As whites become a minority in the next 30 years, the Republican Party will

That didn't save the 6 million.

 

got any evidence, or is this just more racist bull(*)(*)(*)(*)?

 

Are statistics racist?

Why has Mexican-American assimilation stagnated?

"...But then the assimilation process stalls out. Unlike the descendants of European immigrants to the US, the researchers conclude to their own admitted surprise, Mexican Americans have not fully integrated by the third and fourth generation — particularly in terms of education, earnings, ethnic identity, and residential segregation"

 

I reported this racist flame bait thread and hope the mods have the good sense to delete it. I ask that anyone reading this thread do the same. Is this the proper ways to begin threads now on the forum?

 

I read about this in the mainstream media a few years ago. But here is a study I just found:

http://www.workforce.com/articles/mexican-americans-aren-t-moving-up-study-finds

 

The study found that the median annual income for men born in Mexico who are working in Chicago is $28,000. For their U.S.-born counterparts, the median leaps to $47,000.

Roughly half of the Mexican immigrants working in the six-county region have jobs in the food service, construction and manufacturing industries. Forty percent of U.S.-born workers of Mexican descent hold similar jobs, trapped by a "blue-collar ceiling," according to a study released Thursday by the New Journalism on Latino Children project.

U.S.-born Mexican women fare better in the workplace, with more of them in administrative jobs, the study showed. John Koval, a retired DePaul University sociology professor who led the research, said Mexican-American women tend to advance further in school. "They don't have the same dropout rates (as men), which gives them an edge to look for jobs," Koval said.

http://www.workforce.com/articles/mexican-americans-aren-t-moving-up-study-finds

looks like you very biasly cherry-picked your own link, bro.

 

Cause they are taking white manufacturing jobs, which doesn't take a genius to do.

You didn't explain this:

?

This corroborates my statement.

I think you did the same...

What do you think about Lil' Mikes info? Will you explain that?

 

native-born Mexicans do better than their immigrant parents.

this is a fact.

the stats show it.

 

What a racist thread.

 

Why is this thread not been deleted? Is this now the racist forum?

 

You gotta start somewhere. If you come from a poorer country, you're going to be at a disadvantage at first.

We do feel it somewhat, particularly in the rising costs associated with language difficulties in schools.

However, a lot of people come here from Latin America because we depend on cheap labor in agriculture, and companies like Tyson and Perdue recruit people there.

Why would I be in support of only allowing white people in? I prefer policy to be set according to our economic needs. That being said, I do think we let in too many poor people too.

The difference, however, is that I don't care where people come from in terms of skills, wealth, and education. If someone is highly skilled, wealthy, and/or highly educated, I want them to come here regardless of their country of origin.

That depends on how you define "white."

Most Portuguese view themselves as white, whereas we would categorize them differently here. The same goes for Brazilians.

As far as I understand it, a lot of South Americans view themselves as white, but their complexions have a wide range.

 

Yeah, but why aren't the latinos moving up?

Do you think that diversity and multiculturalism is good?

Why aren't you?

Why should we favor poor Mexicans over white Europeans?

This causes race problems and race mixing.

The Portuguese will be classified as white by the US census. Lots of Brazilians are white.

they are not all white.

 

they are moving up.

US-born Puerto Ricans, Dominicans, Cubans, are doing better than their immigrant parents.

- - - Updated - - -

Mexicans ARE moving up the socio-economic ladder, your own article says so.

maybe not as fast as Cubans and Puerto Ricans, but still moving up.

 

What SPECIFICALLY is racist?

 

Language barriers, cultural shortcomings, etc.

It's probably a combination of factors.

I think it's neutral. It has pros and cons. Some of the pros include worldliness, innovation, and an interesting array of food, arts, and entertainment.

Some of the cons include conflict, stratification, and alienation.

I don't generally judge people by race. I judge by culture. There are some cultures that I don't care for, but I try to evaluate people as individuals. I'd prefer we keep out fanatics from various cultures, but I'm ok with moderates from these cultures.

I can't support a whites only policy, not only because it's racist, but because some of the best friends I've made have been non-white. My very best friend is South Korean, for example.

We shouldn't. We should favor education, skill, and wealth over poverty and a lack of skill and education. However, we do have a certain amount of need for cheap labor in agriculture.

