L.A. Times: Why is liberal California the poverty capital of America?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by slackercruster, Jan 16, 2018.

  1. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But how would that benefit the owner?
     
  2. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    which is irrelevant to the fact it's because of Obama.

    which of course didn't happen.
     
  3. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That was my point. No one is going to rent out a home and lose money doing it.
     
    Fred C Dobbs likes this.
  4. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,257
    Likes Received:
    37,983
    Trophy Points:
    113
    400k? Where I live that means you have a railroad track in your backyard and drug dealers in your front yard. Currently that'll rent for about 2500.
     
    Antiduopolist likes this.
  5. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I was being modest, as the median price for a home in SoCal is about $500k.

    The point is, only people who make a substantial amount of money would be able to afford the rent that is driven by the cost of homes in the area.

    Putting in rent control in such an area simply means there will be no homes for rent, as the owners would lose money on that prospect.

    Are you suggesting that the people in need of "rent control" can afford that $2500 a month rent right now?

    The Temecula/Murrieta area is one of the only examples I can think of where the prices aren't out of the world ridiculous in SoCal.
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2018
  6. modernpaladin

    modernpaladin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    28,095
    Likes Received:
    21,372
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Sentimentally, I agree. Practically, thats a huge step towards collectivism.

    Ideally, I would like to see a system that discourages real estate as a means of hoarding wealth, but still allows for it. Perhaps by alotting every citizen a maximum of two, tax-free 'residences' (so people can own and live in a home while having one listed for sale) and dramatically raising taxes on any additional residential properties that are either not available for rent or have not been rented for a certain period of time (to prevent raising rent prices as a means to loophole). As far as corporations go, I would like to see their status as 'persons' done away with, but until then, a corporation would be subject to the same laws- two tax free residencial properties, and high taxes on any (unrented) beyond that.

    Or something along those lines.
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2018
    Antiduopolist likes this.
  7. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,257
    Likes Received:
    37,983
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm suggesting the part of the reason prices keep rising is the high rent. Houses get snapped up by investors so they can rent them out.
     
    Antiduopolist likes this.
  8. Antiduopolist

    Antiduopolist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2016
    Messages:
    24,354
    Likes Received:
    10,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Part of the problem.
     
  9. Antiduopolist

    Antiduopolist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2016
    Messages:
    24,354
    Likes Received:
    10,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :applause::applause::applause::applause::applause::applause::applause:
     
  10. Antiduopolist

    Antiduopolist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2016
    Messages:
    24,354
    Likes Received:
    10,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's a vicious cycle; high home prices keep people renting, the lack of housing (affordable and otherwise) pushes rents up.

    It's unsustainable, and we're headed off a cliff.

    Good morning, Soylent Green.
     
  11. Antiduopolist

    Antiduopolist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2016
    Messages:
    24,354
    Likes Received:
    10,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    One bedroom apartments rent for 2000 - 2500+ in LA now.
     
  12. Fred C Dobbs

    Fred C Dobbs Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2016
    Messages:
    19,496
    Likes Received:
    9,006
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Buying a house with the idea of renting it out tends not to be a great investment. I don't know your area but look at a typical home and the rent it might get and the rate of return likely isn't that great.. They may just be speculating that the market goes up.
     
  13. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,257
    Likes Received:
    37,983
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A speculation made more affordable by constantly rising rents.
     
  14. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,613
    Likes Received:
    11,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why is liberal California the poverty capital of America?
    Just following the laws of economics...
     

Share This Page