My intolerance? Odd. I never claimed to be a tolerant person. I will freely admit that I am an incredibly intolerant person. I abhor stupidity and silliness. I loathe the unintellectual. Now that being said, whilst I do not condone the actions of these folks, there are two sides to the issue here, that being folks wishing t impose their cult based morality onto others and those behaving poorly in response.
Every single one of those men who were sexually or physically assaulted was hurt. I doubt many injuries were reported. Why would a man report his injuries when the police said themselves there was nothing they could do because they were women???
Did you not read the post you quoted? That seems like a really, odd way to go about this. Clearly., very clearly, I said I do not condone the actions of these folks.
Here is what you said.................... 'Now that being said, whilst I do not condone the actions of these folks, there are two sides to the issue here, that being folks wishing t impose their cult based morality onto others and those behaving poorly in response.' Unless I missed something, those men were praying. What did you see? And calling them cultists makes my point all the more valid. Like I said. You condone assault otherwise why offer the attackers an out?
Ah, so you did not read the post you quoted, and instead resorted to creating a strawman argument, then condemning me for the false argument you assigned to me. Let me be clear, so I can demonstrate the error in your rebuttals here. This is what I said that you are ignoring in favor of attacking me personally. whilst I do not condone the actions of these folks This is not difficult to understand. I clearly said i do not condone these actions. Now clearly your statements have been demonstrated to be 100% incorrect in this matter. Are we clear that the error was yours?
Yes. I saw the part where you justified the attack by lying that the men, who were only praying, tried to 'impose' anything on those criminals. And you ignore the attack because after all, they were only 'cultists'. So in your mind, attacks are unacceptable unless 'cultists' pray. Then attack is understandable. MOD EDIT Off Topic reply removed
Run! Coward! I am wrong so I will call you a bunch of names! That is your argument,. You were wrong, utterly and completely, so now you resort to making false accusations and insulting me. Listen, I am sorry that you are wrong. i am sorry that you failed to read what i said and instead resorted to petty strawman arguments. But need you insult me due to your mistakes? Now clearly I stated I did not condone the actions of these folks. Why that is so difficult to accept and why you keep repeating that I did not tells me your argument has no interest in reality, simply flinging Texas sized cow patties.
Let's review here. Edited to get to the point fast. I said I did not condone it. I was accused of not having said that. I pointed out that I did. then I get called a bigot and said I am running away. The argument being put forth here seems to be attacking the exact opposite of what I said.
If feminism equals support for equal rights for women then why do feminists look at some inequalities favoring women as victories, not concerns???
I'm still waiting for one of those people who have claimed feminism just means equality to explain again how feminism just means equality after they've watched thousands of feminists cheering as some feminists sexually and physically assault men peacefully protecting a church. Still waiting hum dee dum......
You equated the men with those feminists by calling them 'cultists trying to impose'.............basically saying whaddya expect when two extremists clash? Wrong. You are wrong. You can't expect to be take seriously when you try to equate the two groups. Oner group was clearly nuts and raging while the other group was standing there and praying. Nothing more. So stop with the mischaracterization.
Well, one could say that murmuring top invisible beings that don't exist is a bit crazy too. That being said, clearly I stated, (*)(*)(*)(*)ing clearly, that I did not condone the behavior. I stated it. You said I did not. you were wrong. i was right. Embrace that fact.
What they did was wrong though. What they did was nothing short of assault. That kind of behavior should not be tolerated or condoned.
Their is a legititimate form of feminism out there but unfortunately the movement has been mostly hijacked by extremists. And anyone who thinks this isn't assault then consider these two different scenarios, what if this was done to children, and what if it were men who did this to women? Standing for a cause does not mean excusing the crazies. That's especially when you should call them out.
Frankly it looked to me like those gals (in the OP's video) were getting off on the whole thing. Some kind of 'femdom' role playing maybe. They're probably experiencing a group orgasm.
Sure it is. You called them cultists. You said they were trying to impose. Did you not? And they were both lies.
Well, technically, that is not correct. Religions are by definitions cults. Cult : a system of religious beliefs and ritual; also : its body of adherents So these religious fellows are , by definition, cultists. Now, that being said, their point was to impose there values onto these women, those being the values of the church. So you see, when you insult me with calling em a liar or saying I am lying, well, I am actually correct..
