GUILTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He wasn't told to do this, he was given the option to at his discretion.

What exactly does Stormy Daniels have to do with Russia again?

 

The Judge in Virginia thought the same thing as you. I guess you had both been listening to fox. When presented with the documentation outlining the scope of investigation, the judge changed his mind.

 

I saw the documentation when it first came out, have you?

Here, knock yourself out.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...nt-Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.html

 

In all honesty, I don't really care how many women Trump humps in or out of the White House. I DO CARE whether he collaborated with Russians during the campaign & after. I want no person, male or female, Democrat or Republican, to be President if they are working for or with a foreign power in a way that could potentially harm this country or it's citizens. I strongly favor having good relations with Russia, as well as every other country out there, but not at the point of risking our safety, security or individual freedoms. Trump seems to have a very low level understanding of government, our Constitution, the legal system, or even what freedoms we have that we love. He's possibly the most selfish, self-centered man I've ever seen, and I've never really liked people with that particular personality trait.

 

His testimony without physical evidence means diddly squat.

 

There is zero evidence for Russian collusion. The best you've got is the bait and switch pulled by the Russian adoption lawyer, and that came to nothing for anyone.

 

Yep; so far our leftist have failed to show any iota of proof. All they have managed to do is turn up a hand full of people who will COMPOSE as Mueller wants them to compose. The problem of course is that without that proof, it all falls apart.

 

The left is eager to proclaim Trump guilty without any evidence. This means they put their own interests above justice. That is disturbing.

 

You mean that the evil lefties are magically required to carry out the investigation and personally provide you with evidence?

Hmmm. That doesn't sound right at all.

 

Precisely. Remember how anytime Obama was criticized for anything the charge of "Racism" was raised and sometimes people were destroyed as a result? Remember when no matter what was revealed about Obama or something bad he was involved in he was never investigated because he had already politically weaponized the DOJ and FBI? Obama was PROTECTED period; and as a result our leftists HOWLED that Obama was innocent because he was never investigated.

 

It's pretty sick and disgusting how the left will do and say anything to destroy Trump, his family, his associates, and his businesses.

I think this isn't going to go well for the Democrats because people don't really care who the President had sex with years ago and the private personal payment he made to these mistresses.

All this does is piss off his supporters even more and they will definitely turn out in November to stop the dims in their tracks.

 

Practice patience. The Mueller probe isn't finished yet, and we don't know what to expect from that.

 

1) I did not say it was just like the Salem Which Trials. It is your reading comprehension that is "horsecrap"
2) The idea that Mueller is "professional" is far fetched .. they guy as found numerous people "guilty" that were not.
3) The poster was implying that this could not be a "witch hunt" because people were found guilty ... that is to what the Salem reference was used.

 

We have already seen most of what Mueller has in regard to Russian including a company named in the indictment that did not yet exist. We have DOJ statements in both Russian indictments that no American was knowingly involved with either and no allegations in either that they changed the outcome of the election. What more am I supposed to wait for?

 

It's common knowledge that Mueller doesn't leak info until he uses it in court or preparing for court. Mueller has NOT released much of what he knows. Hang in there.

 

Why refer to a completely non-analogous situation at all?

So you could whine about it when someone pointed out that it made no sense?

And who did Mueller “find guilty” who wasn’t? Isn’t that the function of the judicial system?

 

How is a witch trial - not analogous to a witch trial ? Are you intentionally disingenuous or does it come naturally ?

Mueller persecuted many who were not guilty, found guilty those who were not on the basis of nefarious tactics, and imprisoned many who were not guilty.

Since when is it the function of the Judicial system to imprison people who are innocent of a crime ?

 

Since Trump & Sessions had over 1500 innocent children & infants imprisoned in cages across the country, for an undetermined amount of time. Kidnapping is a crime, and our President shouldn't be above the law.

 

Cohen's "testimony" is deceiving. Yes, Trump "directed" Cohen to make payments, but no indication the payments were illegal. Cohen simply plead to what prosecutors alleged ... Ironic prosecutors immediately followed up by citing Cohen's "pattern" of lies and criminal behavior.

 

What does the investigation into Manafort have to do with Mueller? This trial had nothing to do with Russia. Separate issues...

 

I thought we were talking what is supposed to be and not what actually is

 

This is loaded with claims desperately in search of factual support.

Who "was innocent of a crime"? (The answer ought to be good)

 

I did not say anyone was innocent of a crime .. .you were the one that said it was the function of the Judicial system to imprison people who are innocent.

This claim is very strange ... and desperately in search of factual support or at least clarification.

That Mueller is a scum bucket is simply well known historical fact.

 

Yes they did, to bad they also didn't fix it so someone like Hillary couldn't use the most powerful offices in the land to get it so she could even run for President. She should be in jail right now. That " blowhard, conman" I believe your talking about our President, so far hasn't been convicted of any crime yet. Only those working for him and of those crimes most of them had nothing to do with Trump and happened years before working for him.

I will have to agree with you that Trump has a big mouth and is a blow hard. But in spite of his faults, he has done more for this country in a year and a half than Obama did in eight. For that matter, he has done more in so little of a time he could go down in history as one of our greatest Presidents of all time, even if he is impeached. Wouldn't that be something else?

 

1. You made the claim that "Mueller persecuted many who were not guilty, found guilty those who were not on the basis of nefarious tactics, and imprisoned many who were not guilty", so I find it puzzling WTF you were referring to. Elaborate.

2. I made no such claim. You're full of Trump. I suggest some Dulculoax.

3. Explain what you meant, and stop lying about what other posters post here.

4. You're welcome.