other nuts in ignorance) refute "no-plane" claims. Nuts calling nuts, nuts. 911 truth, failure that keeps failing, and doing it better each time.
No. You keep trying to prove there were no planes based on your sh!tty gifs, because the anus is on you.
thats what people are saying about the governments conspiracy theory that 19 unsophisticated sand tunnel rats infiltrated and outsmarted the most sophisticated defense, military and air traffic control networks on the planet and when you ask for the facts troughers duck and dodge with an arsenol of opinions pejoratives and put downs. yeh those conspiracy theorists can really be out there.