Our current immigration policy is arbitrary and actually discriminates against Western Europeans. I know this firsthand from when I used to date a Portuguese woman who I tried to get a visa for. So, I find that pretty racist in its own right.

However, I wouldn't go the other extreme either. We shouldn't favor any particular race. We should simply favor people who have the most to contribute to our society economically.

Mixing isn't a bad thing. It actually tends to reduce conflict. When people separate from each other, that's usually when problems occur.

Well, that's why I'm asking how you define white. What percentage of European ancestry does someone have to be in order to be considered white?

Most South Americans are a combination of European and native heritage. Some also have some African heritage.

 

Your racist rant of hate whitey crap in your OP. This is typical racist divisive politics of exclusion. You are full of hatred and race baiting and flamebaiting.

 

The white man is the most innovate. What do you mean by wordliness?

And non-white on white gang rapes and changing our political system.
As for food, do you know that Japan has Italian food without Italian people?

Yes.

Why not favor the best cultures to come here over the weaker ones?

Do you want all cultures to come here or are you okay with discriminating against them in favor of stronger ones? We should do this so we wont have racial problems and only accept people who assimilate, i.e. other whites. Other races are free to discriminate against us too.

They are a threat.

Diversity and multiculturalism is racist. All the other countries discriminate too.

Are you against white people surviving?

You are for diversity or you are for homogeneity. All options are racist.

Im all for that, but just within the white race. I am not even opposed to non-whites coming here to work only and help us, but only if they are not granted citizenship.

We can get that from east and southern Europe, and unlike the Mexicans these people will assimilate and have the potential to move up. They are more successful.

Yes.

Why do you think preserving races is extreme?

Homogenous countries do not suffer racial problems.

Mixing is what produces conflict. Being separate is peaceful.

Like?

At least 99 percent. Some will say 100 percent.

Many are also pure whites from all over Europe but they are predominately southern European whites.

 

tell that to Ireland.

tell that to Ukraine.

tell that to Bosnia.

these are 100% white nations, that have massive conflict.

dude, you have every right to advocate for an all-white USA, but you have already lost the debate.

the USA is multi-ethnic, multi-racial, and will stay that way.

don't like it? leave.

 

This is true, but a few things. You are misconstruing what I am arguing.

1- Ireland its religious, not racial. I dislike religion and don't want it in an all white state.
2- Ukraine, its multicultural. They didn't assimilate the Russians. Its "diversity" causing this.
3- Bosnia, same thing as Ireland.

Show me a state that is 100 percent of one ethnicity fighting over race.

Yep, but I like to convince people to be on the same page as me regardless. I advocate a white nation because its therapuetic.

Even Iceland is multicultural. There is nowhere to go. If multiculturalists agreed to give us a country, I will consider it. Or in the very least, I will respect the rules of the multicultural nation that I stay in if I don't leave.

 

Yes, but the article says 1- Mexicans are not moving up into the upper classes unlike white immigrants before them and that they are stuck in "blue collar work". That's the highest they are going.

I am not impressed they are getting middle class blue collar jobs. They are automated and not hard to do.

 

Lol.... no kiddin'

 

there are a lot less low-skilled manufacturing jobs now than there were 70 years ago.

its a lot harder to come to the USA with no skills and no education, and move up the socio-economic ladder, than it was when most white immigrants came here.

 

That would be next to impossible.

Whites, blacks, Latinos, Asians....

Unless a Latino or Asian kills or hurts someone, then suddenly they're white.

I mean... how do we keep track ?!

 

sorry racists, but the USA is multi-cultural.

this won't change.

no state, no county, no city has had a referendum on being all-white.

its just not gonna happen.

you can keep demanding it, but its not gonna happen.

if you REALLY want to live in an all-white society, you're gonna have to move to Iceland.

 

I envision the country being divided by half, or maybe 3/4ths to whites and the rest to non-whites.

What do you mean?

Anyone of full European ancestry. Take a DNA/ancestry test if you are concerned.

- - - Updated - - -

Minorities generally hate white people, and complain we oppress them and are racist, so why not just divide the country between the multiculturalists and pro-white people? This way both sides are happy.