Mueller ‘pitbull’ Weissmann let slip they were trying to oust Trump by setting a perjury trap

I am going to complain about the context, leaving out what he said before the quote in question (about Berlusconi) is lame, because in that context it proves their intent to remove Trump beyond what you quoted.

It's not "and he compared," it's before the offending quote you did not after, so this site too failed to show proper mindset:

“And he compared Trump to former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, saying that Trump was also a ‘demagogue’ and ‘amoral.’”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...andrew-weissman-rants-against-trump-on-msnbc/

 

well then, that explains why the left can't be conned, thanks fer clearing that up...

 

"one of which"?? I'd be stunned if he could maintain a 1 in 3 truth ratio

 

The same with the persecution of Scooter Libby. The persecutor - Fitzgerald - knew on day 1 that no crime had been committed when he axed Bob Novak the name of the leaker, yet Fitz continued the "investigation." Libby mis-remembered a phone conversation from years before upon which a reporter had taken notes. Libby was persecuted even tho persecution witnesses had contradicted each other, and the phone conversation was not germane to any crime having been committed.

 

Uh oh, Weissmann is pulling the same lame appeal to ego tactic that many posters on this forum mimic. Never saw that before

 

Perhaps I "I cant remember" is the answer you were seeking from Trump too.

 

And you totally do everything you can to avoid the point. Why is that? Afraid to admit the truth?

 

"Here's an easy example... If Trump were asked 'did you personally withhold the aid to Ukraine' and he said 'No', that would be a lie and considered perjury."

Except that Trump didn't "personally" withhold the aid.

 

Yah we saw his mueller answers lol

 

“Talk about why his policies are wrong” (Weissmann, in context of the video)

Seven Days in May (1964)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058576/

The context of the traitor General James Mattoon Scott Weissmann’s reasoning with bringing up Berlusconi and POLICY is 100% clear.

When we do not have an actual crime let us just impeach for policy.

 

I've said that before if it wasn't for us stupid people you smart blokes would be led around like sheep. Oh wait, you are...

 

It's that thinking that would guarantee a perjury charge..

Go with that, I say...

 

How so? By manufacturing yet another fraudulent charge?

 

Trump could have just plead the fifth like all of the Obama officials did.

Then where does that leave us?

 

No, 2 of the 4 are still under review while 2 were determined to be illegal. Durham has a criminal investigation open on the abuse.

 

That is why Sanders is so popular with Democrats.

 

Under review? It's pretty cut and dried. If two weren't valid, why would it take longer to assess the other two?

The original is valid. It's the renewals where the issues are.

 

Exactly.

 

The POS Weismann is the one who should be prosecuted for his sleazy past, see https://observer.com/2015/01/in-and...kes-a-stunningly-bad-choice-for-crucial-role/ The same Swampy tactics used by corrupt FBI bad actors, withholding exculpatory evidence and threatening to indict witnesses whose testimony went against their narrative.

 

It is only a matter of time before the first 2 are declared invalid as well. The reason they have not is because Durham is investigating this entire mess and has declared it criminal.

The letter released Thursday by the court said the Justice Department, while not invalidating the first two warrants, is working to quarantine information collected under all four warrants targeting Page.
The Justice Department is said to have not taken a position on the validity of the other two surveillance authorizations on Page, according to the filing.

In other words, they are still under investigation.

 

I believe when the IG report came out both Barr and Durham took the unusual steps of disagreeing with the notion that the Russia hoax beginning was adequately predicated. I assume Durham is conducting a criminal investigation because he uncovered criminal acts. Transparency is good, right?

 

It's moot... somehow, Trump has managed to avoid swearing or avowing to tell the truth legally for his entire life... no reason to think that will be changing anytime soon.

But it would be serious fun to watch.... imagine the drinking games possible if it were public....

Drinking a shot on each lie would be fatal... need to be some other rules...

 

Can you repeat the question?
I don't understand the question.
I can't remember.
What box of files?

 

Apparently trumps the only one too stupid to avoid a perjury “trap” lol

 

I dont even know how to use a smart phone