Kicked out of class for telling professor there are only two genders

Oh...then you are offended by my posts.

Funny, you just claimed you were not. How can you be honest with others when you aren't even honest with your own posts?

 

I'm well aware of what Biology is, and what it entails. I bolded the part for you that is most applicable here. The Human Males Physical Structure with regards to being Male is static. it does not change. never has any human started at one gender/sex and transitioned to the other. We aren't like some reptiles and amphibians thatc an do this. Our bodies simply don't allow it, regardless of how many times you click your ruby slippers together.

Born Male...you're Male. That's it. All the hormones and costumes and appeasements won't change this.

And? A Male ignoring his physical makeup and proclaiming he is really a Female is not an evolution or a development. If left alone, this Male will not be a Female when you come back to look.
It's a delusion, and until this one came along we as a society didn't validate or play along with delusions...we tried to treat them.

Of course I know they don't always conform to the norm. Birth defects and the like happen. These conditions and defects however do not comprise new subsets of the Human however, they're simply defects from the norm. All of this is just fluff trying to cloud the discussion.
A Klinefelters or Intersex person is not an example of a new subset of Human anymore than someone being born with 6 Fingers is. The normal Human possesses 4 fingers and a thumb. While some deviations or defects happen, we do not rewrite what a human is to say "Humans have anywhere from 2-8 fingers"...they don't. It's 4 and 1 thumb.

Even biology isn't perfect and defects will happen, this does not mean those defects are some new class.

The facts and science of it is that the brain, like any other body part, can have defects. We see them all the time. Some people think they're Multiple personas. Some thing they're animals, some think they're famous people.

In all of these we know from their Biology what they are and are not, and as such we know they have some form of delusion or other mental illness.

It's the exact same here.

If you disagree, then tell me why one can be Transgender, but one cannot be 2 people..or 3.. or more. Because we know it's just one person right? We can clearly test and see this.
Same here. We know that verifiable, provable Human Male is a Human Male. If his mind tells him otherwise, he belongs with those mentioned above obviously.

I can show you people with 2 heads, or 6 fingers...this does not prove anything other than defects happen in Biological life.

Defects, not evolutions into some new species.

Already debunked this above.

Actually you haven't shown anything other than your shortsightedness, and willingness to play along with delusion. And yes, you should stop using "science" , because you don't seem to know what it entails. You can't claim that validating unprovable ideas in ones head, which run contrary to the observable facts are in fact science. it's nothing of the kind. it's simple appeasement coming from the usual mindset of there is no right and wrong, everything is a shade of gray and if it feels good, go for it.

The regular stuff that drives you feelers.

 

You've gotta be trolling me. You're really trying to claim that you can't have "more" of something unless you had absolutely none of that thing before?

 

Still batting a 100%.
Why keep making crap up?

 

Stating you're not very bright on debating isn't being offended.

 

Let's just leave it at, you have your feelings on how people should be.

There is no new class, trans has been around for almost as long as beings have been reproducing.
I'd be willing to say, the % of those trans types is about the same throughout history.

 

I also stated there is likely those authoritarian professors in the past.
But yes, in order to have more, there has to be a base to have more of anything. So I don't believe there are more. But about the same.

 

Your insults are like a white flag. Keep waving.

 

There you go again basing everything around feelings.

No, lets just leave it at you don't like the static nature of human biology and think hard science like this can be interpreted to please people.

That's feelings over science, and that's not me..it's you, and you alone.

Has nothing to do with "how I think people should be", it's the realization that there are limits to what people can be, and that's just Biology setting the rules. You know, a hard science..not that soft feely based science. Some things unfortunately are already decided for you. You don't get to have a tail, you don't get 3 legs and if you're born a Male or Female....well that's what you are.

 

It isn't being honest or accurate either. You took exception to my post long ago and have back tracked ever since.

 

There is nothing static about carbon based life forms.

 

Took exception to what?

 

Nice try Mr Spock, we're talking about Humans, which whittles the field down considerably. And yes, some things are static. Gender/Sex of course being the one we are talking about here.

No Human has ever jumped genders, it's simply not in our code to do so.

If someone is telling you that we can, well they're lying to you.

 

If there is a woodpile and you're chopping wood and putting it on the existing pile, that's not "more" wood?

AND if there were already authoritarian professors, why is that not a "base" from which to have more?

AND doesn't the need for a base contradict your earlier statement that we had to have nothing before we could have "more"?

 

Go look it up. Your the one who got her bonnet flipped around over something.

 

Yes that is more wood.
Now how do we know, there are more authoritarian professors? From when, yesterday, last week, last year, last decade?
More than what?

 

I figured as much. Nuttin honey.

 

LOL

Thank you for your opinion.

No culture war, except against those perceived to be living in some imaginary distant past inhabited by their great grand parents. Intended I imagine as some type of insult, it's rather irrational to claim there is no culture war, as that is how they are waged.

You should know it's a bit difficult for society to bow down to changing requirements when they are grounded on nothing.

Perhaps it would be better if the word "gender" was eliminated from the English language, since it doesn't mean anything any more.

That might help people avoid the personal destruction that will reign down on them if they violate the new rules in this non culture war war.

 

I guess we don't know how many have been closet authoritarians all along and just biding their time until they had full control. But what we do know is that the instances of authoritarian behavior have increased since they obtained that control. The cases I cited are just two instances from within the past year. I mean, do you think that things like what happened to Bret Weinstein have been happening all along? Professors being chased out of college by leftist mobs for refusing to engage in racial segregation?

 

So, you think by removing the word 'gender', there'd be no more people who are with one set of sex organs but have a identity different than the organs?

 

You are trying so desperately to label me. And you're failing miserably. Ridiculous that you deny there is a Culture War.

My whole point, if you actually read my posts, is that this guy could have likely used the wrong reference word, when stating accurately that there are only two sexes.

The word "gender" has been redefined. Some people may not understand that. Misuse equals target on their backs and attack.

I don't have any opinion on what people want to believe themselves to be. Means ZERO to me. Live and let live.

My concern is how words, and their innocent misuse in this Culture War, can lead to attack and expulsion.

I think that is wrong.

 

What happened to Weinstein is wrong and terrible.
But I thought we are talking about authoritarian professors. And how there are more of them being authoritarian.

 

No, I am not trying to label you. Maybe that's why I'm failing.
When in this country hasn't there been a culture war?
What does that have to do with transgenders?
Yes, he may have used the wrong word. There are 2 sexes and then a mix of the 2 sexes. None of which is strictly related to gender.

I stated earlier, perhaps to you, that words get redefined all the time. Even gave the origin of the meaning from 1300 for gender.

 

There are males, females, and mistakes. Three genders.

 

Yes, that's what we're talking about. And how they're driving away the libertarian left professors like Weinstein. And that is the case here. It wasn't students who came up with the ideas that led to the Evergreen debacle; the students are just the hit squad- the useful idiots. Most of the other professors there were instigating the hate mob, and they were the ones who indoctrinated the students into their crazy ideas. With Lindsey Shepherd, it was the faculty tyrannizing a student. With Bret Weinstein, it was students tyrannizing faculty (with support of other faculty). But the commonality is that the tyranny stems from the so-called "Social Justice" ideology, which is actually nihilistic postmodernism combined with a revamped version of Marxism (but that's a big enough topic for another thread).