Most American's supported Trump. The popular vote is wrong.

You folks were touting Hillary as the most qualified candidate in history, what's her defeat tell you? Probably nothing, it seems liberals never learn...

 

Not sure he said they don't count. But their immigration stance is not in the interest of the American worker, which means it is not in their own economic interests. Yet these people want more of their own kind to live amongst, and if they are illegal, so be it. This is the part B to economic globalization, which is the scheme to bottom out labor, take wages downward. So, while these Hispanics may want more of their own kind to come into America, turn the southwest into a Mexican culture, it is in no way in the greater interest of America for this to happen. So this group of voting Hispanics are against the best interest of America, and it is a good thing we have an electoral college.

So ambassador murray who MSM blacked out, said he knew the insider who leaked to wilkileaks, and the insider was not Russian. Which means it was a democrat who revealed the anti democratic DNC and the conspiracy against sanders and this may have helped trump to stomp Hillary a new *********. Still the dems will not take responsibility for their own poor choice of candidate, in a clear change election, as they had their heads deep up the innards of Hillary, and were so disconnected as not to be paying attention to the winds of change slamming into their party. But instead of serious When it was one of their own who leaked. You can't make this stuff up...

 

Actually she is but qualifications don't guarantee the best person gets the job. This past election is enormous proof of that, we got an unqualified, bombastic and buffoonery ridden man-child. Happy days......

 

Maybe we can work out a "3/4 compromise" with the racists on the right.

 

I wouldn't bother explaining it to them...All they understand is racism and division.

 

Actually it is known as the 3/5 compromise proposed by James Madison. (1783) Before that slaves were considered property by Southern-Democrat slave holders so they objected to slaves being counted with the number of inhabitants in their States in regard to tax collection.

Were it not for the EC, Latinos and other people living in CA would have undue influence on most of geographic America because of the higher population density. Therefore the EC was created to represent ALL STATES not just CA. It has nothing whatsoever to do with a 1783 amendment or racism. Plenty of Latinos, blacks, etc. live in less populated States as well.

 

Trump didn't win the popular vote nationally, he lost it by 3 million, nothing anyone says can make this not be a fact.

 

Trump lost the popular vote

not only that, many republicans voted against Hillary, not really for Trump

- - - Updated - - -

some republicans think calling lies "alternative facts" makes them facts

 

I agree 100% that Hillary failed on every level. This is a large part of the reason why Trump won. While Trump was running for Red (Conservative) ... I do not know that we can say this was a popular victory for the far right platform such as abortion rights. The people (on both sides) have become very anti establishment and Trump was the one in the election that wore that robe.

We shall see whether or not the emperor has any clothes. What is also something to note is how difficult it was to win against what was hands down the worse Blue candidate in modern history.

The right now has both houses and the Presidency. If they try to ram through far right platform's such as abortion I predict they will pay a heavy price.

 

bs, if they are illegal, they are going to be GONE, real soon now. Just watch. The sanctury cities will be ended in a month. They cannot stand without fed money and trump can shut it off like a faucet. it was difficult because of 10 million illegal votes and the media being 99% agains him, and he did it by spending HALF as much money as Clinton. We're going to get rid of the past 50 years of commie bs, real soon now.

 

I'm just waiting for them to try it in the next election

 

And all you seem to understand is bull(*)(*)(*)(*) and bombast. You're saying that NOBODY in areas that voted for Trump voted for Hillary and that ALL the people in such areas were Latinos. Are you really maintaining that? because it's the implied centerpiece of your argument, which make no sense at all otherwise

And how AREN'T you (*)(*)(*)(*)ing bloody racists? You're saying that Latinos are all UnAmerican, what could be any less racist/ethnicist than that

 

I never posted any of that, it's only your construct.

See above

I never said any of that either...Why do you feel the need to construct racist intentions where there is none? OR maybe you need glasses?

 

Exactly why obama flooded the country with illegals and it almost worked. Trump needs to start deporting immediately

- - - Updated - - -

Same polls that said Trump would be defeated in a landslide?

 

Yet you loved Clinton, a serial cheater, a workplace sexual abuser and an accused rapist.

 

You do realize that description fits Trump perfectly. If Republicans were smart they would stop talking about personal ethics cause Trump loses that discussion every time.

 

I realize the double standard from the left as they defended their pervert in chief and attack our new president over a few words

 

Truth.

 

What an idiotic premise. And racist I might add.

Let's take away all of the votes from
White people over 50; or
White people without college education; or
White gun owners.

How about we just negate 50% of the white voters in these states:
Kansas
Mississippi
Alabama
Oklahoma
South Dakota
North Dakota
Montana
Wyoming
South Carolina
Georgia

Please, take yours and Trumpco's racism elsewhere.

 

You'd think they'd be proud that they are a minority, and still won.

 

You mean like cheating on his wives. Or admitting sexual assault. Or crashing dressing rooms to ogle underage girls. Or ......

 

Interesting you get so worked up over inappropriate behavior alleged and otherwise over a lifetime of a president before he assumes office but vehemently defend far worse behavior by a sitting president with a D behind his name. Talk to me when Trump is diddling a 20 year old intern in the oval office.

 

Sorry but just responding to your twisted panties. And by the way the intern was the initiator. Not quite like Trump who brags about grabbing (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) because he is so hugh and famous that he can get away with it.

 

LOL... Really??

Clinton used the mesmerizing power of his position to seduce that young intern. Just like men in lofty positions have forever used their power to seduce women. It was nothing more than another notch in Clintons belt from a long line of previous conquests. Don't kid yourself otherwise.

 

Alleged? Might want to view the Billy Bush video. Your boy Trump BRAGGED about it, pal.