Idiot boy Harrit knew that we thought his chips were paint. Why didn't that dimwit provide the data for compasion? Nothing he did proves that it was not paint.
Because it has nothing to do with the science involved. It is a disruption of rational debate. It makes the person flinging the accusation look like either an idiot of a disinformation agent. The fact that there is more proof that the towers were demolished by carefully-placed charges of unicorn poo than there is that any of us are shills for any nefarious group. There is clear evidence that many of the 9/11T crowd are Nazis and anarcho-nihilists and garden variety dimbulbs or out-and-out schizos like Rosalie Grabel and Judy Woo-woo.
You wonder why folks get annoyed when they are trying to have a discussion that keeps getting interrupted with meaningless unsupported illogical blather? I would have thought you'd have been able to figure out why by now. Maybe you're relying too much on your imagination. It keeps sending you off into fantasy land.
Conversation getting interrupted? That's pretty funny. If I had one thing I could point to, I'd say that interrupting any particular point by certain individuals here is what this place is all about. Way back when, I couldn't get a decent respectful conversation going without these "interruptions" you refer to. Seems to me "interruption" by ridicule, or other tactics is what certain folks are (forgive me) "assigned" to do. Seems to me reasoned debate is the last thing certain folks here want. "Interrupted"? That's a laugh.
Let me put it this way. Shrieking about my being a "shill" has nothing to do with the fact that the chips contain everything that should be in paint, that they contain stuff that is NEVER supposed to be in thermite, and that idiot boy Harrit did not demonstrate that they could NOT be paint. Until that doofus shows us that his chips burn in a vacuum, your insistance that I am a shill just looks like more chimpanzee shrieks.
Being asked to support your claims with evidence is not interrupting. Shrieking like a small child and calling everyone who disagrees with you a 'shill' certainly is.
I thought all your woes were solved when you joined the Let's Roll forum? Since they scratched your itch, why do you still come here to bellyache?
Oh please boss. We've been down this road once or twice. One big difference between shills and me. Shills have a default setting of "everything I'm told is unshakably true, and I question nothing". My default setting is "believe nothing the goobment puts out and question everything they say". Cite this....right here....boss.
Wrong fraud,your default setting is 'muddy the waters with BS claims,and whine about shills when confronted'
Maybe it is time to close the thread because, as predicted, the tin foilers have no rational counter argument and have just sunk to ad homs that would make a third-grader blush.
Wrong again, Fraud. I question everything everyone says. My default setting is 'show me the evidence'. Yours is 'Shill! Shill! Shill!' Everything is a conspiracy with you. Hell, you even accused Romney of steering a frickin' hurricane into New Jersey in order to win the election! I'm curious: why did Obama steer the tornados into Moore? Was it to divert attention from his political troubles? You keep calling me boss. You certainly know who your superiors are, boy. Now run and whine to the mods that you were 'attacked'.
Only because you keep hijacking threads to discuss shills. If there's some sort of difference that you can measure through the internet, then why do the folks at Let's Roll think you are a shill?
Complete horsepoop . Show me where I claimed "Romney steered the Hurricane into New Jersey". You're full of it, as usual. If your default setting was "show me the evidence", your posts would reflect that natural objectivity. They don't. They show a predetermined agenda. Have a great day boss.
You guys hijack threads to discuss propaganda. I don't see much different in the two. - - - Updated - - - Mud throwing? That's a shill function, Sir.
Perhaps you were 'hacked' again? Just like you never directly called anyone a 'shill', huh? http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...-cant-use-common-sense-46.html#post1062644502 You're caught in another lie, Fraud.
That's a good attitude. What other things do you you think are bad but you do anyway because you see others doing it too? Do you lie because you think we are lying to you? What if we're not?
Your blatant lies aside, which Hannibal has pointed out, the fact that there is a "default" setting doesn't mean that it's a permanent setting. Hannibal and I are not close friend by any means, a few conversations in PM's, a few back and forths here, however I feel confident enough to make an observation. I am going to say that Hannibal started with natural objectivity, maybe even some skepticism about the attacks. I know my own skepticism is how I got interested in 9/11, and the events that happened. Then, I feel safe in assuming, Hannibal went out and did research. He read reports, studies, found information online. Looked through all of the available information and then formed an opinion or theory based on the available evidence. So while it may not be objective now, insinuating it never was is ridiculous.
I didn't say Romney created or steered the storm. Wrong yet again, boss. HAARP, weather manipulation exist too. It's been the military's objective since the sixties. What YOU got YOURSELF caught up in here boss, was your own limited comprehension of the words you read and that you would like them to say for purposes of propaganda. Never directly called anybody a shill either boss, but hey, if the shoe fits????
Nah...don't buy your assessment there friend. The boss has been doing this very same thing for at least 8 years now, and at no time, has he EVER shown objectivity. ANYTHING and EVERYTHING presented to him that differs from the "official" BS story, he rejects without discussion. The the other "fellas" come rolling in and start the ridicule, mud it up, show. Been that way for as long as I've first tried to discuss this rationally. Hasn't changed one iota. The tactics haven't changed. The players haven't changed. The group attack strategy hasn't changed. It's the same way it has been for at least 8 years now. (*)(*)(*)(*) off the boss, and you get banned so, you have to step carefully with the powerful one. Nice try friend. Way short of the mark though.
