Left Opens War On All Religious Schools By Targeting Where Karen Pence Works

Point out to me where I specifically said those words about Immanuel Christian School. Your reading comprehension skills are off a bit.

 

Your smears fool no one.

 

Thank you for proving my point!

 

Thank you for clearly establishing your rightwing credentials and completely debunking your bogus allegations about being a "hardcore lefty", a "liberal" and a "progressive socialist".

 

Complete and utter nonsense without any credible substantiation whatsoever.

 

I don't think you can say what Jesus would say about homosexuals since he never weighed in on the topic. However, while Christians are followers of Jesus, their example is Paul, who DID weigh in on homosexuals and condemned them in no uncertain terms.

Romans 1:26-27 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. (KJV)

 

Paul/Saul was called the "Man of the Lie" by James, the brother of Jesus!

In essence you just negated any pretense that fundamentalist christians follow the teachings of Jesus. It would be far more honest and accurate if they called themselves Paulinist Zealots instead.

But I do appreciate you conceding that the odious bigotry and discrimination against gays and the less fortunate has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the ACTUAL teachings of Jesus who would be APPALLED by what is being done in his name.

 

In what part of the Bible exactly?

 

I guess you consider the truth to be a smear......sad.

 

Meanwhile, James, Peter, and John, the three disciples who were closest to Jesus all during his ministry, recognized Paul as doing God's work.

Galatians 2:9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.

Even as a Christian, I considered the book of James to be heretical and not scriptural/canonical.

 

Spoken like a true Paulinist!

Jesus was the person that Paul/Saul lied about.

 

Absolutely true.

 

Lefties lie and the huffington Post is struggling to sell lies

HARSH, BUT FAIR:

 

Do we know that they are now unemployed?

 

Only an idiot would say that.

 

Oh yeah.

The Media Industry Laid Off A Thousand People In January ... - HuffPost

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/.../1000-media-layoffs-buzzfeed-huffpost-yahoo-gan...

Like they told the coal miners, guess they better learn to write computer code!

Exposing the Media's anti-Christian bias.

New York Times reporter Dan Levin on Twitter, openly soliciting negative stories about Christian schools. “I’m a New York Times reporter writing about #exposechristianschools,” Levin tweeted, “Are you in your 20s or younger who went to a Christian school? I’d like to hear about your experience and its impact on your life. Please DM me.”

The tag was predominately used to dox and smear the Covington Catholic School kids. . . .

Even while the newspaper was rifling through Twitter looking for people who had been damaged by a traditional Christian education, it was running a fawning profile on the overtly racist and anti-Semitic “Black Hebrew Israelites.” The piece opens with the line: “They are sidewalk ministers who use confrontation as their gospel.”

Christian schools irritate the sensibilities of contemporary Democrats because students who attend them are saved from the leftist cultural and political indoctrination and parochial schools, private schools and homeschooling undermines their institutional political monopoly.​

Toxic media.

 

I thought that it was referring to those exact women in the photo.

 

Ironic PROJECTION of your own shortcomings duly noted and ignored for DEROGATORY reasons.

 

You have insufficient knowledge of just how unpopular the utility socialist (ie, COMMUNIST, according to many) is. We're about as uncool as it gets.

 

Okay .. now I know you know almost nothing of socialism/communism. It's horrifying just how clueless the modern leftist is regarding the foundations of their own alleged politics.

Here you go (write it down so you don't forget): Socialism/Communism: Equal distribution of resources within a collective, for equal work. Everyone gets a lunch, but no one gets a free lunch. Fail to pull your weight, and you're out. No exceptions other than for physical disability or great age.

 

All you have managed to establish, albeit inadvertently, is that there is not a dime's worth of difference between the extremist far left and the extremist far right when it comes to bigotry and being subject matter challenged.

Furthermore the problem with those on the extremes is that they are utterly incapable of grasping complex concepts like compromise, reason, fallibility, compassion and humanity.

To the extremists EVERYTHING is BINARY which is why they always FAIL!

 

* The mistake is on the part of those who regard themselves as socialists/communists (the cafe poseurs), but who think that a collective-based society would somehow magically still allow for elective non-participation. Only a capitalist thinks there should be enough of everything produced, to afford the luxury of elective loafing for whoever decides they want it.

* I did say that I'm FAR left - not soft, faux left .. like Progressives are. So what's your point? Is it simply that you're getting it now? Good, consider yourself better informed than you were 48 hours ago.

* Not binary, simply utilitarian. A self-sufficient collective (the only genuine form of communism) does not have the surplus (surplus being capitalism) to accommodate elective non-participation. For the best possible outcome for ALL (you know ... socialism), then ALL must participate. It's not rocket science, nor exclusionary, nor even very radical. If you want that kind of thing, then you must contribute to it. If you don't want that kind of thing, then you're free to enjoy the vagueries of a capitalist system. You can't have both, it simply doesn't work.

 

The mistake that extremists always make is that they believe that their absolutist solution is going to work.

Reality have proven time and again that NONE of the extremist positions work in practice regardless as to whether it is socialism, libertarianism, communism, capitalism, fascism, etc, etc.

To date the single best COMPROMISE solution that does work is Social Democracy which is a blend of the positive aspects while avoiding the negative harmful excesses of the extremes.

However it is IMPOSSIBLE to ever get extremists to even understand the term compromise, let alone get them to embrace it.

 

Yes, it DOES work. It works incredibly well. You would know them as 'communes', or even religious cults (in some cases). Even the strongly bonded multi-generational family living together is a collective .. when money and work is shared.

'Social democracy' is Capitalism. It depends upon surplus (the primary feature of capitalism, in this regard) to fund all those who elect not to contribute. Actual socialism/communism doesn't have surplus, so all those wanting to reap the benefits of the collective must contribute.

 

Now you are blathering on about religious cults!

Social democracies are based upon WELL REGULATED capitalism because that is a COMPROMISE!

Worker owned cooperatives are also based upon capitalism and that too is a COMPROMISE where the profits are shared amongst the workers rather than to outside shareholders.

Thanks for proving me right about extremists not being able to grasp the concept of compromise.