Father and son charged with murder of Georgia jogger.

I believe the statement said 'khaki shorts'. It didn't say 'khaki colored'. So until specified, it could be either.

 

Is the color or type important?

Is it one doesn't jog in khaki's? So therefore must have committed a crime?
What do you think the crime was?

 

Your assumptions are just that. I made no statement regarding any of your questions, so you are reading more into it by your own imagination. Several others were saying khaki is only one color, but it's not. Perhaps you need to ask them why it was so important.

 

Right, except it's insane for one to try to claim he must be guilty because he was jogging in khaki type shorts. And who said he was wearing khaki material shorts?

 

I am merely wondering why anyone is concerned about the shorts?
You were commenting on shorts, so I figured you might have a reason for commenting on the type or color of shorts into the conversation.

If they are not important. OK, I agree.

 

Bottom line, the Father and Son should have followed the jogger and reported his location to police rather than play cop and
get the guy killed.

 

Wouldn't you get mad when people see your Confederate flag and automatically assume you will be a red-neck racist with
inbreeding problems? That's the assumption you are making in regards to the victim of this shooting. Just say'n.

 

It turns out there were no recent reports of burglary in the area, the only report came that day and was made by the son.

The video was taken by a third man, a family friend, who has been identified. I suspect he may end up being charged.

Their biggest problem is the initial story and subsequently police report is completely falling apart. I wonder if the police might be charged as accessories after the fact.

This is going to get real ugly for the father and son because it appears premeditated. A modern day lynching if you will.

 

Exactly. "2 white men" is the important part.

If it was "2 black men shoot a black man. No arrests 2 months", the media wouldn't care.

 

And no arrests. Until the video.
if it was 2 blk men shooting a blk man, they'd been in jail that day.

 

And nobody would care, because no white people are involved.

 

Because no arrests were made until a video.

 

And could you imagine the freak-out if two black men jumped in a pick-up, tracked a white male jogger down
the road, started shooting and then told the white guy to stop, and then shot him in a struggle?

The black guys would be on death row by now.

 

Black people murder white people all the time. The media ignores it.

If the races were reversed in this case, the media wouldn't care, and this thread wouldn't exist, because OUTRAGE Inc. wouldn't care.

 

They don't get excused for shooting white guys when it's on YouTube by the cops cause the black guys said
they thought the white guy looked suspicious, now do they. Not a question.

 

Reverse the races, and you wouldn't care.

 

What proof do you have he would't care?

 

Wrong again.

 

All the black on white murders that are conspicuous by their absence.

 

Which ones, where multiple black men hunt down an innocent white person and kill him, are you referring to? And you DO realize Daniel didn't start this thread, right? Meaning he never brought up this white on black murder.

 

Can anyone see a scenario where two black guys get in a truck, chase down a white jogger in their community, get into an
altercation and shoot the white guy, and the two black guys are not immediately charged with a crime?

Just not going to happen.

 

That’s what happens when the group you belong to represents less than 13% of the total population and yet commits >50% of the total murder.

 

And white folk who own Confederate flags are more likely to be involved in murder than those who do not. Should people
be allowed to track down and shoot people with Confederate flags?

 

Well first of all that’s not true. But second of all the point was not it’s okay to hunt down black people and shoot them for being black. The point was that whites get the benefit of the doubt when things like this happen and blacks don’t. I don’t think that’s necessarily true but even if it were their grossly disproportionate rate of violent crime would explain why.

 

May have all there been at the scene of the shooting. Could have questioned the first 911 caller too, but they probably didn't see the shooting.